The not so Random Thread .. for OffTopic replies to OT threads

[Elle]

^^^ this is called a cease and desist post. After Donnie posted this a bunch of posts that came after it were deleted, one of which being mine. I made this thread shortly there after I got a PM telling me I could re-post it in PW ... then later I saw where Donnie posted this ...



So basically he did the exact same thing as I did .. except I just put it in the General section where it would be seen more readily.



Personally, I think some of you need to stop looking so freaking hard into everything .. with the thought that everyone is out to cause trouble. It's really getting annoying.

Y'all have rules that are next to impossible to abide by (normal conversation doesn't have a "off topic" limit, or do you stop people in mid sentence and tell them to get back on topic?) .. and then when someone trys to find a way to try and abide by those rules .. you think they are "up to something".

Pretty ridiculous IMO


That's exactly what I just said .. in the post you just quoted .. so I'm unclear as to why you quoted my post, unless it was just to re-reiterate my post again? :unsure:

-The use of colored fontz was utilized to create an overall easy to read post.

-The multi quote tool was utilized as well, thus reducing the number of posts need to emphasize the overall point being made.

-The fact that several exellent points were made.

Grade: 10/10 post.

 

[TheOriginalJames]

Sure took you along time to look all those words up on dictionary.com :24:

:clap I'm enjoying your insinuated insult here. You said this thread was for civil conversation, but when someone has a differing opinion you break the entire point of your own thread to throw needless jabs at someone.

Again, :clap

Bravo.

I like the thread idea, but as with Breath, I understand that just like the original post a topic may come from, it may or may not turn into people taking jabs at each other. You may not like the implication of the usual process when emotions take over, but you should know it's true. The post I quoted of yours is living proof.

 

[SRC]

:clap I'm enjoying your insinuated insult here. You said this thread was for civil conversation, but when someone has a differing opinion you break the entire point of your own thread to throw needless jabs at someone.

I guess you were also enjoying all the ones she was "insinuating" (but not so well) towards me too then?

Don't try to act like Breath is little miss innocent just because you like her James. That's pretty low. She started it, so don't try to bow up at me just because I chose to reciprocate.

 

[Cotton]

Lets hug it out!

 

[TheOriginalJames]

I guess you were also enjoying all the ones she was "insinuating" (but not so well) towards me too then?

Don't try to act like Breath is little miss innocent just because you like her James. That's pretty low. She started it, so don't try to bow up at me just because I chose to reciprocate.

She was simply insinuating the truth, dear Jennie. You and I both know that sometimes when things continue on, they continue on getting out of hand.

 

[bong_express]

it sounds like you are looking for an argument in here jennie, so before you ask breath if she is on something, are you sure you are not?

 

[Cotton]

lol at thread backfire.

 

[bong_express]

lol at thread backfire.

:homo:

 

[Elle]

Lets hug it out!

 

[Cotton]

 

[Elle]

LMFAO, I just found that one yesterday.

 

[SRC]

it sounds like you are looking for an argument in here jennie, so before you ask breath if she is on something, are you sure you are not?

no, the people who came in here spouting off their opinions and ASSumptions in a thread that didn't ask for them (would you look at that .. all those OFFTOPIC posts, kinda like the ones I made this thread about) .. and you (since your only reply was to chime in about it) .. are evidently the ones looking for an argument .. all I did was reply to the responses accusing me of making a thread to re-post posts that were removed due to insults.

She was simply insinuating the truth, dear Jennie. You and I both know that sometimes when things continue on, they continue on getting out of hand.

And we both also know that even though it may die in one thread .. it will just sprout right back up in another .. since we just have the same type threads over and over in certain areas.

I wasn't exactly asking anyone's permission when I made the thread .. nor was this thread to discuss what the thread was about like this .. it was to post your deleted posts that HAD BEEN REMOVED DUE TO BEING OFF TOPIC (not once did I mention or imply re-posting posts that were removed by MODs due to them being of an insulting nature).

You can take up for her all you want .. truth is .. she got bent out of shape because I disagreed with her disagreement of my thread (which isn't unusual for her). Like it's ok for her to have a different opinion .. but it's not ok for me to have my own different opinion (in MY thread) in regards to her opinion ... and not just change my opinion and agree with her.

Last time I checked .. it was still ok to agree with the thought of the threads that you yourself post, and be able to voice disagreements with people who try to down your thread intentions due to a misunderstanding/paranoia on their part..

 

[TheOriginalJames]

no, the people who came in here spouting off their opinions and ASSumptions in a thread that didn't ask for them (would you look at that .. all those OFFTOPIC posts, kinda like the ones I made this thread about) ..

So it's not alright to have opinions on a thread itself, and talk about that thread in that thread? I'm confused now, who's making up the rules here?

Thats like stating "I made a thread about apples and oranges, but I only want to discuss the apples, so oranges are offtopic."

I wasn't exactly asking anyone's permission when I made the thread but it's not ok for me to have my own different opinion (in MY thread) in regards to her opinion ... and not just change my opinion and agree with her.

Nobody said you couldn't have your own opinions. I simply stepped in when you started trying to take jabs at anothers' intelligence. That is a clear cut violation of forum rules.

Differing opinions brought up a heated debate which turned into insinuations and rudeness. But, being that this is the internet...

Alls well that ends well, agree?

 

[Breath]

...she got bent out of shape because I disagreed with her disagreement of my thread (which isn't unusual for her)

1. If you thought I was bent out of shape, then why are you continuing to bash me when I haven't posted anything in here in the last 40 hours. I think it's you who's bent out of shape because my observations have been on point.

2. Your last comment in parentheses is slanderous. It's not me who's name is plastered in nearly every thread trying to one-up someone else's knowledge or opinion. I urge you...read my OP in this thread. I was completely courteous and respectful and understanding of your opinion and your thread. Undeniable fact.

 

[SRC]

lol whatever .. you came at me all sideways.. and when I called your bluff .. now I'm supposedly bashing you LOL .. whaaaaaateva sister .. trus tme .. If I really wanted to bash you .. I wouldn't be coy about it .