The secret of the Illuminati and why they are identifiable yet unstoppable.

[Stone]

An interesting search turned up this quote:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2929342&postcount=11

“

Originally Posted by spidergoat I need evidence of a worldwide organized conspiracy that goes by the name of the Illuminati. Should we just take your word for it? Or perhaps the self-created myth of the Illuminati is the true controlling force?

”

There is no evidence of a worldwide organized conspiracy.
There is no conspiracy. What we see is a natural progression and consequence of our monetary system.

Illuminati is a myth to try to explain what is real. Unassociated people doing their individual things that only appear to be planned.

Regards
DL

LOL!

You're one crazy dude, GIA

When your initial claims fail, you seem to fall back on version 2.0 which is totally different in scope.

from the opening post:

Let me beclear. The Illuminati exist because we all allow them to.

Should the Illuminati be stopped?
No. If they ever did disappear, we would invent a newIlluminati.

Why not stop them?
Because society would go to chaos and our socio economicdemographic pyramid would collapse. This collapse would only be for a short time.It would soon resume its natural and uncontrolled shape.

Should the Illuminati be given more power?
Yes. They could stabilize our common and bring a higher longterm profit and wealth for all.

Will we give them more power?
No. People fear what is already there and fear their ownpower to rule and control the economy. We are cowards and fear that we lack thewisdom and thus allow chaos to run our economy.

If you are wise, you will know that you can know who theIlluminati are and you will also know that you are helping them exist.

Are you aware of this?

Bullshit

 

[Greatest I am]

No....'we' all don't.
You're playing the same old fallacy as in the past by arguing absolutes on the basis of a select few.
And I haven't a clue as to what 'rihanna' refers to.
Do you?

No.

If a fallacy then what % of us do not contribute to the above.

Try giving an answer without sounding like you just took a big hit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbIL5454ltQ&feature=player_embedded

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

No.

If a fallacy then what % of us do not contribute to the above.

Try giving an answer without sounding like you just took a big hit.

.............................

Regards
DL

No.

If a fallacy then what % of us do not contribute to the above.

I only need to present one person, one example to destroy any argument that supports an absolute.
Myself is all that's needed.
And I know of others, within my circle of family and friends ( online and in real life)
Like I've posted in the past, you need to study up on logic and critical thinking.

Try giving an answer without sounding like you just took a big hit.

Quit stealing my lines


And your video is a waste of time in our discussion on the War on Drugs since I initially took the position of decriminalization.......plus the FACT that there is no concept of absolute 'freedom' existing/operating in the US......Proof? The mere existence of a legal system with a set of restrictions is that proof.
So, Penn and Teller's video is Bullshit from the opening. Ironic, eh


Don't just try harder, try smarter

 

[Mercury]

Well....there is little need to cooperate in situations that aren't of a crisis level event, to begin with.

Cooperation is a reflection of the polarity within a society, not necessarily the imposition of a crisis......the intensity of polarization of thought on that particular event/concept.
For instance....Bush was able to polarize the public after 911 into agreeing to an invasion into Iraq. It was propaganda that drove general acceptance, not the reality of the crisis itself.
As the years of occupation passed, it became obvious the original intent of the invasion was bogus.
Again, take the banking scandal. This happened by convincing the general public there was no crisis.....and now the polarization in the general population has produced political leaders reflecting such intense opposition that 'compromise' on solutions often seem non existent.

Now this is VERY true as well! Polarization of a society definitely causes drift and negative competition.