Ok, so ban it in the public arena.
Ed, outstanding video. I wanted to hear more. Went to You Tube, logged it in my playlist and will go back later to listen to other Sam Harris clips.
Regarding Islam, I'm not an expert on it. I've heard on many occasions that the basis of Islam is peaceful. Unfortunately the news is dominated not by the acts of peaceful Muslims but the acts of fanatical Muslims who believe it is their way or the highway. Or in a more specific way- if you say something bad about my religion I have God's blessing to kill you. Or Muslims who view the followers of other religions as infidels or heretics that should be treated like criminals. At least that is my impression.
If you look into the Old Testament of the Bible, by today's standards it can be harsh, but I believe most modern Christians don't live by the Old Testament standard. Probably the same thing can be said about the Quran. What ever it says, it's the people following it that pick and choose what they want to believe. I do believe it is possible to be a live-and-let-live Muslim. But I also believe that in the Middle East, in the countries ruled by Islamic law, those types of Muslims are few and far between. Who determines the standard? The people practicing the religion.
well if you think it is violent, imperialistic, abusive towards women and expansionist why would you want it in your country?you can't ban a religion, people should be free to follow whatever religion they choose.
well if you think it is violent, imperialistic, abusive towards women and expansionist why would you want it in your country?
Oh
thats right
"tolerance"
No, see, you do tolerate themYou don't tolerate those things though, it's not that hard to get.
There are laws against violent misogyny and the other practices you described, and one of the beautiful things about equality is that nobody is free of them.
well if you think it is violent, imperialistic, abusive towards women and expansionist why would you want it in your country?
Oh
thats right
"tolerance"
you really think most Mulsims are not extreme?
depends upon the definition of extreme I suppose
Just disrespect Muhammad and see how tolerant they are.
Tolerance requires give and take on both sides. I don't see that from Muslims for the most part
No, see, you do tolerate them
It comes down to two options for Muslims:
Assimilation: Forget your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. Slowly become one of the people that really have no culture besides what they can get from the TV and mass media. Leave behind what made your ancestors different and great in order to become assimilated and you will naturally have less problems with the native population.
Preservation: Maintain your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. However, with this comes the fact that you will be an outsider. You will really have no connection with the native population since you're busy keeping your way of life alive. Especially if the native culture has much different ways of doing things from yourself.
These two paths to choose from aren't good. Your choices is to either leave who you are behind and join someone else (cultural genocide) or maintain who you are and be relegated to minority status since no one really has anything in common with you culturally.. Diversity is ultimately genocide because we urge them to assimilate or we "tolerate them" so they can remain who they are, but now they will be so different from us that they stick out like a red penguin. The problem is not Muslims, the problem is diversity. When you replace a native population's values, culture and customs because you are "diverse", then you're also committing cultural genocide on the native population to look "tolerant". It is a double edged sword that wounds both parties.
there is a middle ground, in Canada we have millions of moderate muslims living peacefully, next to other faiths, they do not impose strict Sharia law, they do not insist on the wearing of the hijab, in fact they are so damned peaceful and have integrated so nicely into our society that they never make the news, the media never reports on these peopleNo, see, you do tolerate them
It comes down to two options for Muslims:
Assimilation: Forget your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. Slowly become one of the people that really have no culture besides what they can get from the TV and mass media. Leave behind what made your ancestors different and great in order to become assimilated and you will naturally have less problems with the native population.
Preservation: Maintain your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. However, with this comes the fact that you will be an outsider. You will really have no connection with the native population since you're busy keeping your way of life alive. Especially if the native culture has much different ways of doing things from yourself.
These two paths to choose from aren't good. Your choices is to either leave who you are behind and join someone else (cultural genocide) or maintain who you are and be relegated to minority status since no one really has anything in common with you culturally.. Diversity is ultimately genocide because we urge them to assimilate or we "tolerate them" so they can remain who they are, but now they will be so different from us that they stick out like a red penguin. The problem is not Muslims, the problem is diversity. When you replace a native population's values, culture and customs because you are "diverse", then you're also committing cultural genocide on the native population to look "tolerant". It is a double edged sword that wounds both parties.
No, see, you do tolerate them
It comes down to two options for Muslims:
Assimilation: Forget your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. Slowly become one of the people that really have no culture besides what they can get from the TV and mass media. Leave behind what made your ancestors different and great in order to become assimilated and you will naturally have less problems with the native population.
Preservation: Maintain your culture, your rituals, customs, language, heritage, history, and values. However, with this comes the fact that you will be an outsider. You will really have no connection with the native population since you're busy keeping your way of life alive. Especially if the native culture has much different ways of doing things from yourself.
These two paths to choose from aren't good. Your choices is to either leave who you are behind and join someone else (cultural genocide) or maintain who you are and be relegated to minority status since no one really has anything in common with you culturally.. Diversity is ultimately genocide because we urge them to assimilate or we "tolerate them" so they can remain who they are, but now they will be so different from us that they stick out like a red penguin. The problem is not Muslims, the problem is diversity. When you replace a native population's values, culture and customs because you are "diverse", then you're also committing cultural genocide on the native population to look "tolerant". It is a double edged sword that wounds both parties.
there is a middle ground, in Canada we have millions of moderate muslims living peacefully, next to other faiths, they do not impose strict Sharia law, they do not insist on the wearing of the hijab, in fact they are so damned peaceful and have integrated so nicely into our society that they never make the news, the media never reports on these people
In Spain where I live muslims are not only very tolerated, they are an integral part of this region's history. In my barrio we have a mosque and a few halal shops and other muslim friendly places. They are peaceful, friendly and generally nice. The mosque is so small compared to the massive church beside it, at prayer time they have to lay rugs out on the street outside for the overspill to pray on. It's actually quite cute and there's a very tranquil air around it.
As long as that's the case I have no problem at all. Muslims here aren't extremists, not even close, the women do not walk behind the men and they can leave their house without accompaniment. The far majority of muslims in the world are not extreme, and these people should be welcomed more, so as to stop them moving to toward the extreme ends of the religion.
The case here is not to ban nor suppress, but to encourage a more civilised interpretation of the religion, moderated by egalitarian civil law.
This is where you and I differ.
I don't look at muslims and think its a war between us and them... There is no them in my world, just us.
Guess what? I still eat fish and chips and drink warm beer. Some muslims do as well, and some don't. Fair play to whatever they want to do, as long as they don't infringe upon anyone elses liberty.
You don't tolerate those things though, it's not that hard to get.
There are laws against violent misogyny and the other practices you described, and one of the beautiful things about equality is that nobody is free of them.
Spain proves to take a more sensible and positive view of the minorities as compared to the US or other western countries and I appreciate it.
Although the Muslims ruled over Spain for more than 800 years they don't claim proprietorship to it....If someone has read the Spanish history they will realize how tolerant Muslims were to Jews and Christians. Infact most of their governors were Jews because the Muslims did not have enough men to appoint to that post!! Muslim rule over Spain was also the beginning of scientific, technological and literary advancement because at that time Europe was plunged into Dark Ages!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.