A Peaceful Religion?

Users who are viewing this thread

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Yes Italy is Europe. Most countries at some point lead the way in one fashion or another. It just peaked when the English got their act together.


Muslims led the world in science until 10th/12the century....their rule in Spain is known as the Golden Period of Muslim rule!
 
  • 75
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
All knowledge is built upon what came before it. That's how things progress. The Moors are an important part of that progression.


Tariq bin Ziyad was a moor after whom Giberalter is named....he was the one who conquered Spain.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
I've actually seen those articles before. However, it has no sway on what I have already said. Europeans retook their own land from the invaders, reestablished European rules and expanded their technologies to surpass anyone else on the planet.



It isn't. Secular forms of government are "not of Allah". They are sinful. It is absurd to say that any devout Muslim would support a sinful form of government.







If anyone is interested, especially if you live in the UK or in Europe, here is a nice little survey on attitudes of Islamic youth on university campuses. it is an eye opener:


http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1231525079_1.pdf





Pages 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 60 are interesting.




SUMMARY:


How supportive if at all would you be of the introduction
of a worldwide Caliphate based on Sharia Law?

33% very supportive



How supportive if at all would you be of the introduction of a worldwide Caliphate based on Sharia Law? A comparison of active ISOC members and non-members

58% very supportive






Killing for the Faith

Respondents were asked if it is ever justifiable to kill in the name of religion. Just under a third of Muslim students polled (32%) said killing in the name of religion was justified – the vast majority of these (28% of all respondents) said killing could be justified if the religion was under attack and 4% of respondents supported killing in order to promote and preserve that religion. A further one in six (15%) Muslim students polled were unsure leaving just over half (53%) who believe killing in the name of religion was never justifiable. By contrast, 2% of non-Muslims polled felt killing in the name of religion was justified and a further 4% were unsure. An overwhelming majority – 94% – said killing in the name of religion was never justifiable.




Activity in an ISOC affected results. Three fifths (60%) of active ISOC members polled said they believed it acceptable to kill in the name of religion – one in ten (11%) felt it acceptable to kill in order to promote and preserve that religion and nearly half (49%) said it was acceptable only if that religion was under attack. By contrast, 63% of non-ISOC members said it was never acceptable. Unusually the percentages of active ISOC members and non-members who said they were unsure were roughly equal (10% and 12% respectively), suggesting that on this issue – unlike questions regarding Sharia – non-ISOC members are more likely to form clear opinions.




The majority (60%) of active ISOC members believe that it is justifiable to kill in the name of religion as compared to only 2% of non-Muslim students who feel the same. 94% of non-Muslim students said it is never justifiable to kill in the name of religion whilst less than a third (30%) of active ISOC members agreed.




Age was a factor in opinion-forming: younger (age 18-34) respondents were twice as likely (33%) as older (age 35-54) (16%) to support killing in the name of religion. No older (age 35-54) respondents supported killing in order to preserve and promote that religion whilst 70% said it was never justifiable.



Male Muslim students polled were more likely (35%) than females (28%) to support killing in the name of religion. Females were similarly much more likely (59%) than males (46%) to say that killing in the name of religion was never justifiable and less likely to be unsure.


Overall, findings indicate that younger (age 18-34) male active ISOC members are more likely than other Muslim students to support killing in the name of religion, while support is much lower among non-ISOC members, females and older (age 35-54) students.



Active ISOC members tended more than other respondents towards a strict view of apostasy and what should happen to a person who decides to leave Islam. One in six (16%) active ISOC members advocated punishing apostates in accordance with Sharia, and a further three fifths (61%) said that apostates should be encouraged to reconsider their decision. By contrast, two fifths (41% ) of non-ISOC members said that apostates should be left alone.


sorry I don't have the time and energy to go through the link you've posted. But as a Muslim I know who a Muslim is and what he is supposed to do. The results of the survey are fallacious as are the questions and answers. The point is what do you mean by ''to kill in the name of religion''??? What is secularism??
What do you mean by 'promotion of their religion''?? What are laws? Why isn't okay for Muslims to follow their Laws in their own countries??

