Week 1 Sep 9,12,13

[AUFred]

:eek Did not notice that... I was just counting the RED teams.

This is going to be interesting.

So... looked at from a GREEN perspective, four teams have 10 wins and all of them have the same picks for Monday night.

So, it'll come down to points.

DT3 will have to make an early ruling on this for future weeks.:nod:

 

[dt3]

DT3 will have to make an early ruling on this for future weeks.:nod:

Yeah, I didn't notice until late last night. My only guess is he was predicting a tie

 

[AUFred]

Yeah, I didn't notice until late last night. My only guess is he was predicting a tie

Then he was wrong. LOL!:24:

 

[pjbleek]

I motion that if you have an incomplete week (not all picks/games) you are deemed not able to play for the week.

 

[dt3]

Looks like dkwrtw wins with a surprising upset in KC and havikng ther only tie-breaker below the total score of 35. 1700 tokenz for him.

Since there was confusion, mostly my fault, over the tie-breaker, Cam is also getting 1700 tokenz for picking 10 right and being one point over the tie-breaker.

For next week, the tie-breaker will be the way I originally posted it. Whoever is closest to the actual score, higher or lower, will win. If there is still a tie, they'll split the pot. I still think it's unfair to use whoever posted first for a tie-breaker at that point, and splitting it is the only fair way I see to do it.

 

[dt3]

I motion that if you have an incomplete week (not all picks/games) you are deemed not able to play for the week.

I don't think that's fair, if anything its a disadvantage for them. If they can pick a higher number of wins than anybody while picking less games, then more power to them. The pool is based on the number you pick right, so picking less games would make it harder to win.

 

[pjbleek]

I don't think that's fair, if anything its a disadvantage for them. If they can pick a higher number of wins than anybody while picking less games, then more power to them. The pool is based on the number you pick right, so picking less games would make it harder to win.

the one you miss might be the one that puts you over the top...but then again I have had time to think this over and agree you shouldn't be punished for missing a game...

 

[dkwrtw]

HA! :cool

 

[AUFred]

I am okay with whatever decision you make. We just need to let this set the precedence for the rest of the season.

 

[AUFred]

Looks like dkwrtw wins with a surprising upset in KC and havikng ther only tie-breaker below the total score of 35. 1700 tokenz for him.

Since there was confusion, mostly my fault, over the tie-breaker, Cam is also getting 1700 tokenz for picking 10 right and being one point over the tie-breaker.

For next week, the tie-breaker will be the way I originally posted it. Whoever is closest to the actual score, higher or lower, will win. If there is still a tie, they'll split the pot. I still think it's unfair to use whoever posted first for a tie-breaker at that point, and splitting it is the only fair way I see to do it.

Very generous of you. Good decisions.

 

[dt3]

I also gave myself 1700 for picking the exact score for the tie-breaker

 

[cam elle toe]

What'd I do.....what'd I get.....Did I do good?

and what do I do now:willy_nilly::24:

 

[dt3]

You put 200 of them in next weeks pool tomorrow

 

[cam elle toe]

You put 200 of them in next weeks pool tomorrow

I send 200 now?

and did I do good? I have NO IDEA about your footy remember...where did I come in the scheme of things this week,,,,2nd, 3rd?

 

[dt3]

Losers don't get tokenz for losing, so you must have won