Where will we level off after the economy has been vandalized

[Stone]

Does not lead me to my post ...but rather your own post.

Which post are you wanting me to go to and why?
Cant you just go to topic?

Here it is again for your convenience

Where will we level off after the economy has been vandalized



Where will we level off at and when?

Does not lead me to my post ...but rather your own post.

Are you claiming you did not author post #3?
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275317&viewfull=1#post2275317

which started this 'off topic' discussion.


I presented in post #2
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275261&viewfull=1#post2275261
a discussion dovetailing into your thread topic with linkage to CBO projections and analysis to give clarity to the thread topic and ended my post with the summation:

It seems apparent, scenarios of debt outpacing GDP growth are the concern.

You decided to parse my post and present a taxation argument in post 3
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275317&viewfull=1#post2275317


You need to take responsibility for your own actions :cool

 

[Stone]

Then just call me a liar.
Then prove I am a liar.

Actually you should prove me a liar then call me a liar.
How long will this take?

Already done....

 

[Stone]

Give me linkage to my posts stone to support those claims...all you are doing is creating a muddled mess.

Life is cruel for losers


I've already addressed your wacko accusations.....many times, actually........

 

[The Man]

Are you claiming you did not author post #3?
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275317&viewfull=1#post2275317

which started this 'off topic' discussion.


I presented in post #2
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275261&viewfull=1#post2275261
a discussion dovetailing into your thread topic with linkage to CBO projections and analysis to give clarity to the thread topic and ended my post with the summation:




You decided to parse my post and present a taxation argument in post 3
http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275317&viewfull=1#post2275317


You need to take responsibility for your own actions :cool

LOL..My post number 3 was in response to number 2 post
How is a rebuttal initiating off topic?..


But seriously you need to re read post number one...this could be a good thread if you understood the post

 

[The Man]

As I posted before.....your posts are obviously created out of convenience of the moment because you keep contradicting your own arguments.
..............................................................
......................................................................................


You are only debating out of convenience for the immediate conversation :cool

You have argued to further increase taxes on the middle class and decrease taxes on those that are already successful.

Where?...Give me a link
.

So why have you argued a regressive tax plan that only kicks the middle class in the teeth?

Where? .... Give me a link

Why do you continue to argue to reduce taxation on a segment of the economy that has been exceeding successful?

Other than temporarily where?...give me a link

 

[The Man]

Life is cruel for losers


I've already addressed your wacko accusations.....many times, actually........

Look above here they are again

 

[The Man]

Already done....

Dude you can call me a liar if I am a liar...stop being paranoid.

 

[The Man]

You need to take responsibility for your own actions :cool

Are you trying to say I am irresponsible?

 

[Stone]

LOL..My post number 3 was in response to number 2 post
How is a rebuttal initiating off topic?..


But seriously you need to re read post number one...this could be a good thread if you understood the post

You need to be honest with the forum, TM.
It's there for all to see.
You started this thread off topic on taxation, my involvement has been the response to your claims.
And your position is all over the economic map.
You debate out of convenience......like that $100 an hour minimum wage argument you made.

And you never did comment on my summation in post 2:

It seems apparent, scenarios of debt outpacing GDP growth are the concern.

Avoidance of reality?

 

[Stone]

Are you trying to say I am irresponsible?

Aren't you the guy that told me you and your brother took turns water boarding each other?

 

[Stone]

Dude you can call me a liar if I am a liar...stop being paranoid.

'If'?......did you miss one of my recent posts?....................( )

 

[Stone]

Look above here they are again

Yes, there they are again


And again, and again, and again.

So you didn't like my answers?
That's too bad because I'm sticking with them.

 

[Stone]

Yawn...

Not a lot of forum participation going on, that's for sure.

TM claims to want to discuss a vandalized economy, and yet ......his posts often look more like arguments to vandalize it more.
Oh well..............

 

[The Man]

Yes, there they are again


And again, and again, and again.

So you didn't like my answers?
That's too bad because I'm sticking with them.

Supply the links to support your claim....you are talking about me specifically ..so I insist you back that up

 

[The Man]

Not a lot of forum participation going on, that's for sure.

TM claims to want to discuss a vandalized economy, and yet ......his posts often look more like arguments to vandalize it more.
Oh well..............

How so?
According the the CBO report payroll tax cuts would have boomed the economy.
You know the same source you like to use

 

[Stone]

Supply the links to support your claim....you are talking about me..so I insist you back that up

<yawn>


http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275446&viewfull=1#post2275446

 

[The Man]

<yawn>


http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread...n-vandalized&p=2275446&viewfull=1#post2275446

No show me specific posts that support your claims below

You have argued to further increase taxes on the middle class and decrease taxes on those that are already successful.

I have never proposed to raise tax on the middle class and lower taxes for the rich..I support lowering taxes for all in general...can you show a post to specifically back what you claim.

So why have you argued a regressive tax plan that only kicks the middle class in the teeth?

Define a kick in the teeth?....raise taxes for the middle class?...show where I have argued in favor of such

 

[Stone]

How so?
According the the CBO report payroll tax cuts would have boomed the economy.
You know the same source you like to use

I missed the part in CBO reports that claim a regressive tax plan is productive.
I do remember statements that moderate increases of taxation on the very wealthy wouldn't have a negative impact on the economy.
In this thread, you disagree and use job creation as an argument for low tax rates on the wealthy, but that hasn't been shown to be effective since 2008.


And you do argue for tax cuts on the very wealthy and in your 'Fair Tax' thread, your argument was shown to increase taxes on the middle class while decreasing the tax load on the very wealthy.
You even posted a link to Wikipedia describing that trait of regressive taxation.......by mistake, obviously




Ah....the TM denial mode, what fun.

 

[Stone]

No show me specific posts that support your claims below

..........................

Are you a moderator?

Of course not

I've pointed to your regressive taxation thread and that's sufficient to make my point.
I don't need to waste time on what was obvious to all.
You support regressive taxation.

 

[Stone]

....................


Define a kick in the teeth?....raise taxes for the middle class?...show where I have argued in favor of such

Define a kick in the teeth?

It's a metaphor for describing the current decline of the middle class while arguing for them to carry a heavier tax load.

raise taxes for the middle class?...show where I have argued in favor of such

Asked and answered before, many times.
Your argument for regressive taxation.
You dedicated a whole thread to it.

http://www.offtopicz.net/showthread.php?86829-Fair-tax


You presented an argument that the increase of tax load on the middle class and the decrease of tax load on the wealthy was fair taxation.
That's what regressive taxes are......favoring the wealthy at the expense of the middle class.


Do you some how think my answer is going to change? You did start that thread and defend it.