Twilight: The New Moon

[AUFred]

let us know what you think!

It was better than twilight. My wife liked it and I thought it was better than I expected.

 

[MoonOwl]

StickBoy took PBBB to see it this afternoon. He's a good big brother...

She loved it.

 

[Jessica]

It was better than twilight. My wife liked it and I thought it was better than I expected.

I think it probably is. I like Jacob better than Edward...........

 

[GuesSAngel]

my friend heather saw it and she said, just like the first movie, after reading the book...the movie sucked.

 

[Jessica]

So she likes the books better? I agree. even if I didnt watch it, the books are probably better But I havent watched it so I really cant say if it IS better or not

 

[JanieDough]

of course everyone will always like the movies better!

 

[Jessica]

well I like the Harry Potter books better than the movies. I think it depends. Sometimes the movies are better, sometimes the books are.

 

[Goat Whisperer]

I watched twilight, and even though I liked the book (not loved, but I thought it was okay) the movie was horrible. So fake.

I heard this one had a new director, and was supposedly better, so I might see it. When it comes out on redbox.

 

[Goat Whisperer]

Books are always better then the movies. Directors often don't understand what should be taken out, because unlike the authors, they aren't fully aware of all the details that needed for forshadowing.

Take for example, Eragon, the worst book to movie in history, now if you had just watched the movie you thought it was okay, but if you actually read the book, you knew it was horrible. One of the biggest mistakes--and one of the main reasons why there can't be a sequal, is that they didn't put in the twins, who in the future kidnap some people and it's at least 1/2 of the second book.

Authors of books should always right the scripts for the movie. Some things need to be taken out to save time, and they know waht things can be. They are also always better at selecting actors and writing dialougue. If a script isn't written by the author, it is never half as good as the book.

 

[SouthOfHeaven]

I watched twilight, and even though I liked the book (not loved, but I thought it was okay) the movie was horrible. So fake.

I heard this one had a new director, and was supposedly better, so I might see it. When it comes out on redbox.

redbox FTW :thumbup

also Goat Whisperer : Authors of books should always right the scripts for the movie. Some things need to be taken out to save time, and they know waht things can be. They are also always better at selecting actors and writing dialougue. If a script isn't written by the author, it is never half as good as the book.

EXACTLY!

 

[Jessica]

Books are always better then the movies. Directors often don't understand what should be taken out, because unlike the authors, they aren't fully aware of all the details that needed for forshadowing.

Take for example, Eragon, the worst book to movie in history, now if you had just watched the movie you thought it was okay, but if you actually read the book, you knew it was horrible. One of the biggest mistakes--and one of the main reasons why there can't be a sequal, is that they didn't put in the twins, who in the future kidnap some people and it's at least 1/2 of the second book.

Authors of books should always right the scripts for the movie. Some things need to be taken out to save time, and they know waht things can be. They are also always better at selecting actors and writing dialougue. If a script isn't written by the author, it is never half as good as the book.

Yeah I watched some of Eragon but I didnt really like it. The books are way better. Books are probably better than movies after all

 

[satinbutterfly]

I took my mom to see it yesterday, and I truly enjoyed it. I even shed a couple tears. And it was way better than the book I think, mainly because I didn't really enjoy the second book but I really did enjoy the movie.

 

[Tyler Durden]

I went yesterday. It was very decent. Very enjoyable, didn't think I was going to like it much.

Leaves it nicely open for the next movie or two whilst telling a good story within itself.

Bella has improved somewhat since the last movie, though I'm still not much of a fan of Edwards "method" acting (pout)

 

[Jessica]

makes me want to watch it even more.......

 

[AUFred]

I can only think of one movie where it was a vast improvement over the book. It was not a wide released movie but was filmed locally named. "Big Fish"

 

[Jessica]

Never heard of that Lol

 

[HottyToddyChick]

I enjoyed it. I think they did better than the first one at not leaving vital information out. I'm pretty sure all the main points were in it. A lot of things were different than in the movie, and that was nice because I wasn't expecting it, like the first time Jake changes.

Bella improved. Edward still sucked. And they changed Rosalie and I don't like the new one. And I didn't like the way they did Edward when he wasn't really there.

 

[JanieDough]

I liked it because the bar was set so low from the first one.

 

[Jessica]

A lot of people seemed to like it more than the first one

 

[SouthOfHeaven]

A lot of people seemed to like it more than the first one

thats cause honestly the first one wasn't all that great..