Canon vs Nikon Camera

[purpledove]

I am torn between Canon and Nikon camera. I am a loyal Canon person and have used them for many years now. I have always used a point and shoot camera and i think am ready to further advance into photography given the limitations with a P&S. However experiences of friends who does photo shoots for National Geographic, Official flickr tours etc I have heard otherwise. Most of them recommend Nikon and some of their complaints about Canon are: 1) it's a very expensive investment when it comes to accessories and lenses 2) difficulty of navigating interface with Canon cameras.

I've noticed there a lot of Canon fanatics and photography enthusiasts in this forum and hence wanna take the shot in getting your opinions.

The Nikon group have recently sent me this site to prove their point that Nikon is better and more innovative than Canon

http://www.photoradar.com/news/story/nikon-d3s-nasa-photos-taken-in-space

Any ideas is welcomed and thanks

 

[Tuffdisc]

2) haha, I have difficulties navigating around Nikon cameras

I just need a camera to take photos in space, so what if NASA used NOINK :24: Doesn't mean they're any better

If you saw the photos I have taken recently with a proper camera (CANON) no offence Nikon users, *back to point* I think you might be swayed to go Canon. Yes, they are a bit expensive, but coming from a P&S you should try the entry level cameras first to see if you are up for going to enthusiast level to pro cameras

 

[Francis]

I am torn between Canon and Nikon camera. I am a loyal Canon person and have used them for many years now. I have always used a point and shoot camera and i think am ready to further advance into photography given the limitations with a P&S. However experiences of friends who does photo shoots for National Geographic, Official flickr tours etc I have heard otherwise. Most of them recommend Nikon and some of their complaints about Canon are: 1) it's a very expensive investment when it comes to accessories and lenses 2) difficulty of navigating interface with Canon cameras.

I've noticed there a lot of Canon fanatics and photography enthusiasts in this forum and hence wanna take the shot in getting your opinions.

The Nikon group have recently sent me this site to prove their point that Nikon is better and more innovative than Canon

http://www.photoradar.com/news/story/nikon-d3s-nasa-photos-taken-in-space

Any ideas is welcomed and thanks

My opinion..

Read up on both styles you are looking at Canon and Nikon..

Go to the store and hand hold both types, with Lens on them.. Ask a lot of technical questions and if the person has no answers, seek a store that knows or has knowledge on the two..

Don't let someones bias on either Camera let you decide.. They could be making a LOT more money on one then the other, even if one is way cheaper then the other.. Trust me I am in sales..

Personally I just bought the Canon T2i and I am extremely happy with it.. But again, that is only my opinion..

 

[freakofnature]

I have a very basic Nikon DSLR and I love it. I've never had any complaints about it. It was suggested to me by a professional photographer friend who, ironically, uses Canon. I honestly don't think that one brand is going to take better pictures than the other. The photographer makes the camera, not the other way around. I guess it comes down to your user preferences and that can't be recommended.

 

[Tuffdisc]

I could even take the photos of the ISS with a pinhole camera, so brands don't really matter. The real point is that both brands can be expensive if you don't know how to use it, and someone tells you "oh, get this, get that etc..." and you listen to them. Photographers would know what equipment to get, irrespective of brand

 

[freakofnature]

I could even take the photos of the ISS with a pinhole camera, so brands don't really matter. The real point is that both brands can be expensive if you don't know how to use it, and someone tells you "oh, get this, get that etc..." and you listen to them. Photographers would know what equipment to get, irrespective of brand

:nod: I'd say a tripod would be a good investment. What kind of lenses you get would depend on what kind of photos you want to take. I've only bought two lenses and both are telephoto because I gravitate towards wildlife and sports photography. If you want to take a lot of close ups, then a good macro lens would be a solid investment. I'd also recommend getting a remote shutter release. One thing I've haven't invested in is a different flash. I just use the one on my camera. Not sure how critical that is. I've gotten by just fine without extra flashes. :dunno

 

[Tuffdisc]

:nod: I'd say a tripod would be a good investment. What kind of lenses you get would depend on what kind of photos you want to take. I've only bought two lenses and both are telephoto because I gravitate towards wildlife and sports photography. If you want to take a lot of close ups, then a good macro lens would be a solid investment. I'd also recommend getting a remote shutter release. One thing I've haven't invested in is a different flash. I just use the one on my camera. Not sure how critical that is. I've gotten by just fine without extra flashes. :dunno

