“Guantanamo Bay prison should be closed down immediately”.

[mazHur]

True indeed...and to further you are merely responding to his posts..he "created" the debate himself.

Two big fools, two stooges, two leg pullers talking to each other and getting nowhere!! shame on them!

Here's some fodder for you ...
Sen. Kelly Ayotte on the Bergdahl deal: "With 29 percent of former Guantanamo detainees having reengaged or being suspected of reengaging in terrorism, the administration's decision to release these five terrorist detainees endangers U.S. national security interests... It also sets a precedent that could encourage our enemies to capture more Americans in order to gain concessions from our government."


Yet another reason to close down Gitmo!!

 

[mazHur]

I see frustration for Maz today...I expect he is arming himself with animal porn as we speak.

Yesternight I saw that white woman in my dream,,the poor lady was crying and cussing the whitey men standing by while she was gettin ass fucked by a big black burly dog!

I gave her a 100 dollar bill and told her to go see ''good folks'' like you to get 'redressed'' and see if they could provide you with some 'replacement'!!

 

[mazHur]

Gitmo has done more bad than good!! About 30 detainees have again taken on to fighting and avenging their capture!!


And here's what some senators who spoke to the NYT's Michael Shear and Jeremy Peters last night said after the briefing: "Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, exited the briefing visibly angry and said he left with more questions than answers. 'I think we can all agree we're not dealing with a war hero here,' he said.


"Senator Ayotte said she remained concerned about what she called the five 'high risk detainees. 'I'm not satisfied with their ability to prevent them from re-engaging in the fight,' she said. 'I think that is one of the things that worries me most.'

 

[The Man]

Two big fools, two stooges, two leg pullers talking to each other and getting nowhere!! shame on them!

Here's some fodder for you ...
Sen. Kelly Ayotte on the Bergdahl deal: "With 29 percent of former Guantanamo detainees having reengaged or being suspected of reengaging in terrorism, the administration's decision to release these five terrorist detainees endangers U.S. national security interests... It also sets a precedent that could encourage our enemies to capture more Americans in order to gain concessions from our government."


Yet another reason to close down Gitmo!!

Are you ignorant?

 

[mazHur]

Are you ignorant?

What do you mean, dude?? are you drunk or beaten up by your wife??

 

[The Man]

With 29 percent of former Guantanamo detainees having reengaged or being suspected of reengaging in terrorism, the administration's decision to release these five terrorist detainees endangers U.S. national security interests... It also sets a precedent that could encourage our enemies to capture more Americans in order to gain concessions from our government."
Yet another reason to close down Gitmo!!

Do you understand what you read?...or are you a terrorist supporter.

 

[The Man]

What do you mean, dude?? are you drunk or beaten up by your wife??

I couldnt have made it any simpler.

 

[mazHur]

Do you understand what you read?...or are you a terrorist supporter.

What you construe is bigoted and vane..

Avail some sense from this...


The real Bergdahl scandal: What about the other Gitmo detainees?
FALGUNI A. SHETH

Prisoner swap proves Guantanamo detainees can easily be released. So why on earth are they still imprisoned?

 

[mazHur]

I couldnt have made it any simpler.

you are a moth eaten tramp, a dick head of sorts!! Grow up, baby, and learn to debate from some good men!!

 

[The Man]

Prisoner swap proves Guantanamo detainees can easily be released. So why on earth are they still imprisoned?

Did you not state they they will terrorize again?
Thus why they are locked up maz.

 

[Stone]

Yesternight I saw that white woman in my dream,,the poor lady was crying and cussing the whitey men standing by while she was gettin ass fucked by a big black burly dog!

I gave her a 100 dollar bill and told her to go see ''good folks'' like you to get 'redressed'' and see if they could provide you with some 'replacement'!!


...............................

If you had changed colors, liberals would be calling you a racist, too.

 

[Stone]

Gitmo has done more bad than good!! About 30 detainees have again taken on to fighting and avenging their capture!!


And here's what some senators who spoke to the NYT's Michael Shear and Jeremy Peters last night said after the briefing: "Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, exited the briefing visibly angry and said he left with more questions than answers. 'I think we can all agree we're not dealing with a war hero here,' he said.


"Senator Ayotte said she remained concerned about what she called the five 'high risk detainees. 'I'm not satisfied with their ability to prevent them from re-engaging in the fight,' she said. 'I think that is one of the things that worries me most.'

I often wonder if you understand what you are copy and pasting.

 

[Stone]

What you construe is bigoted and vane..

Avail some sense from this...


The real Bergdahl scandal: What about the other Gitmo detainees?
FALGUNI A. SHETH

Prisoner swap proves Guantanamo detainees can easily be released. So why on earth are they still imprisoned?

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

 

[Stone]

you are a moth eaten tramp, a dick head of sorts!! Grow up, baby, and learn to debate from some good men!!

You are looking desperate.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and lame excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and lame excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.

 

[mazHur]

There is little sense to the article. The question is rhetorical and it's logic fallacious.

The Taliban wanted certain terrorists released and Obama wanted to be seen as a peace maker like the phoney Carter.
But Obama cut a really bad deal and it's coming back to haunt him.

excuses , excuses and lame excuses
accusations, accusations and aspersions
this is all you could do.

there is no need for you to be apologetic....
Obama is not so naive as to release hardened terrorists for the sake of 'peace'..that's is foolish thinking of yours.
Were it as simple as you said there wouldn't be a row over this matter in your own country,,,it clearly reflects 'defeat' at your end, defeat of American war on so called 'terror'....

It also shows how powerful and dominating the Taliban are over you and have the strength to mold your decisions in their favor.