9/11 conspiracy theorists

dt3 said:
Let just say personal experience and leave it at that ;)
Click to expand...

Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D


All Else Failed said:
They absolutely do not. The 757 is much much bigger than the hawk.
Click to expand...

Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D




Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
Click to expand...
I posted the dimensions right before you posted this, take a look. That photo is misleading.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D




Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
Click to expand...
you can't be serious with this statement.

Look at the picture dt3 just posted. You have to be mentally ill to confuse the two.
 
dt3 said:
It's a close angle with nothing close by for reference. Here's a better one:

Untitled.jpg
Click to expand...

Ah, thanks for clearing that one up :)

All Else Failed said:
you can't be serious with this statement.

Look at the picture dt3 just posted. You have to be mentally ill to confuse the two.
Click to expand...

I swear man, you question my intelligence one more time, and I'm gonna go all out on your ass. I've had it with you degrading me. I've got enough shit with my sister, I don't need you on my fucking case. At least Donnie is being reasonable about this shit. Like he said, it's a misleading picture, and seeing the second picture he posted, I see what he meant by the two being different sizes. Get off my damn back.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
Ah, thanks for clearing that one up :)



I swear man, you question my intelligence one more time, and I'm gonna go all out on your ass. I've had it with you degrading me. I've got enough shit with my sister, I don't need you on my fucking case. At least Donnie is being reasonable about this shit. Like he said, it's a misleading picture, and seeing the second picture he posted, I see what he meant by the two being different sizes. Get off my damn back.
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just saying that I seriously don't know how you can confuse a full sized jumbo jet with somehting thats the size of a medium sized truck with a trailer.....plus, didn't YOU call me stupid in this very thread? yup.
 
All Else Failed said:
I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just saying that I seriously don't know how you can confuse a full sized jumbo jet with somehting thats the size of a medium sized truck with a trailer.....plus, didn't YOU call me stupid in this very thread? yup.
Click to expand...

I called you stupid ONE time, because you did say something that contradicted what you said in that same paragraph. Maybe I read it wrong, but that's over with. You've called me retarded and mentally ill in this thread, only across the span of 2 pages. As Donnie said, it's a misleading picture. From the angle of the picture I had, I couldn't honestly tell the size difference, so as soon as I saw the picture he posted, I knew I was wrong. I don't need you questiong my damn intelligence. If I really was as mentally ill and retarded as you're making me out to be, do you really think I could continue this debate for 5+ pages.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
I called you stupid ONE time, because you did say something that contradicted what you said in that same paragraph. Maybe I read it wrong, but that's over with. You've called me retarded and mentally ill in this thread, only across the span of 2 pages. As Donnie said, it's a misleading picture. From the angle of the picture I had, I couldn't honestly tell the size difference, so as soon as I saw the picture he posted, I knew I was wrong. I don't need you questiong my damn intelligence. If I really was as mentally ill and retarded as you're making me out to be, do you really think I could continue this debate for 5+ pages.
Click to expand...
I said nothing that contradicted itself if you read my statement after you accused me of being stupid.


I'm just saying that all of these conspiracy theories seem very, very convincing at first, but when you actually consider all of the evidence they lose all of their water when applied to the data.
 
All Else Failed said:
I said nothing that contradicted itself if you read my statement after you accused me of being stupid.


I'm just saying that all of these conspiracy theories seem very, very convincing at first, but when you actually consider all of the evidence they lose all of their water when applied to the data.
Click to expand...

Well then you worded the post wrong. You said that the fighter jets are stronger, and the Pentagon's wall is stronger, which means a commercial jet liner couldn't penetrate it, or something along the lines of that. That does contradict itself.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
Well then you worded the post wrong. You said that the fighter jets are stronger, and the Pentagon's wall is stronger, which means a commercial jet liner couldn't penetrate it, or something along the lines of that. That does contradict itself.
Click to expand...
Then I said that while the pentagon's walls are stronger, they had partitions in them that made some spots weak, where the fuselage of the plane punctured, and the wings got atomized when they hit the stronger parts.
 
All Else Failed said:
Which ones?
Click to expand...

Ok, in the 70's I believe, the Chicago Tower was hit by a plane. Dead on hit, just like the Twin Towers. The tower burned for 36 hours straight, and still didn't collapse. Why, if we live in such an advanced day and age now, did these towers collapse after burning for less than 30 minutes each?

What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.

Those are just a few.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
Ok, in the 70's I believe, the Chicago Tower was hit by a plane. Dead on hit, just like the Twin Towers. The tower burned for 36 hours straight, and still didn't collapse. Why, if we live in such an advanced day and age now, did these towers collapse after burning for less than 30 minutes each?

What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.

Those are just a few.
Click to expand...
Notice what kind of airplane hit it though.


Various demolition experts watch the footage and unanimously concluded that it looked NOTHING like demo charges being set off. My uncle's freind is a demo technician, and he said they looked completely opposite of what demo charges going off would look like.
 
Dodge_Sniper said:
What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.
Click to expand...

Just a question.
Are you saying these buildings were pre-rigged with explosives just in case they ever needed to be hastily brought down, or are you saying that people rushed in after the planes hit and set-up explosives for a controlled demo?
 
Back
Top