If you want to take photos of fireworks, and decent wide angle-ultra wide angle is good, plus a good tripod, doesn't have to be the flashiest shutter release and a good technical knowledge will also suffice :thumbup

 

[freakofnature]

If you want to take photos of fireworks, and decent wide angle-ultra wide angle is good, plus a good tripod, doesn't have to be the flashiest shutter release and a good technical knowledge will also suffice :thumbup

I've taken decent photos of fireworks with my kit lens and no tripod. Tripod would have been better, though. I'm lazy. :ninja

 

[Tuffdisc]

I've taken decent photos of fireworks with my kit lens and no tripod. Tripod would have been better, though. I'm lazy. :ninja

I did some amazing fireworks this year

 

[freakofnature]

I did some amazing fireworks this year

I've had some amazing fireworks this year. :nod:


Wait...what??? :willy_nilly: :ninja

 

[Tuffdisc]

I've had some amazing fireworks this year. :nod:


Wait...what??? :willy_nilly: :ninja

Wait what???

 

[freakofnature]

Wait what???

I dunno...could you please repeat the question?

:ninja

 

[skyblue]

bear in mind that if you choose either brand eventually you''l develope a specific photographic interest and purchase expensive lenses to allow you the best possible results.......with a canon you buy the lens once,when you decide to upgrade you only buy the camera body as the old lenses will fit

 

[purpledove]

2) haha, I have difficulties navigating around Nikon cameras

I just need a camera to take photos in space, so what if NASA used NOINK :24: Doesn't mean they're any better

If you saw the photos I have taken recently with a proper camera (CANON) no offence Nikon users, *back to point* I think you might be swayed to go Canon. Yes, they are a bit expensive, but coming from a P&S you should try the entry level cameras first to see if you are up for going to enthusiast level to pro cameras

Well, their point is that Nikon is more innovative- far more advanced and can progress much faster in technology than Canon. Idk:dunno

Oh there's no doubt, even without looking at Nikon- i can easily go to Canon as I've had good experience with their cameras. Just that I am opening my mind to the possibility of maybe giving a chance to Nikon given the experience esp of those friends of mine who does National Geographic shots.

entry level is a good suggestion of course however wouldn't i be wasting money that wld have been invested to lenses etc if i go maybe mid level ? I am thinking soon, i will have to toss the entry level camera and buy next level :dunno

My opinion..

Read up on both styles you are looking at Canon and Nikon..

Go to the store and hand hold both types, with Lens on them.. Ask a lot of technical questions and if the person has no answers, seek a store that knows or has knowledge on the two..

Don't let someones bias on either Camera let you decide.. They could be making a LOT more money on one then the other, even if one is way cheaper then the other.. Trust me I am in sales..

Personally I just bought the Canon T2i and I am extremely happy with it.. But again, that is only my opinion..

I did read on both styles and specs and all. There's not so much of difference and when one gets the Canon at sale price maybe this Black Friday- then it's almost same price. That's where i get torn. The thing am wondering now is in the long run- would it make me spend more of I stick with Canon :willy_nilly:

That a good idea to check at the stores :nod: Was also suggested there are some stores now who rent out cameras per day or week etc. Is that practical?

 

[Tuffdisc]

Well, their point is that Nikon is more innovative- far more advanced and can progress much faster in technology than Canon. Idk:dunno

Oh there's no doubt, even without looking at Nikon- i can easily go to Canon as I've had good experience with their cameras. Just that I am opening my mind to the possibility of maybe giving a chance to Nikon given the experience esp of those friends of mine who does National Geographic shots.

entry level is a good suggestion of course however wouldn't i be wasting money that wld have been invested to lenses etc if i go maybe mid level ? I am thinking soon, i will have to toss the entry level camera and buy next level :dunno

I don't think you would be wasting money on an entry level, the most expensive part of slr camera is not the body itself, but the lenses, like zirc and me have said, you have to think about what lens(es) you really need. I would go for the kit lens for the time being, experiment (hence the entry level, I had begun with an entry level slr, I am sure that most on here have done so as well) and see what your niche's are, if the lens suits your purpose then stick with it, there isn't a point to buy an enthusiast at this stage:thumbup

 

[purpledove]

I have a very basic Nikon DSLR and I love it. I've never had any complaints about it. It was suggested to me by a professional photographer friend who, ironically, uses Canon. I honestly don't think that one brand is going to take better pictures than the other. The photographer makes the camera, not the other way around. I guess it comes down to your user preferences and that can't be recommended.

