Abortion. Right or wrong?

Users who are viewing this thread

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Some would say putting a child through the adoption system in America is worse than death. They're not far off, I know people who work it and they say it absolutely destroys children.
I guess it's a case by case thing. If I'm not mistaken, Breath went through it. And she says she'd have no problem putting her child up for adoption instead of having an abortion.
 
  • 257
    Replies
  • 7K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
That's kind of obvious...not being born at all = no life. At least they use the fetuses to benefit mankind. Finding new cures to diseses and all.
Name the last disease that was cured by using a fetus.


Don't get me wrong, I'm for stem cell research and what not. But you can't say they're "finding new cures", when they haven't found one.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
You can't have stem cells without a fetus. Abortion produces more fetuses. Women aren't exactly offering up their children to science these days. The last thing they used stem cells to cure, weren't they working on people that are paralyzed? Among working on other ways to use stem cells to regenerate tissue or whatever.
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
You can't have stem cells without a fetus. Abortion produces more fetuses. Women aren't exactly offering up their children to science these days. The last thing they used stem cells to cure, weren't they working on people that are paralyzed? Among working on other ways to use stem cells to regenerate tissue or whatever.
Have they cured paralysis yet? Then nothing has been cured by stem cells. They're "trying" to cure diseases, they're "working on" curing diseases, but you can't say they are curing diseases.

And for the record, paralysis isn't really a disease.
 

BadBoy@TheWheel

DT3's Twinkie
Messages
20,999
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.06z
You can't have stem cells without a fetus. Abortion produces more fetuses. Women aren't exactly offering up their children to science these days. The last thing they used stem cells to cure, weren't they working on people that are paralyzed? Among working on other ways to use stem cells to regenerate tissue or whatever.


Oh...and you can harvest stem cells and not kill the fetus by the way.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Funny, one could say the same about never being born in the first place :dunno
A fetus in the first trimester, oddly enough, isn't life either.


Name the last disease that was cured by using a fetus.


Don't get me wrong, I'm for stem cell research and what not. But you can't say they're "finding new cures", when they haven't found one.
They certainly have been able to grow entire, working organs and limbs for people.
 

Breath

Banned!
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I guess it's a case by case thing. If I'm not mistaken, Breath went through it. And she says she'd have no problem putting her child up for adoption instead of having an abortion.

I didn't get adopted. I was in the foster system. My mother (stupidly) never gave up full custody of me so I could never get adopted. I wish like hell I could have been though.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,390Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top