9/11 conspiracy theorists

Users who are viewing this thread

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Let just say personal experience and leave it at that ;)

Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D


They absolutely do not. The 757 is much much bigger than the hawk.

Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
 
  • 141
    Replies
  • 3K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D




Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
I posted the dimensions right before you posted this, take a look. That photo is misleading.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Not at liberty to discuss it eh? :D




Did you see the fucking size of that black Global Hawk? It's like a fucking 757! Maybe a bit smaller, but not that much. And if I didn't know what I was looking for, first glance, I'd say that was a 757, before seeing the tail section. But you are the engineer of the forum, you know everything, and I'm just shit :)
you can't be serious with this statement.

Look at the picture dt3 just posted. You have to be mentally ill to confuse the two.
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
Ah aluminum eh?Good to know. Im 30000 some odd feet in the air. Riding on something I use to wrap my sandwiches with. Great....

wings in flight need to bend and flex......hence the alloys......steel is rigid so wings made of steel would probably snap
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
It's a close angle with nothing close by for reference. Here's a better one:

Untitled.jpg

Ah, thanks for clearing that one up :)

you can't be serious with this statement.

Look at the picture dt3 just posted. You have to be mentally ill to confuse the two.

I swear man, you question my intelligence one more time, and I'm gonna go all out on your ass. I've had it with you degrading me. I've got enough shit with my sister, I don't need you on my fucking case. At least Donnie is being reasonable about this shit. Like he said, it's a misleading picture, and seeing the second picture he posted, I see what he meant by the two being different sizes. Get off my damn back.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Ah, thanks for clearing that one up :)



I swear man, you question my intelligence one more time, and I'm gonna go all out on your ass. I've had it with you degrading me. I've got enough shit with my sister, I don't need you on my fucking case. At least Donnie is being reasonable about this shit. Like he said, it's a misleading picture, and seeing the second picture he posted, I see what he meant by the two being different sizes. Get off my damn back.
I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just saying that I seriously don't know how you can confuse a full sized jumbo jet with somehting thats the size of a medium sized truck with a trailer.....plus, didn't YOU call me stupid in this very thread? yup.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just saying that I seriously don't know how you can confuse a full sized jumbo jet with somehting thats the size of a medium sized truck with a trailer.....plus, didn't YOU call me stupid in this very thread? yup.

I called you stupid ONE time, because you did say something that contradicted what you said in that same paragraph. Maybe I read it wrong, but that's over with. You've called me retarded and mentally ill in this thread, only across the span of 2 pages. As Donnie said, it's a misleading picture. From the angle of the picture I had, I couldn't honestly tell the size difference, so as soon as I saw the picture he posted, I knew I was wrong. I don't need you questiong my damn intelligence. If I really was as mentally ill and retarded as you're making me out to be, do you really think I could continue this debate for 5+ pages.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
I called you stupid ONE time, because you did say something that contradicted what you said in that same paragraph. Maybe I read it wrong, but that's over with. You've called me retarded and mentally ill in this thread, only across the span of 2 pages. As Donnie said, it's a misleading picture. From the angle of the picture I had, I couldn't honestly tell the size difference, so as soon as I saw the picture he posted, I knew I was wrong. I don't need you questiong my damn intelligence. If I really was as mentally ill and retarded as you're making me out to be, do you really think I could continue this debate for 5+ pages.
I said nothing that contradicted itself if you read my statement after you accused me of being stupid.


I'm just saying that all of these conspiracy theories seem very, very convincing at first, but when you actually consider all of the evidence they lose all of their water when applied to the data.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I said nothing that contradicted itself if you read my statement after you accused me of being stupid.


I'm just saying that all of these conspiracy theories seem very, very convincing at first, but when you actually consider all of the evidence they lose all of their water when applied to the data.

Well then you worded the post wrong. You said that the fighter jets are stronger, and the Pentagon's wall is stronger, which means a commercial jet liner couldn't penetrate it, or something along the lines of that. That does contradict itself.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Well then you worded the post wrong. You said that the fighter jets are stronger, and the Pentagon's wall is stronger, which means a commercial jet liner couldn't penetrate it, or something along the lines of that. That does contradict itself.
Then I said that while the pentagon's walls are stronger, they had partitions in them that made some spots weak, where the fuselage of the plane punctured, and the wings got atomized when they hit the stronger parts.
 

Dodge_Sniper

Active Member
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Which ones?

Ok, in the 70's I believe, the Chicago Tower was hit by a plane. Dead on hit, just like the Twin Towers. The tower burned for 36 hours straight, and still didn't collapse. Why, if we live in such an advanced day and age now, did these towers collapse after burning for less than 30 minutes each?

What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.

Those are just a few.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Ok, in the 70's I believe, the Chicago Tower was hit by a plane. Dead on hit, just like the Twin Towers. The tower burned for 36 hours straight, and still didn't collapse. Why, if we live in such an advanced day and age now, did these towers collapse after burning for less than 30 minutes each?

What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.

Those are just a few.
Notice what kind of airplane hit it though.


Various demolition experts watch the footage and unanimously concluded that it looked NOTHING like demo charges being set off. My uncle's freind is a demo technician, and he said they looked completely opposite of what demo charges going off would look like.
 

Maulds

Accidental Bastard
Messages
10,330
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.01z
What's the deal with the flashes as the towers collapse? Controlled demolition is my guess. The towers became too weak or damaged, so our own government ordered them to be brought down. WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition if I've ever seen one.

Just a question.
Are you saying these buildings were pre-rigged with explosives just in case they ever needed to be hastily brought down, or are you saying that people rushed in after the planes hit and set-up explosives for a controlled demo?
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top