As regards Apostates there is little room for them to live in a Muslim-majority country because
he cannot sustain living there after hurting the sentiments of other fellows. An apostate is a traitor to his irrevocable oath when he accepted Islam....thus it is natural for him to repent or
flee for his life or face death not only at the hands of his countries Law but also perhaps at the hands of aggrieved and angry Muslims around. Luckily I have not seen any Muslim apostate yet
However, there have been incidences of naming a Muslim as apostate for his differing views on the interpretation of Islamic tenets and facing the music thereof. If I were to speak bullshit like Christians speak about Christianity I would be dead within no time!! The concept of freedom of Speech and freedom itself is very different than what the western mind is attuned to. If you were in Afghanistan or Saudia or Pakistan even you wouldn't want to speak against Islam as you do without first having good knowledge about it. Furthermore, Muslims do not compel anyone to embrace their religion....however, like Christians missionaries, some do invite.... These are my personal views but I hardly think I am wrong!

 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
please prove it !


http://listverse.com/2008/06/09/top-10-reasons-the-dark-ages-were-not-dark/


I'll fully admit that the Muslims did contribute mathematics, but really, most of the major revolutions in the so called "dark ages" were purely European.


I also highly recommend this book. I've read it and it lays the argument out in greater detail:


http://www.amazon.com/Inheritance-Rome-Illuminating-Dark-400-1000/dp/0143117424/ref=pd_sim_b_1





sorry I don't have the time and energy to go through the link you've posted. But as a Muslim I know who a Muslim is and what he is supposed to do. The results of the survey are fallacious as are the questions and answers. The point is what do you mean by ''to kill in the name of religion''??? What is secularism??
What do you mean by 'promotion of their religion''?? What are laws? Why isn't okay for Muslims to follow their Laws in their own countries??

As regards Apostates there is little room for them to live in a Muslim-majority country because
he cannot sustain living there after hurting the sentiments of other fellows. An apostate is a traitor to his irrevocable oath when he accepted Islam....thus it is natural for him to repent or
flee for his life or face death not only at the hands of his countries Law but also perhaps at the hands of aggrieved and angry Muslims around. Luckily I have not seen any Muslim apostate yet
However, there have been incidences of naming a Muslim as apostate for his differing views on the interpretation of Islamic tenets and facing the music thereof. If I were to speak bullshit like Christians speak about Christianity I would be dead within no time!! The concept of freedom of Speech and freedom itself is very different than what the western mind is attuned to. If you were in Afghanistan or Saudia or Pakistan even you wouldn't want to speak against Islam as you do without first having good knowledge about it. Furthermore, Muslims do not compel anyone to embrace their religion....however, like Christians missionaries, some do invite.... These are my personal views but I hardly think I am wrong!

How are the results fallacious when it was done by a non-partisan research group and actual Muslim students gave answers? You simply don't like the answers they gave.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Then they have eschewed their culture. There can be no "moderation" when it comes to the Koran. Either you follow it or you don't.


No, every Muslim living in various countries has its own culture but his 'religious culture', if that's the correct term
to state, is almost the SAME universally! A Muslim in, say, Afghanistan or Pakistan is almost the SAME as in the US, Africa, China, Japan, Alaska or Russia, as far as their religious culture is concerned but they will differ in their
daily/or regional culture! So, this feature goes in making them brethren UNIVERSALLY! Since there are many sects among Muslims some deviations in thought about Quranic laws could be seen every where. For example, most of the Muslims do not believe in the Saudi type of Islam!
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
No, every Muslim living in various countries has its own culture but his 'religious culture', if that's the correct term
to state, is almost the SAME universally!
A Muslim in, say, Afghanistan or Pakistan is almost the SAME as in the US, Africa, China, Japan, Alaska or Russia, as far as their religious culture is concerned but they will differ in their
daily/or regional culture! So, this feature goes in making them brethren UNIVERSALLY! Since there are many sects among Muslims some deviations in thought about Quranic laws could be seen every where. For example, most of the Muslims do not believe in the Saudi type of Islam!
Thats....what...i've been saying...


I'm referring to a lot of western Muslims. The ones I know are pretty much the same as the other poster described. They put forth a western lifestyle and ideas before the teaching of the koran.



It is also funny that there is different "types" of Islam. I'm not sure Muhammad or Allah would be very pleased at the fact that there different "types". Hmmmm which one is correct? You better choose wisely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
http://listverse.com/2008/06/09/top-10-reasons-the-dark-ages-were-not-dark/


I'll fully admit that the Muslims did contribute mathematics, but really, most of the major revolutions in the so called "dark ages" were purely European.


