Whats taking so long?
There is zero evidence of a murder ...the jury needn't really deliberate anything.
I suppose we have some idiots in the jury who are who are trying to weigh a vacuum of evidence.
Lets use an analogy shall we.
Lets say I am in an apt...I see a guy wandering in front eying the units and I think he is suspicious...I call 911.
They are asking for descriptions and locations etc.....the guy runs.
I go to see where he went.....dispatch says we dont need you to do that...so while walking back to my house,,,the guy comes up and starts slamming my head into the sidewalk....The assailant gets shot during the attack while the one getting pounded is screaming for his life
Pretty clear case of self defense....whats to deliberate?
The state would have to show that the citizen that reported the suspicious person was trying to kill the suspicious person: in order for the suspicious person to rightfully start slamming the others head into the sidewalk.
There is zero evidence of a murder ...the jury needn't really deliberate anything.
I suppose we have some idiots in the jury who are who are trying to weigh a vacuum of evidence.
Lets use an analogy shall we.
Lets say I am in an apt...I see a guy wandering in front eying the units and I think he is suspicious...I call 911.
They are asking for descriptions and locations etc.....the guy runs.
I go to see where he went.....dispatch says we dont need you to do that...so while walking back to my house,,,the guy comes up and starts slamming my head into the sidewalk....The assailant gets shot during the attack while the one getting pounded is screaming for his life
Pretty clear case of self defense....whats to deliberate?
The state would have to show that the citizen that reported the suspicious person was trying to kill the suspicious person: in order for the suspicious person to rightfully start slamming the others head into the sidewalk.
Last edited by a moderator: