at the height of hypocrisy
- Thread starter retro
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
-
103Replies
-
3KViews
-
0Participant count
-
Participants list
She's doing it at work and he's doing it here. The only difference is she has the nerve to do it in front of those she's talking about for the most part. She isn't doing it behind everyones back like Retro is and that to me is a big part of the hypocrisy.
Someone that's concerned about the welfare of children that's who.
Of course it's sad if a parent spends the vast majority of their free time , never mind their work time, on the net instead of interacting with their kids.
I don't have little children in my house. If I did you wouldn't see me here much. Lucky for you I have summer yard work coming up so you won't see me much anyway. You better get your cheap shots in now or you'll have to wait for winter again.
Alien Allen
Froggy the Prick
Holy crap this thread has given me a headache
And I normally like a good pissing contest
I gotta side with Retro on this one. He clearly was talking about another persons hypocrisy. Good thing there was not a basketball pole also involved eh
And once again the issue of red rep arises. Good grief get a grip folks. Who gives a fuck about rep anyway
And I normally like a good pissing contest
I gotta side with Retro on this one. He clearly was talking about another persons hypocrisy. Good thing there was not a basketball pole also involved eh
And once again the issue of red rep arises. Good grief get a grip folks. Who gives a fuck about rep anyway
you just dont get it guyzerr lol
your argument was weak, not valid and was pointless and completely offtopic. :24::24::24:
do you know if his kid was staying with him or the mom? you dont know do ya? that is immature to even bring that up in this thread.
but you will never admit when you are wrong.
your argument was weak, not valid and was pointless and completely offtopic. :24::24::24:
do you know if his kid was staying with him or the mom? you dont know do ya? that is immature to even bring that up in this thread.
but you will never admit when you are wrong.
You aren't concerned about the welfare of any child. You wanted to hit below the belt. You did and you looked pathetic doing so.
Posting on a forum isn't putting any child into harms way. And how the hell do you know where the child is even at? I believe Haus did a good job pointing out exactly how much he posts. He's been here since 07 and has almost 1/2 the amount of posts that you have. Oh yea....he's spending soooooooooo much time on here.
Hey guess what. I sit on here for hours when my kids are in bed and that starts around 7:30 at night, bet you'd never know that they go to bed that early. You going to start making pathetic, worthless, sad comments towards me that way? Or how about every other person on this forum that is a parent and has more posts that Retro.
Thanks for ruining another thread BTW Guyzerr. Good job. You made it into an argument that held no place in the topic and then you had to act all childish making comments about someones child that you don't even know.
You are NOT, in the words of Charlie Sheen, WINNING! But good try.
Last edited by a moderator:
Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
The stupididy of so called adults on this thread is embarressing. I dont see whats so hard to understand, Retro was moaning about the woman being a hypocrite, not unproffessional. And even if your brain cant get that for some reason, what are you getting so worked up about anyway?
HottyToddyChick
Toes in the water...
Alright folks. Get back on topic, if you want to discuss something, do it by focusing on that person's POV, NOT on their children! Nobody here except Retro knows what his situation is with his son and it's asinine to think that any one of us could assume and be correct.
Nothing to report here today, she's out visiting clients today... or at least appears to be since she isn't here.
Thank you
Thank you
Springsteen
Number 2, Rafael!
Reminds me of Dr Weaver on ER, everyone was glad when she was off that day on an episode last week.
Very well said. :clap
And it's pretty obvious what your intentions were Guy. The OP was pretty clear to me and quite a few other posters here.
He wasn't bitching because she was being unprofessional, he was calling her hypocritical for doing something that she was yelling at other people for doing.
But I guess you could miss the point of the thread if you didn't know the definition of hypocrisy. :dunno
And yes, my red rep was specifically aimed at your inability to keep the argument between yourselves. The second someone resorts to insulting the family or parenting skills when it wasn't even part of the discussion shows their true self as childish and quite immature.
I completely agree :24: I seriously think I'm gonna get some Snus tonight and put it on her desk on my way back home from the business dinner I have to go to tonight.
and I say that as mostly a joke, because I know I wouldn't actually do that. :willy_nilly:
Alien Allen
Froggy the Prick
my old man chewed tobacco all his life till he died in his mid 80's
and yup it is nasty. I tried it a couple times and the taste was horrid. :yuk
I could understand someone who works in a labor filled job, like being a lumber jack or railroad worker...etc to be chewing tobacco, but in an office setting... no way lol.
I would totally buy some snus for her Retro lol. Not like she will know who did it if she doesn't see you.
I would totally buy some snus for her Retro lol. Not like she will know who did it if she doesn't see you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snus
It's basically another form of smokeless tobacco... like dipping/chewing, but it's used slightly differently and it doesn't cause excessive saliva like dipping does. Hence, there's not really a need to spit every 10-15 seconds.
It's basically another form of smokeless tobacco... like dipping/chewing, but it's used slightly differently and it doesn't cause excessive saliva like dipping does. Hence, there's not really a need to spit every 10-15 seconds.
80,576Threads
2,194,977Messages
5,014Members