I also highly recommend this book. I've read it and it lays the argument out in greater detail:


http://www.amazon.com/Inheritance-Rome-Illuminating-Dark-400-1000/dp/0143117424/ref=pd_sim_b_1






How are the results fallacious when it was done by a non-partisan research group and actual Muslim students gave answers? You simply don't like the answers they gave.

I don't believe in theory, moreso in a poll conducted in UK under undue influence. Hold this post in any Muslim country and I would hasten to believe it!!:)

Secondly, I am living among 200Million Muslims around...and that's practical enough for any purpose to
state my practical and direct observations and experience about Muslims and Muslim thought!!
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't believe in theory, moreso in a poll conducted in UK under undue influence. Hold this post in any Muslim country and I would hasten to believe it!!:)

Secondly, I am living among 200Million Muslims around...and that's practical enough for any purpose to
state my practical and direct observations and experience about Muslims and Muslim thought!!
Theory? This is objective evidence based off of ACTUAL answers given by the Muslim students.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Thats....what...i've been saying...

I'm referring to a lot of western Muslims. The ones I know are pretty much the same as the other poster described. They put forth a western lifestyle and ideas before the teaching of the koran.

So, you agree that Muslims in the West are living as per Laws there, I really do not understand what's the fuss about then??

It is also funny that there is different "types" of Islam. I'm not sure Muhammad or Allah would be very pleased at the fact that there different "types". Hmmmm which one is correct? You better choose wisely.


Can you tell me which sect of Christians is correct??

I can see that you have absolutely vague knowledge about Islam, therefore for you guidance and answer to your inquisitiveness I am posting the following article (url) written by a non-Muslim about Muslim and sects, etc, and I am sure you will enjoy reading it.
Be it clear that I do not agree with the observations of the author in toto and have my own reservations.


Debating Jihad
By Yoginder Sikand
Contrary to popularly held views about jihad is what some Muslim scholars insist is the true Quranic understanding of the term: struggle or sincere and sustained efforts in the path of God. Such jihadic struggles and efforts, they point out, need not necessarily be directed against non-Muslims, and they are also not necessarily all violent



and this.....

Bombs Make No Moral Distinctions Where They Fall
By Robert Fisk
War crimes? Of course, we can all make moral assessments. Eliminated in the most humane way... The Taliban are not as bad as the Nazis. But they are much worse than the Danes. Isn't that right? What is this life?

Islamophobia In Western Media By Stephen Lendman
Post-9/11, Western media, especially in America and Britain, describe Muslims as fundamentalists, extremists, terrorists, and fanatics. Throughout the West, Islam is identified with violence, when, in fact it has common roots with Christianity and Judaism. Their tenets are based on love, not hate; peace, not violence; charity, not exploitation; and a just, fair society for people of all faiths. You'd never know it from Islamophobic media reports
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ord-numbers-embrace-muslim-faith-2175178.html
The Islamification of Britain: record numbers embrace Muslim faith


The number of Britons converting to Islam has doubled in 10 years. Why? Jerome Taylor and Sarah Morrison investigate

The Independent
Tuesday, 4 January 2011
mail


Hana Tajima, 23, fashion designer: "I became friends with a few Muslims in college, and was slightly affronted and curious at their lack of wanting to go out to clubs or socialise."



The number of Britons choosing to become Muslims has nearly doubled in the past decade, according to one of the most comprehensive attempts to estimate how many people have embraced Islam.

Following the global spread of violent Islamism, British Muslims have faced more scrutiny, criticism and analysis than any other religious community. Yet, despite the often negative portrayal of Islam, thousands of Britons are adopting the religion every year.
Estimating the number of converts living in Britain has always been difficult because census data does not differentiate between whether a religious person has adopted a new faith or was born into it. Previous estimates have placed the number of Muslim converts in the UK at between 14,000 and 25,000.
But a new study by the inter-faith think-tank Faith Matters suggests the real figure could be as high as 100,000, with as many as 5,000 new conversions nationwide each year.
By using data from the Scottish 2001 census – the only survey to ask respondents what their religion was at birth as well as at the time of the survey – researchers broke down what proportion of Muslim converts there were by ethnicity and then extrapolated the figures for Britain as a whole.
In all they estimated that there were 60,699 converts living in Britain in 2001. With no new census planned until next year, researchers polled mosques in London to try to calculate how many conversions take place a year. The results gave a figure of 1,400 conversions in the capital in the past 12 months which, when extrapolated nationwide, would mean approximately 5,200 people adopting Islam every year. The figures are comparable with studies in Germany and France which found that there were around 4,000 conversions a year.
Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, admitted that coming up with a reliable estimate of the number of converts to Islam was notoriously difficult. "This report is the best intellectual 'guestimate' using census numbers, local authority data and polling from mosques," he said. "Either way few people doubt that the number adopting Islam in the UK has risen dramatically in the past 10 years."
Asked why people were converting in such large numbers he replied: "I think there is definitely a relationship between conversions being on the increase and the prominence of Islam in the public domain. People are interested in finding out what Islam is all about and when they do that they go in different directions. Most shrug their shoulders and return to their lives but some will inevitably end up liking what they discover and will convert."



here is the complete story!...............




http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ord-numbers-embrace-muslim-faith-2175178.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...race-muslim-faith-2175178.html?action=Gallery
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
http://listverse.com/2008/06/09/top-10-reasons-the-dark-ages-were-not-dark/


I'll fully admit that the Muslims did contribute mathematics, but really, most of the major revolutions in the so called "dark ages" were purely European.


I also highly recommend this book. I've read it and it lays the argument out in greater detail:


http://www.amazon.com/Inheritance-Rome-Illuminating-Dark-400-1000/dp/0143117424/ref=pd_sim_b_1

No need for delving in unauthentic and biased ''new history''....read about Dark Ages in some school book and you will come to know the truth.

Aslo if you find a book on social history of England or Europe, read it and judge for yourself where the West stood in dark ages!
here is something about it by wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Islamic interactions

The Byzantine Empire initially provided the medieval Islamic world with Ancient Greek texts on astronomy and mathematics for translation into Arabic as the Empire was the leading center of scientific scholarship in the region in the early Middle Ages. Later as the Muslim world became the center of scientific knowledge, Byzantine scientists such as Gregory Choniades translated Arabic texts on Islamic astronomy, mathematics and science into Medieval Greek, including the works of Ja'far ibn Muhammad Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi, Ibn Yunus, al-Khazini (a Muslim scientist of Byzantine Greek descent),[22] Muhammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī[23] and Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī among others. There were also some Byzantine scientists who used Arabic transliterations to describe certain scientific concepts instead of the equivalent Ancient Greek terms (such as the use of the Arabic talei instead of the Ancient Greek hososcopus). Byzantine science thus played an important role in not only transmitting ancient Greek knowledge to Western Europe and the Islamic world, but in also transmitting Islamic knowledge to Western Europe, such as the transmission of the Tusi-couple, which later appeared in the work of Nicolaus Copernicus.[21] Byzantine scientists also became acquainted with Sassanid and Indian astronomy through citations in some Arabic works.[22]


more...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_Middle_Ages
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
According to most historians, the modern scientific method was first developed by Islamic scientists, pioneered by Ibn Al-Haytham, known to the west as “Alhazen”.[4] Robert Briffault, in The Making of Humanity, asserts that the very existence of science, as it is understood in the modern sense, is rooted in the scientific thought and knowledge that emerged in Islamic civilizations during this time.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_science

This is so true.

The islamic world invented the number zero for example.

A number that we all take for granted, but for 6000 years human civilization without it lived impeded.
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
Islamic interactions

The Byzantine Empire initially provided the medieval Islamic world with Ancient Greek texts on astronomy and mathematics for translation into Arabic as the Empire was the leading center of scientific scholarship in the region in the early Middle Ages. Later as the Muslim world became the center of scientific knowledge, Byzantine scientists such as Gregory Choniades translated Arabic texts on Islamic astronomy, mathematics and science into Medieval Greek, including the works of Ja'far ibn Muhammad Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi, Ibn Yunus, al-Khazini (a Muslim scientist of Byzantine Greek descent),[22] Muhammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī[23] and Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī among others. There were also some Byzantine scientists who used Arabic transliterations to describe certain scientific concepts instead of the equivalent Ancient Greek terms (such as the use of the Arabic talei instead of the Ancient Greek hososcopus). Byzantine science thus played an important role in not only transmitting ancient Greek knowledge to Western Europe and the Islamic world, but in also transmitting Islamic knowledge to Western Europe, such as the transmission of the Tusi-couple, which later appeared in the work of Nicolaus Copernicus.[21] Byzantine scientists also became acquainted with Sassanid and Indian astronomy through citations in some Arabic works.[22]


more...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_Middle_Ages

so christianity has moved forward and islam has gone backwards?
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Your comments show absolute ignorance of Muslims and their religion. For your guidance Muslims believe they are a Universal Nation and the whole world is their home! You should never, never,expect a Muslim to give up his religion or culture as far as it is guided(or misguided) by the Quran!! Moreover, It is over-simplification to assert that ALL Muslims are terrorists or Islam is not a religion of Peace. That's not true.
The British ruled over India for about 150 years but they never interfered in religious matters of the natives...mostly Hindus and Muslims (mostly converts from Hinduism)...the British really understood the sentiments of these people as far as their religion was concerned so they avoided to interfere and continue their rule...and prolong it as long as possible until national sentiment grew against them and they had to be kicked out. This obviously gives a message to others that they should keep to themselves without
fiddling with the religion of others or trying to suppress its adherents in any way, especially through force.
What is happening is all due to interference by one party in the affairs of the other party and as I said Muslims have a Universal Brotherhood (this is the spirit of Islam) the more you try to crush them they will get stronger!!

Apart from religious beliefs, the Muslim have nothing uncommon with the natives....However, Islam is strictly against open sex or mixing up of genders. This should be a problem because Muslims respect this 'custom and culture' of natives and infact enjoy the sexy scenes. Secondly, no Muslim will ever eat pig even if you forced him to do that!! he will revolt! Then a Muslim is allowed to take 4 wives instead of committing debauchery or getting involved in illicit sex...the native may have objection to that but Muslim don't mind it at all. they want you to carry on with your 'culture'' but at the same time want you not to object to theirs.

Could you enumerate the cultural values you want Muslims to stick to? excluding ,of ,sexual aberration/freedom that natives enjoy among themselves as that would be beyond acceptance by Muslims!

I haven't said this much.

But that was a very accurate and incitive post.

But in the end, it was ignorance that toppled the Indian wing of the British empire. The coating of musket cartridges in pig\cow fat for one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Thats....what...i've been saying...



So, you agree that Muslims in the West are living as per Laws there, I really do not understand what's the fuss about then??




Can you tell me which sect of Christians is correct??

I can see that you have absolutely vague knowledge about Islam, therefore for you guidance and answer to your inquisitiveness I am posting the following article (url) written by a non-Muslim about Muslim and sects, etc, and I am sure you will enjoy reading it.
Be it clear that I do not agree with the observations of the author in toto and have my own reservations.


Debating Jihad
By Yoginder Sikand
Contrary to popularly held views about jihad is what some Muslim scholars insist is the true Quranic understanding of the term: struggle or sincere and sustained efforts in the path of God. Such jihadic struggles and efforts, they point out, need not necessarily be directed against non-Muslims, and they are also not necessarily all violent



and this.....

Bombs Make No Moral Distinctions Where They Fall
By Robert Fisk
War crimes? Of course, we can all make moral assessments. Eliminated in the most humane way... The Taliban are not as bad as the Nazis. But they are much worse than the Danes. Isn't that right? What is this life?

Islamophobia In Western Media By Stephen Lendman
Post-9/11, Western media, especially in America and Britain, describe Muslims as fundamentalists, extremists, terrorists, and fanatics. Throughout the West, Islam is identified with violence, when, in fact it has common roots with Christianity and Judaism. Their tenets are based on love, not hate; peace, not violence; charity, not exploitation; and a just, fair society for people of all faiths. You'd never know it from Islamophobic media reports
They're throwing away their own culture. That is bad.



I can't tell you which sect of Christianity is correct because they're all wrong. Just like all of the sects of Islam.



don't you understand what 'undue influence' means???



