Blame the Libertarians. It's less Painful

[darkcgi]

NOT ME BUT IT COULD HAPPEN JUST SAYIN

 

[Tim]

You do realize you should make a choice according to ones history and not their party....Thing is you openly admit it..In essence you would vote for a rock if it was a democrat

Ok let's go with history then.

In the last 51 years
Total: Increase of 23.9 million jobs under Republican presidents
Total: Increase of 42.3 million jobs under Democrat presidents
Democrats win by a large margin.
(Source)


Democrats win again by a large margin
(source)



Once again, democrats win.
(source)

Shall I keep on going?????

 

[The Man]

About half of those are attributed to Clinton who was an exceptional president 20. 7 million..almost half
regan provided right at 15 million himself...another exceptional president...So again,,its not about the party it is about the individual as president

Your boy Obama ranks second from the bottom right there with bush Obama a third of a million jobs.
Thing is since Obama went in while it was at its worst...it would have been the easiest to work with due to the largest number of unemployed...Obama sucks as an individual

You have only confirmed what I have stated...People will vote for a party regardless of who they are.
You people are to blind to see that Obama is Bush2...bush policy still remains in effect..as well as Obama adding additional policy

 

[robdawg1]

About half of those are attributed to Clinton who was an exceptional president 20. 7 million..almost half
regan provided right at 15 million himself...another exceptional president...So again,,its not about the party it is about the individual as president

Your boy Obama ranks second from the bottom right there with bush Obama a third of a million jobs.
Thing is since Obama went in while it was at its worst...it would have been the easiest to work with due to the largest number of unemployed...Obama sucks as an individual

You have only confirmed what I have stated...People will vote for a party regardless of who they are.
You people are to blind to see that Obama is Bush2...bush policy still remains in effect..as well as Obama adding additional policy

Why does support of Obama equal blind democratism. also, fact check please, Obama's record is certainly better by far than Bush jr.

 

[The Man]

Why does support of Obama equal blind democratism. also, fact check please, Obama's record is certainly better by far than Bush jr.

No one has said that supporting Obama equals blind democrapics ...However we do have people that will vote democrat regardless of how poor the choice of candidate is.
As far as the fact checks..Obama ranks 2 from the bottom with bush being at the bottom....thus makes him worse than all other presidents except bush...Time for change...screw obama

 

[robdawg1]

No one has said that supporting Obama equals blind democrapics ...However we do have people that will vote democrat regardless of how poor the choice of candidate is.
As far as the fact checks..Obama ranks 2 from the bottom with bush being at the bottom....thus makes him worse than all other presidents except bush...Time for change...screw obama

I am going to need SOME sort of citation, link or article you read this statistic! I have yet to see that anywhere

 

[The Man]

I am going to need SOME sort of citation, link or article you read this statistic! I have yet to see that anywhere

Tim posted the link in one of these political threads today...dont remember which one.

 

[The Man]

Update...its this thread just look up a few posts rob to tims last post in this thread

 

[Minor Axis]

No one has said that supporting Obama equals blind democrapics ...However we do have people that will vote democrat regardless of how poor the choice of candidate is.

If you are going to be fair, you'd not single out Democrats, but point out that many people will vote for their party of preference, based on their political leanings and the professed standards of the party in question. Yes, in many cases it does not matter who the candidate is, check out Bush, Palin, and Romney, lol. If the candidate fails, the next guy will be better. It is still the party standards where the loyalty lies.

 

[The Man]

If you are going to be fair, you'd not single out Democrats, but point out that many people will vote for their party of preference, based on their political leanings and the professed standards of the party in question. Yes, in many cases it does not matter who the candidate is, check out Bush, Palin, and Romney, lol. If the candidate fails, the next guy will be better. It is still the party standards where the loyalty lies.

If you are going to be fair, you'd not single out Democrats, but point out that many people will vote for their party of preference,

I have already pointed that out.

but point out that many people will vote for their party of preference, based on their political leanings and the professed standards of the party in question.

Already done


What you seem to be missing is it does not matter whether a person is a dem or rep...you should vote for someone according to their history....which ever party he is he will have that backing in congress anyway.
To be honest we are better off without the dem and rep shit...so they can vote on a bill based upon the need / rather than vote against a bill because it was the other parties idea...just like fucking children.

Idiocy not only at the polls...but in Washington as well...a nation filled with ignorant fucks with the emotional capacity of adolescents ...voting for thier own self gratification or for the team gratifications...rather than for what is actually best for society.

People are ignorant

 

[robdawg1]

What you seem to be missing is it does not matter whether a person is a dem or rep...you should vote for someone according to their history....which ever party he is he will have that backing in congress anyway.
To be honest we are better off without the dem and rep shit...so they can vote on a bill based upon the need / rather than vote against a bill because it was the other parties idea...

This is perhaps the smartest and best thing you have said in all of your political posts. FINALLY something we can agree on!!!

 

[The Man]

This is perhaps the smartest and best thing you have said in all of your political posts. FINALLY something we can agree on!!!

I had missed this post.
All my posts are smart...Some of them can be frustrating for a democrat as they go against his belief system {dem good..rep bad}..Facts and logic to subject are taken as attack on the democratic party {which is not the case}.
I am neither rep nor dem ...bush was an idiot and so is Obama..I cant be faithful to a party as they are just a party..I will however attack bad policy regardless of origin...at the present it just happens to be the Obama administration.
For example /I praised Clinton for his time in office..he was a dem.
Clinton got alot done and he got in done fast...he kept his promises..he did fail on the healthcare he was pushing though..it wasnt from lack of trying ..just lack of cooperation.

 

[Accountable]

If you are going to be fair, you'd not single out Democrats,

:24: :24: :24:
That's rich, coming from you! :24:
Thanks for starting my day with a good laugh.

 

[Minor Axis]

:24: :24: :24:
That's rich, coming from you! :24:
Thanks for starting my day with a good laugh.

My pleasure. :booty:

 

[Minor Axis]

To be honest we are better off without the dem and rep shit...so they can vote on a bill based upon the need / rather than vote against a bill because it was the other parties idea...just like fucking children.
People are ignorant

Whether you have an organized party or individuals, they will still group along philosophical lines, whatever they might be. If they did not have official names, they'd have unofficial names. I agree with your last statement.

 

[Dana]

I really don't give two shits about any political party and the mockery of a government we have. But to say that we HAVE to choose is ridiculous. I used to sway that way thinking oh I'll just choose the imbecile who is the better candidate in the long run but in the end it doesn't make a difference. Politicians are in business to make false promises and rely on empty words. Voting third party at least they keep their dignity. I'd rather not vote at all honestly. It doesn't matter who gets elected it'll be the same shit. This article reads as just a bunch of political bullying by the author.

 

[The Man]

I really don't give two shits about any political party and the mockery of a government we have. But to say that we HAVE to choose is ridiculous. I used to sway that way thinking oh I'll just choose the imbecile who is the better candidate in the long run but in the end it doesn't make a difference. Politicians are in business to make false promises and rely on empty words. Voting third party at least they keep their dignity. I'd rather not vote at all honestly. It doesn't matter who gets elected it'll be the same shit. This article reads as just a bunch of political bullying by the author.

Many people dont vote for that reason "If there was someone running worth voting for I would vote"
I can respect that.