The Job Defines the Person?

Very narrow minded point of view, you really dont see the bigger picture, do you?

Actually, you got that ass backwards; there are very wide range of human needs. Your instant, "the job doesn't define the person" is the narrow point of view because to some people the job does. As I said before, you may not like that but it doesn't make it less of valid need on the part of that person. Failing to see the big picture falls on you.
 
Actually, you got that ass backwards; there are very wide range of human needs. Your instant, "the job doesn't define the person" is the narrow point of view because to some people the job does. As I said before, you may not like that but it doesn't make it less of valid need on the part of that person. Failing to see the big picture falls on you.

See, this is where your point dosen't add up. To some, it defines them, not to others, so why judge everyone on their job?
 
Yes, you're right, should I now like racists too seeing that I'm being a hypocrite not liking a bunch of people who dont like another bunch of people?:rolleyes:

Strauss is just playing with words. It's meaningless.

Racist is a different issue but you knew that when you posted it.

Playing with words? Yeah, pointing out an error in logic is playing with words.:sarcasm

What you gentlemen fail to grasp is that the question as original posed relates to the person making the judgment. I've never said that I support such a judgment. I, however, understand that because of their "values" and/or "needs" may drive that judgment. To judge them because of their particular need is a perfect example of hypocrisy on both side of the equation To quote a guy whose name escapes me at the moment (I know his name I'm just fucking with you) "judge not lest you be judged".

People considering entering in to a relationship make judgments all the time....is he to fat, to old, smells funny etc......judging based upon the other person's job may just be another criteria.
 
Back
Top