Debate on lower drinking age bubbling up

Users who are viewing this thread

Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I think you should have to be 21 before you can drink or go to war. You should be able to join the military, but not be sent to the battlefield until the age of 21.

Here is a good point. If you allow me to give my life. Allow me to drink and gamble. If you say I cant drink or gamble dont allow me to make a bigger sacrafice than debt or a hangover. But there are no Marines that do not fight, if you cant go to fight than you cant be in the Marine Corps or the military.
 
  • 67
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Up here in Canada it's 19. I think if you're old enough to die for your country, you're old enough to have a beer. Or 10. lol

I think the majority of 19 year olds are going to drink if they want to anyway, regardless of the law.

the fact that the law is broken with success is no reason to change it. What message does that send?
 

GameCrazed

In Memoriam
Messages
155
Reaction score
9
Tokenz
0.00z
I hate this hypocritcal drinknig age. You can get loaded on painkill ers when you're 13, but you can't have a drink when you're a legal adult.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
I hate this hypocritcal drinknig age. You can get loaded on painkill ers when you're 13, but you can't have a drink when you're a legal adult.
Prescription pain killers given by a doctor with a medical degree for legitimate medical reasons can't be compared to under age drinking.
 
Messages
352
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Well, over in Europe, they start them early. Kids start drinking wine with their meals in France at the age of 12 or so, for example. If you look at the drunk driving accidents over there, its considerably lower in the states. So, this bring up one school of thought. If you start drinking responsibly at a young age, you'll probably drink responsibly at an older age.

Now, as a High School student, I can safely say that most of my peers are not discouraged at all by the laws set by the state of NJ on the legal drinking age being 21. They go out partying with their friends, and totally get smashed. They never learn to drink in moderation, like they would if they had European parents. So, as a result, some of them end up screwing their own lives, or the lives of others, through alcohol.

Luckily for me, my dad was smart and gave me this speech when I was younger.

But the main reason that the American Government is so hesitant on joining the rest of the world's school of thought is because of our heritage of prohibition. Ever since the mid 19th century, there have been attempts of forbidding the consumption of alcohol. It was called the Temperance movement, and was part of the larger Antebellum Reform Movement (which included women's rights, anti-slavery, all of that). Because it was grouped with equality movements and all that, you can bet that the temperance movement had the right intentions. But still, it missed the boat. Well, in my opinion, anyway.
And then you've got the Nation-wide Prohibition in the World War 1 Era. People still drank, but now it was illegally.

If you ask me, whats going on right now in America is essentially the Prohibition with teenagers. The law isn't stopping people from drinking. You can't limit what people drink. Its even difficult to regulate it. You just need people to understand the drink, which can be done easily through education, which the government does regulate.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I hate this hypocritcal drinknig age. You can get loaded on painkill ers when you're 13, but you can't have a drink when you're a legal adult.

You're a moron. It's illegal to get "loaded on painkillers" at your age too. I hope your parent whoop your ass for that comment. People like you are the reason my friend was killed by a fucking drunk driver :mad

Well, over in Europe, they start them early. Kids start drinking wine with their meals in France at the age of 12 or so, for example. If you look at the drunk driving accidents over there, its considerably lower in the states. So, this bring up one school of thought. If you start drinking responsibly at a young age, you'll probably drink responsibly at an older age.

Now, as a High School student, I can safely say that most of my peers are not discouraged at all by the laws set by the state of NJ on the legal drinking age being 21. They go out partying with their friends, and totally get smashed. They never learn to drink in moderation, like they would if they had European parents. So, as a result, some of them end up screwing their own lives, or the lives of others, through alcohol.

Luckily for me, my dad was smart and gave me this speech when I was younger.

But the main reason that the American Government is so hesitant on joining the rest of the world's school of thought is because of our heritage of prohibition. Ever since the mid 19th century, there have been attempts of forbidding the consumption of alcohol. It was called the Temperance movement, and was part of the larger Antebellum Reform Movement (which included women's rights, anti-slavery, all of that). Because it was grouped with equality movements and all that, you can bet that the temperance movement had the right intentions. But still, it missed the boat. Well, in my opinion, anyway.
And then you've got the Nation-wide Prohibition in the World War 1 Era. People still drank, but now it was illegally.

If you ask me, whats going on right now in America is essentially the Prohibition with teenagers. The law isn't stopping people from drinking. You can't limit what people drink. Its even difficult to regulate it. You just need people to understand the drink, which can be done easily through education, which the government does regulate.

I agree.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top