I know what the term means. They weren't forced or anything. This thing was completely voluntary and at the student's leisure. The very definition of undue influence has no meaning here. You're merely trying to sweep away the troubling answers they gave.




http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ord-numbers-embrace-muslim-faith-2175178.html
The Islamification of Britain: record numbers embrace Muslim faith


The number of Britons converting to Islam has doubled in 10 years. Why? Jerome Taylor and Sarah Morrison investigate

The Independent
Tuesday, 4 January 2011
mail


Hana Tajima, 23, fashion designer: "I became friends with a few Muslims in college, and was slightly affronted and curious at their lack of wanting to go out to clubs or socialise."



The number of Britons choosing to become Muslims has nearly doubled in the past decade, according to one of the most comprehensive attempts to estimate how many people have embraced Islam.

Following the global spread of violent Islamism, British Muslims have faced more scrutiny, criticism and analysis than any other religious community. Yet, despite the often negative portrayal of Islam, thousands of Britons are adopting the religion every year.
Estimating the number of converts living in Britain has always been difficult because census data does not differentiate between whether a religious person has adopted a new faith or was born into it. Previous estimates have placed the number of Muslim converts in the UK at between 14,000 and 25,000.
But a new study by the inter-faith think-tank Faith Matters suggests the real figure could be as high as 100,000, with as many as 5,000 new conversions nationwide each year.
By using data from the Scottish 2001 census – the only survey to ask respondents what their religion was at birth as well as at the time of the survey – researchers broke down what proportion of Muslim converts there were by ethnicity and then extrapolated the figures for Britain as a whole.
In all they estimated that there were 60,699 converts living in Britain in 2001. With no new census planned until next year, researchers polled mosques in London to try to calculate how many conversions take place a year. The results gave a figure of 1,400 conversions in the capital in the past 12 months which, when extrapolated nationwide, would mean approximately 5,200 people adopting Islam every year. The figures are comparable with studies in Germany and France which found that there were around 4,000 conversions a year.
Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, admitted that coming up with a reliable estimate of the number of converts to Islam was notoriously difficult. "This report is the best intellectual 'guestimate' using census numbers, local authority data and polling from mosques," he said. "Either way few people doubt that the number adopting Islam in the UK has risen dramatically in the past 10 years."
Asked why people were converting in such large numbers he replied: "I think there is definitely a relationship between conversions being on the increase and the prominence of Islam in the public domain. People are interested in finding out what Islam is all about and when they do that they go in different directions. Most shrug their shoulders and return to their lives but some will inevitably end up liking what they discover and will convert."



here is the complete story!...............




http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ord-numbers-embrace-muslim-faith-2175178.html
and this is bad


Britons throwing away their heritage for a middle eastern belief system.




No need for delving in unauthentic and biased ''new history''....read about Dark Ages in some school book and you will come to know the truth.

Aslo if you find a book on social history of England or Europe, read it and judge for yourself where the West stood in dark ages!
here is something about it by wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages
lmao are you joking most serious historians don't believe that the so called "dark ages" were really "dark" given the new evidence found. No serious historian has believed that for the past 30-35 years.

Nothing unauthentic about it. These are things that actually happened.



You can claim all of the "scientific advances" you want. Sort of doesn't change the fact that the middle east is a bucket of shit now.



This is so true.

The islamic world invented the number zero for example.

A number that we all take for granted, but for 6000 years human civilization without it lived impeded.
uh


no


Complicated mathematics and theorems existed before the number zero. The greatest ancient European civilizations didn't need it, apparently.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
They're throwing away their own culture. That is bad.



I can't tell you which sect of Christianity is correct because they're all wrong. Just like all of the sects of Islam.







I know what the term means. They weren't forced or anything. This thing was completely voluntary and at the student's leisure. The very definition of undue influence has no meaning here. You're merely trying to sweep away the troubling answers they gave.





and this is bad


Britons throwing away their heritage for a middle eastern belief system.




lmao are you joking most serious historians don't believe that the so called "dark ages" were really "dark" given the new evidence found. No serious historian has believed that for the past 30-35 years.

Nothing unauthentic about it. These are things that actually happened.



You can claim all of the "scientific advances" you want. Sort of doesn't change the fact that the middle east is a bucket of shit now.




uh


no


Complicated mathematics and theorems existed before the number zero. The greatest ancient European civilizations didn't need it, apparently.

wtf are you talking about.

The dark ages happened after the fall of the western roman empire, this isn't debatable.

The number zero was a huge step forward in mathematics and culture this isn't debatable.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top