Hmmm....for some odd reason all the while i thought you have a Sony DSLR- Yeah am confused:willy_nilly:

2 girl friends of mine who does the flickr tour shots and does really some serious photography stuffs- sold their Canon equipment to shift to Nikon. They're the ones too who claimed about the easy maneuverability of controls of Nikon vs Canon. Makes me more confused eh :24:

I could even take the photos of the ISS with a pinhole camera, so brands don't really matter. The real point is that both brands can be expensive if you don't know how to use it, and someone tells you "oh, get this, get that etc..." and you listen to them. Photographers would know what equipment to get, irrespective of brand

Thanks for this additional info

 

[freakofnature]

Hmmm....for some odd reason all the while i thought you have a Sony DSLR- Yeah am confused:willy_nilly:

2 girl friends of mine who does the flickr tour shots and does really some serious photography stuffs- sold their Canon equipment to shift to Nikon. They're the ones too who claimed about the easy maneuverability of controls of Nikon vs Canon. Makes me more confused eh :24:



Thanks for this additional info

Siph is the one with the Sony. I've got a Nikon D40. I find the controls to be fairly easy use. Whether or not they're easier than a Canon, I can't say as I've never used one.

 

[purpledove]

:nod: I'd say a tripod would be a good investment. What kind of lenses you get would depend on what kind of photos you want to take. I've only bought two lenses and both are telephoto because I gravitate towards wildlife and sports photography. If you want to take a lot of close ups, then a good macro lens would be a solid investment. I'd also recommend getting a remote shutter release. One thing I've haven't invested in is a different flash. I just use the one on my camera. Not sure how critical that is. I've gotten by just fine without extra flashes. :dunno

I like taking wildlife,nature, scenic views and also doing close ups esp of interesting stuffs in nature/flowers/trees etc. I like doing panoramic views too. Thanks for the tips on different equipments. I have to go slow though eh and start with basic stuffs first then go from there? I guess....

If you want to take photos of fireworks, and decent wide angle-ultra wide angle is good, plus a good tripod, doesn't have to be the flashiest shutter release and a good technical knowledge will also suffice :thumbup

Oh yes, I like taking pics of fireworks. Thanks :cool

 

[purpledove]

bear in mind that if you choose either brand eventually you''l develope a specific photographic interest and purchase expensive lenses to allow you the best possible results.......with a canon you buy the lens once,when you decide to upgrade you only buy the camera body as the old lenses will fit

Excellent idea :nod:However, i think you lost me :24::willy_nilly::willy_nilly:

I presume you are a Canon user. So u mean to say it pays off starting with Canon despite the bit of the price difference as in the end, it will save me more? Very interesting and maybe just what i needed to hear.If I got you right?! Ta

I am in that position and would care less about the expense if it's worth it in the end Given the good history Canon Cameras had with me, I didnt mind the additional money as i was very much satisfied with it- reliability, quality of shots and durability. I did try like cheaper brands b4 that and ended up buying a new one after a few uses as they were crappy. So when computed- it makes it much more expensive than if I started with Canon in the beginning. :ninja

 

[freakofnature]

Excellent idea :nod:However, i think you lost me :24::willy_nilly::willy_nilly:

I presume you are a Canon user. So u mean to say it pays off starting with Canon despite the bit of the price difference as in the end, it will save me more? Very interesting and maybe just what i needed to hear.If I got you right?! Ta

I am in that position and would care less about the expense if it's worth it in the end Given the good history Canon Cameras had with me, I didnt mind the additional money as i was very much satisfied with it- reliability, quality of shots and durability. I did try like cheaper brands b4 that and ended up buying a new one after a few uses as they were crappy. So when computed- it makes it much more expensive than if I started with Canon in the beginning. :ninja

I think what he's saying is that if you start with a basic Canon DSLR and buy lenses for it, down the road when you want to upgrade you don't have to buy new lenses because they will work on a bunch of different Canon models. Nikon is the same. The lenses fit a wide range of camera bodies.

I am also a believer in you get what you paid for. :nod: