The Gays issue. Are we in the West just another Iran?

[mazHur]

maz you googled the word "Gay" not "Eunuch" *face palm*

All of them are chips of the same block!!
Eunuchs are recessive... which makes them equally 'gay' which is a relatively recently coined term for
sexually perverted people other than straight men and women!! That's my understanding of them all, as also obvious from the cyclopedic research and ancient literature, such as Kok Shastra and some other ancient works by philosophers

[FONT=georgia, bookman old style, palatino linotype, book antiqua, palatino, trebuchet ms, helvetica, garamond, sans-serif, arial, verdana, avante garde, century gothic, comic sans ms, times, times new roman, serif]Do not do an immoral thing for moral reasons. ~Thomas Hardy, Jude the Obscure, 1875[/FONT]

 

[darkangel]

All of them are chips of the same block!!
Eunuchs are recessive... which makes them equally 'gay' which is a relatively recently coined term for
sexually perverted people other than straight men and women!! That's my understanding of them all, as also obvious from the cyclopedic research and ancient literature, such as Kok Shastra and some other ancient works by philosophers

Your understanding is wrong. Next time google a better site....

Definition of EUNUCH

1
: a castrated man placed in charge of a harem or employed as a chamberlain in a palace

2
: a man or boy deprived of the testes or external genitals

3
: one that lacks virility or power <political eunuchs>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eunuch

So a castrated man is a sexually perverted person? You just stated that and nowhere in the definition does it say that. Get your facts straight maz...

Do not do an immoral thing for moral reasons. ~Thomas Hardy, Jude the Obscure, 1875

You're living in ancient times maz!!!

 

[AnnaBabyx]

All of them are chips of the same block!!
Eunuchs are recessive... which makes them equally 'gay' which is a relatively recently coined term for
sexually perverted people other than straight men and women!! That's my understanding of them all, as also obvious from the cyclopedic research and ancient literature, such as Kok Shastra and some other ancient works by philosophers

[FONT=georgia, bookman old style, palatino linotype, book antiqua, palatino, trebuchet ms, helvetica, garamond, sans-serif, arial, verdana, avante garde, century gothic, comic sans ms, times, times new roman, serif]Do not do an immoral thing for moral reasons. ~Thomas Hardy, Jude the Obscure, 1875[/FONT]

Was that in 1875 then,it's 2010 about 2011 now?. :thumbup

 

[darkangel]

Was that in 1875 then,it's 2010 about 2011 now?. :thumbup

maz is stuck in time.....

 

[AnnaBabyx]

maz is stuck in time.....

I know. :thumbdown

 

[shelgarr]

Let me get this straight - Larry King is getting his 8th divorce, Elizabeth Taylor is possibly getting married for a 9th time, Britney Spears has a 55 hour marriage, Jesse James and Tiger Woods are screwing EVERYTHING yet homosexual marriage is going to show disrespect to hetrosexual marriage?

They aren't very good examples of true marriage. And if we're going to go along those lines why the hell are gays fighting to be married?!

The act of gay relationships and gay unions is a perfectly acceptable solution. The act of insisting on calling it marriage is disrespectful to those of us heteros that are trying very hard to do it right.

 

[mazHur]

Your understanding is wrong. Next time google a better site....



http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eunuch

I know who an eunuch is. Can still see some around doing all that perverts do.
The word 'gay' is a later label attached to all those men and women who are sexually oriented towards the same
sex or are for the same sex.

So a castrated man is a sexually perverted person? You just stated that and nowhere in the definition does it say that. Get your facts straight maz...

Castrated men were usually slaves, held by kings etc to guard their women .....and yes, they were also perverts
being passive against their inability to be active, the same way gays are.

You're living in ancient times maz!!!

Even though I have traveled to your country as well as many other several times, I think I will have to take another round the world trip to update me on time and the 'fuckass theory'!! But would it be worth my time ....and money???

 

[porterjack]

They aren't very good examples of true marriage. And if we're going to go along those lines why the hell are gays fighting to be married?!

The act of gay relationships and gay unions is a perfectly acceptable solution. The act of insisting on calling it marriage is disrespectful to those of us heteros that are trying very hard to do it right.

it is simple the same rules for everyone ergo no discrimination

 

[mazHur]

They aren't very good examples of true marriage. And if we're going to go along those lines why the hell are gays fighting to be married?!

The act of gay relationships and gay unions is a perfectly acceptable solution. The act of insisting on calling it marriage is disrespectful to those of us heteros that are trying very hard to do it right.

brilliant argument :24:

 

[darkangel]

The act of gay relationships and gay unions is a perfectly acceptable solution. The act of insisting on calling it marriage is disrespectful to those of us heteros that are trying very hard to do it right.

So just because you're gay means they're not trying to do it right? How is it disrespectful to heteros? Does a gay marriage bother you that much to think it's disrespectful? What are gays doing that is so wrong with seeking to be given the same rights as straight folks?

 

[mazHur]

it is simple the same rules for everyone ergo no discrimination

does it mean even children should also be given the same rights as you or me?? does it suggest that
homosexuality be taught to children in schools as a compulsory subject??? I am lost!!

 

[mazHur]

So just because you're gay means they're not trying to do it right? How is it disrespectful to heteros? Does a gay marriage bother you that much to think it's disrespectful? What are gays doing that is so wrong with seeking to be given the same rights as straight folks?

Straight people follow the line, gays circles!!

 

[darkangel]

Even though I have traveled to your country as well as many other several times, I think I will have to take another round the world trip to update me on time and the 'fuckass theory'!! But would it be worth my time ....and money???

Yes it would because you just might not see things in the same perspective. Just because you think it's a "Fuckass Theory" doesn't mean it is one. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. Unfortunately yours is the "Fuckass Theory" Only because you are not willing to open your eyes and take in both sides of the topic and are not willing to research about Gay Rights in the US. But hey that's on you if you want to remain in the blind...

 

[darkangel]

Straight people follow the line, gays circles!!

And what is that supposed to mean????

 

[mazHur]

Yes it would because you just might not see things in the same perspective. Just because you think it's a "Fuckass Theory" doesn't mean it is one. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. Unfortunately yours is the "Fuckass Theory" Only because you are not willing to open your eyes and take in both sides of the topic and are not willing to research about Gay Rights in the US. But hey that's on you if you want to remain in the blind...

Why should I?? There are always two sides to a debate. Then I don't have to think in an isolated perspective.
YOUR outlook about the 'fuckass theory' is different, good for you! Gay marriages are detestable...almost
universally...and this is the reason NO university in the world has a faculty for ''Homosexual sciences''!!

The 'theory of Equal rights' is still debatable because you cannot compare a gentleman with a goon or a
straight with a deviate!! How can then one consider them to rank them equally?? Gold and base metals are not the same, neither a horse equal to a mule....wish people understood the real intentions of democracy and the notion of Equal rights otherwise some day men would declare angels as their superiors!

I didn't say this, Billy Graham did :"All homosexuals should be castrated."

 

[mazHur]

And what is that supposed to mean????

I think that denotes the difference between the straight and the drags?

 

[darkangel]

I think that denotes the difference between the straight and the drags?

What are drags dare I ask or is that new name for gays and how so does it denote that?

You're entitled to your opinion maz but you base your opinion on something that you really quite honestly know little about besides how to bash them.

 

[shelgarr]

So just because you're gay means they're not trying to do it right? How is it disrespectful to heteros? Does a gay marriage bother you that much to think it's disrespectful? What are gays doing that is so wrong with seeking to be given the same rights as straight folks?

I'm comparing myself to the hollywood failed marriages that someone else used as examples. It's disrespectful because it's OUR definition. They have equal rights already....it just doesn't have to match the same as other to be called equal. We aren't all the same. You advocates seem to have a harder time ac cepting that than us straigahts.

 

[darkangel]

It's disrespectful because it's OUR definition. They have equal rights already....it just doesn't have to match the same as other to be called equal. We aren't all the same. You advocates seem to have a harder time ac cepting that than us straigahts.

Who's definition is OURS? And why would it bother you that gays would have ALL the same equal rights as straights? Aftreall we're all human beings that deserve to be treated completely equally in all aspects. What's so hard for YOU to accept about that? How would a Gay marriage affect you?

 

[Francis]

They aren't very good examples of true marriage. And if we're going to go along those lines why the hell are gays fighting to be married?!

The act of gay relationships and gay unions is a perfectly acceptable solution. The act of insisting on calling it marriage is disrespectful to those of us heteros that are trying very hard to do it right.

Define "very good examples" and why it is that when a bad Gay persons used are "good examples" but when hetro's that used are "bad examples" and we should not talk about them.. Seems hypocritical..