Some good news for a change

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 63
    Replies
  • 747
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Why would I try to find anything wrong in what I have been saying for a while.. Housing for almost a year has been getting better from the collapse and statistics said it would soon see most foreclosed houses mostly all taken back up. Does that mean all of them will be, I gather not because some of those were trashed from what I have been told, but if the majority were than new houses will have to be built..

I can only hope the positive trend ( hence my comment about positive consumer confidence ) will continue to grow.. So thanks for proving me right.. :p

Housing was "getting better" when is was going back down
See prices never really fell...they were sliding back to normal prices.
Sliding back to proper value is getting better...not going up

Lets take a car...if a ford focus started going for 50 k its over priced..when the price comes back down its good.

Lets look at the chart for houseing adjusted after inflation.

united_states.png


as we can see the price does not have alot of variation{after adjusted for inflation} until about the year 2000.
After which the price of housing became hugely inflated.
People were happy to buy as it was a solid investment..as housing was always going up.
Fuck em let em eat it..I hope housing stays deflated rather than inflates back up.
I have been saying for years the housing never dropped but fell to proper levels.
Inflation{housing} was roughly double in 2008.
People seem to be concerned as people "are paying for a house that has lost value"
Truth is rather they though they had picked a good time to buy{if they resold yes}....it was actually a bad time to buy ..for a home owner..but great for building and selling or flipping remodels.
When did they think the price would stop?

Also a house is a huge investment..taking 2 and 3 decades to pay for.
That extra 5 grand a year {going by 2006} this doesnt include interest...lets tack about 4 grand on that.

Now how is the added expense of nine grand a year for 25 years of someones life a good thing?
How is this going to help the economy?
It doesnt.
That 9 grand goes along ways towards other purchases and creating jobs....this equates to a difference of $4.32 an hour with a 40 hour work week difference between paying for the inflated price or normal value.
I am sorry that people over paid for a house...but we should not be trying to raise housing back up.
For the people that bought in those six to eight years..its their problem..the rest shouldn't be paying in the future due to it.
Its like if "I am going to be paying close to double so should everybody else"....makes no sense.
The argument is "my house isnt worth what I am paying for it"
So they want to make their house value go back up?
What difference does it make they will still pay the same?
And everybody else will be paying more for a house.
Its reverse envy.
 

Attachments

  • united_states.jpg
    united_states.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 2
Last edited by a moderator:

Accountable

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Monetizing the debt lowered the deficit ... and decreased the value of the dollar. It didn't put us in a better position, it only provided charts for the parrots to squawk over.
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Not for empty rebuttals. No surprise there. It's a statistic. It assures nothing. But those who want Obama to succeed will see hope. Those who want Obama to fail, will say something like you said...

I never made it about Obama

It is a statistic

and you still don't get that statistics can do whatever you want


for example lets say a business takes a loss in year 2011 but makes a $100 profit in 2012. That means their profits were up over 100% doesn't it?

wow that is some kind of profit eh

do I need to make it any simpler for you?
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Allen, I wish I could be 1/10 as smart as you... Except the deficit numbers are pretty big, and the change is pretty substantial. But you're right, the glass is half empty, f'n Obama. :p
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Allen, I wish I could be 1/10 as smart as you... Except the deficit numbers are pretty big, and the change is pretty substantial. But you're right, the glass is half empty, f'n Obama. :p

I see you still are in denial

In the last page where did I make it anything about Obama?

If anything you are. I guess you believe in smoke and mirrors
 

Stone

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
54
Tokenz
0.00z
I never made it about Obama

It is a statistic

and you still don't get that statistics can do whatever you want


for example lets say a business takes a loss in year 2011 but makes a $100 profit in 2012. That means their profits were up over 100% doesn't it?

wow that is some kind of profit eh

do I need to make it any simpler for you?



I don't think you're going to convince him with logic....:popcorn2:
 

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.36z
Allen, I wish I could be 1/10 as smart as you... Except the deficit numbers are pretty big, and the change is pretty substantial. But you're right, the glass is half empty, f'n Obama. :p

about the equivalent of bailing out the sinking Titanic with an eyedropper


but you keep on believing what you like
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
How much new debt created the last three years
see if you have a chart to make that good news MA
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
I think you need to hold all political parties to the same standard.

I really try....its not a dem rep thing...it has been a constant trend.
I dont automatically scream democrat...I do give then credit where it is deserved.
I will vote for one...if he or she has a good history..{which some do}.
See the thing is with all candidates president, senate etc.
The good guys usually dont make it....Why?
Getting into office is a big game of shooting dirty pool.....As moral convictions prevent them from initiation.
As a result they end up on defense in the game .....kinda hard to win playing defense.

See it works like this.....an actual good guys campaign is to build himself.
The scumbags want to destroy the other guy...via lie and propaganda.
Free exposure for the scumbag.....The good guy has become the scumbag in the deal to the public....and the actual scumbag takes office.

This is why I can not express enough to pay very little attention to what they actually say during campaign...and research their political history
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top