None of that could have been as bad as the Spanish Inquisition.
None of that could have been as bad as the Spanish Inquisition.
125,000 people were investigated by the Spanish Inquisition, between 3,000 to 5,000 were executed over 350 years. Pol Pot killed 1.7 million in 4 years. Do the math....
I had an athiest movement once ......I ate a loaf of wonder bread while on acid ....that was a shitty turd
This thread sounds like it is more about atheists than religion so math is OK....it's honesty that has to be left out. Books written by atheists like Phil Zuckerman are full of lies. The whole New Atheist movement is based on lies. That's why Zuckerman mentions Denmark but pretty much ignores China and North Korea. It doesn't surprise me that there is much ignorance about history given the numerous books written by atheists recently. Rubes buy these books and then parrot the garbage that is written in them.
Sounds like the same movement. Most people involved with the New Atheist movement are full of shit.
In a great many dictatorships where atheism is forced religion is just driven underground, but it's there.Wars are complex and probably difficult to pin on a single cause. Anyway, Zuckerman makes an astute distinction between organic atheism and atheism forced on the people by a tyrant. He said the second form has always caused suffering. But it is a different matter with organic atheism, that is atheism freely chosen by the people. Denmark is proof that societies with a large organic atheist majority can be quite peaceful.
This thread sounds like it is more about atheists than religion so math is OK....it's honesty that has to be left out. Books written by atheists like Phil Zuckerman are full of lies. The whole New Atheist movement is based on lies. That's why Zuckerman mentions Denmark but pretty much ignores China and North Korea. It doesn't surprise me that there is much ignorance about history given the numerous books written by atheists recently. Rubes buy these books and then parrot the garbage that is written in them.
True. Atheists create lies to try and convince themselves they are right. Choosing data that best fits the desired results.
One can argue that the bible itself has been used to create a forced religiosity, and that the parables written have been misconstrued to represent facts. But I am moving offtopic.
I believe that religion/belief is a deeply personal thing. I mistrust anyone that shouts the attributes of any product (religion or snake oil) from the rooftops.
One could argue anything but history shows for fact what happens when atheists control a government. It ain't pretty.
Yea. yea, yea. To every point there is a counter point. You say this atheist fucks animals, I say that Priest fucks little boys. The OP wasn't about that. It was about whether or not people should keep their fucking mouths shut when it comes to their brand of religion, or religion in general. Hence, my comment on my personal thought that MY religion or lack of, is just that. Personal.
The OP is about Society without God and in SOCIETY where you say "Priest fucks little boys" isn't as common as atheists fuck animals AND little boys. The ATHEIST ran group NAMBLA is pushing for legalizing "fucking little boys". Huge difference there. It looks like society is better off with God.
I mistrust anyone that shouts the attributes of any product (religion or snake oil) from the rooftops.
So let me get this straight. It doesn't bother you that in the 20th century atheist regimes were brutally oppressive and slaughtered millions but you have a problem with someone that would want to talk to you about Jesus....Typical atheist hypocrisy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.