I suggest you do so, because it goes to the credibility of the film that you're promoting.
What you're essentially saying is that if someone is wrong about 1 thing, they are then wrong about everything else?
Might I remind you of the time you and others here hadn't heard of Libertarian Socialism, didn't believe it to exist as a political philosophy and didn't believe it had ever existed. I proved my case about that. Now, does that make everything you've said since wrong by association? No, of course it doesn't.
I have spent the past couple of days watching the first film, and was pretty impressed.
Part 1 deals with the fallacy of religion, shows how the Christian faith, and other faiths, are simply myths told to explain things like the changes in seasons, the zodiac etc. Very interesting.
Part 2 deals with 9/11. I've made some notes on this. There is little narration on this part, and Peter Joseph makes no claims himself, he only reports on the various 9/11 truth movement's findings. It takes the official story and breaks it apart like so:
There were no warnings about 9/11
1) NORAD had already done simulations of planes attacking the WTC.
2) Operation Mascal, Oct 2000 simulated planes hitting the Pentagon.
3) Federal Administration received 52 warnings about Al Qaeda in six months before 9/11
4) Able Danger had identified 4 of the 9/11 terrorists in the US more than a year b4 attacks. (lt col Anthony shaffer went public - and the govt tried to silence him
5) at least 12 countries warned US about imminent danger
Then it goes into the hijackers:
1) no inquiry made into $100k wired to Mohammed Atta
2) 2 terrorists lived with FBI informant prior to 9/11
3) several hijackers still alive and well (Abdulaziz al-Omari, for example) and 5 have ties to US Military institutions.
4) blatant planted evidence (such as the passport that survived and was found in the rubble...)
Osama Bin Laden
1) FBI was told not to investigate Bin Laden family in US before 9/11
2) He was already US's most wanted criminal, and still spent 2 weeks in American Hospital in Dubai in 2001.
3) No evidence has been provided that he was linked to 9/11 (The Taliban said they would hand Bin Laden over if evidence was provided, and it never materialised)
4) … other than those phony videos of him…
5) … the translation of which is under much debate, with many translators completely disagreeing that there is any admission at all
6) There are well known relations between the Bin Ladens and the Bushs.
7) … and of course their ties to the Carlyle Group
8) … with Osama's older brother Shafig bin Laden even meeting with them on the morning of 9/11
9) … the Carlyle Group being linked to the world's largest defence contractors… all of which benefited from 9/11
Pentagon
1) The alleged pilot, Han Hanjour, was a terrible pilot who couldn't even control a cessna, yet the precision needed to make the manoeuvre was incredibly difficult. One previous instructor claimed he couldn't fly at all.
2) complete lack of any remaining parts of the plane, even the jet engines. official story claims plane was "vaporised" yet bodies were able to be identified by finger prints…
3) All forensic evidence was covered up with dirt and gravel
4) No videos have been released showing the plane, in spite of a possible 80 odd CCTV cameras in the area, all videos were immediately confiscated by FBI…
5) Videos that have been refused for release to the public.
Shanksville
1) parts of plane bizarrely found several miles away.
WTC 1, 2 & 7
1) pancake theory, official story, makes no sense - the remaining pile of debris didn't show this. the central column collapsed along with the floors.
2) Buildings were designed to take impact of 707 (Les Robertson, WTC Structural Engineer) hitting at any location.
3) Manager, WTC Construction, thought building could sustain "multiple impacts."
4) the near free-fall speed highly unlikely if building fell through itself.
5) simultaneous failing of floors and columns highly unlikely.
6) Photo of a core column seen after collapse at WTC is clearly shown to have a typical angled cut associated with controlled demolitions
7) Molten metal - NASA temperature photos & Eye witness accounts - completely ignored in official report
8) Active Thermite material discovered in dust (The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009)
9) Prof Neils Harrit found Thermidic material in remains.
10) building 7 makes no sense.
11) NIST report misses a lot of vital evidence and in all 10,000 doesn't actually address the collapse.
12) not one single piece of steal analysed from WTC7
13) NIST admitted there was a period of free fall for 2.25 seconds but provide no explanation as to how this fits in with their "progressive collapse" theory.
14) explosions heard and felt BEFORE initial impact. (William Rodriguez, WTC employee)
15) smoke seen coming from basements right at impact.
16) smoke continues to bellow from basement.
17) fire fighters witness explosions as well as molten metal
18) eye witness reports of lobby being blown up as buildings evacuated.
The most telling bit is about NORAD:
NORAD
1) planes should've been intercepted. that is standard procedure.
2) interceptions usually occur within 10 minutes. On this day, it took 80 minutes to get planes airborne.
3) Massive war games taking place messing with radar, causing massive confusion
4) FAA reported the problem to NORAD and asked for assistance.
5) in 2000 Norad had 67 intercepts, 100% accuracy,
on 9/11 they failed 4 times in one day.
9/11 Commission
1) Origin of money to fund 9/11 considered of no importance to commission.
2) Commission admits it cannot explain collapse of WTC7.
3) Bush and Cheney met together and not under oath. no one allowed to attend, no recording allowed.
4) report was unanimous, if the was a disagreement it was dropped.
Terrorism
1) video points out how the Bush administration built a totally unfounded fear of terrorism to pursue their imperial goals, making wildly unfounded claims about the strength, power and organisation of Al Qaeda. Yet NOT ONE SINGLE TERRORIST CONVICTION CAME OF IT. Not one sleeper cell, not one mountain strong-hold.
2) entire foreign and domestic policy built around a myth of a constant terrorist threat.
3) Ted Gunderson, former FBI chief, goes on record pointing out the CIA's involvement in terrorist acts saying the CIA were behind most, if not all of them.
4) Terrorism used to remove civil liberties, not to mention the most basic of rights habeus corpus.
5) London 7/7: 3 trains and a bus bombed. 56 dead which coincided with anti-terror exercise dealing with exact same scenario, exact same stations.
Since 9/11
a) military spending increased 100 billion every year
b) Nearly all of the bill of rights subverted (???????)
c) two pre-emptive wars waged, estimated 800,000 civilian casualties
Not once does the maker of the video claim 9/11 to be an inside job. It's easy to come to the conclusion that the Bush administration was at the very least complicit in 9/11 - they wanted that to happen and they seemed to allow it. I think the NORAD & 9/11 Commission parts is all you need to see that.
Personally, I don't really believe the Bush govt blew up WTC. Though it's hard to understand why Thermite was found. I think it's pretty apparent that they wanted it to happen, they certainly benefited from it happening and I believe they allowed it to happen to further their imperialistic agenda.
Part III should really interest you. It goes into detail about the history of banking in the US, the history of the Federal Reserve and it's board. Definitely worth watching this part if you want to understand the Fed and the damage the private banking cartels have had on the US and the world.
(Excuse the crudity of the notes, it was a lot to take down.)
