Showering with one of the same sex that is homosexual

[mazHur]

Flaws in the Human Genome Project
Compiling the human genome has been touted as one of the greatest achievements in the field of genetic biology, but the people who complied the human genome failed to put any of the elements of the genome into chronological order. Which gene in the genome is expressed first? Which gene is expressed last? We don't know because the human genome doesn't tell us. It's just a long list of genes that were thrown together, without any regard to chronological order. Suppose someone wrote a history book, and threw an assortment of historical facts together without any attempt to put them in chronological order. If someone did that, it would be a completely worthless history book! It would leave you guessing as to when certain historical events took place.


http://www.helium.com/items/1837518-criticism-of-the-methodology-used-to-compile-the-human-genome

 

[cam elle toe]

You cant teach an old dog new tricks....and some animals are smarter than others.....that goes for "humans" too


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcGplGWkuLQ

 

[KimmyCharmeleon]

Flaws in the Human Genome Project
Compiling the human genome has been touted as one of the greatest achievements in the field of genetic biology, but the people who complied the human genome failed to put any of the elements of the genome into chronological order. Which gene in the genome is expressed first? Which gene is expressed last? We don't know because the human genome doesn't tell us. It's just a long list of genes that were thrown together, without any regard to chronological order. Suppose someone wrote a history book, and threw an assortment of historical facts together without any attempt to put them in chronological order. If someone did that, it would be a completely worthless history book! It would leave you guessing as to when certain historical events took place.


http://www.helium.com/items/1837518-criticism-of-the-methodology-used-to-compile-the-human-genome

They haven't discovered these types of things yet. Doesn't mean they aren't researching into it now. If you ask me, genes are expressed simultaneously anywhere around the body, I thought that was a no-brainer.

 

[mazHur]

They haven't discovered these types of things yet. Doesn't mean they aren't researching into it now. If you ask me, genes are expressed simultaneously anywhere around the body, I thought that was a no-brainer.

you're right, these somatic factors are anywhere around the body (somatic)

I am trying to refresh my genome 'counterpart' by skimming over this link
hope you and other interested here will also find it useful
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene-centered_view_of_evolution

 

[BornReady]

Remember Einstein's words: God does not play dice!!

Actually, Einstein was wrong about that. He resisted quantum mechanics as much as he could. But today most scientists consider quantum mechanics the most successful physical theory yet. That's not to bash Einstein. He clearly was a genius ahead of his time. But he wasn't right about everything.

 

[mazHur]

Actually, Einstein was wrong about that. He resisted quantum mechanics as much as he could. But today most scientists consider quantum mechanics to the most successful physical theory yet. That's not to bash Einstein. He clearly was a genius ahead of his time. But he wasn't right about everything.

Einstein was right when he said God doesn't play dice in the hope of discovering more scientific breakthroughs in
future and which did not appeal to his mind in his days. Quantum theory is just one such example_

 

[BornReady]

But when he said that he was talking about quantum theory. Physical law is the only kind of God Einstein believed in.

 

[Francis]

Hummm is this the video making the fuss..

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=hd6U8z6UaG

 

[Alien Allen]

Hummm is this the video making the fuss..

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=hd6U8z6UaG

Yup that is the one that got me to thinking

I think there is a right to privacy and modesty with somebody who is homosexual the same as would be the case if opposite sexes (non couples) were forced to shower together.

One can call that homophobic but for a heterosexual I think one should not be forced into what is in effect coed bathing.

 

[mazHur]

But when he said that he was talking about quantum theory. Physical law is the only kind of God Einstein believed in.

That's correct... Overwhelmed by the accuracy of mathematical outcome
most physicists eventually lose their faith in God. It's just like some who believe in the Mighty dollar
and forget all the rest.

 

[Dana]

I think the greater question in this matter is will showering with a woman make me a lesbian?

 

[TommyTooter]

I think the greater question in this matter is will showering with a woman make me a lesbian?

you wish! :24:

 

[mazHur]

It makes sense - to prevent pregnancies...

 

[brieze]

I like how this thread started with an opinion-based question about sexual orientation and turned into a semi-debate about genetics and Einstein lol =p

 

[Thornless]

I think some people do a good job of that on their own simply by opening their mouth.

 

[Dana]

Debates bring out the not so intelligent side in some folks.

 

[Alien Allen]

I thought you agreed to stay out of this thread Maz??

your input is unwanted and off topic

 

[Francis]

Yup that is the one that got me to thinking

I think there is a right to privacy and modesty with somebody who is homosexual the same as would be the case if opposite sexes (non couples) were forced to shower together.

One can call that homophobic but for a heterosexual I think one should not be forced into what is in effect coed bathing.

At what cost do you make privacy for everyone in all Gyms, Schools and all Public places ?

Who and why should we pay for it because there may be a gay person using it ?

Its not like Homosexuality is new.. It didn't just start a few years ago.. History shows that EVERY region of the world had and has Gays ( Homosexuals ) in their midst. This is nothing new..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality

 

[Alien Allen]

There was concern if the Equal Rights Amendment of the 70's had been passed that they would eliminate mens and ladies bathrooms if I am not mistaken.

Do we now have to have privacy held hostage by costs??

 

[Tim]

Yup that is the one that got me to thinking

I think there is a right to privacy and modesty with somebody who is homosexual the same as would be the case if opposite sexes (non couples) were forced to shower together.

One can call that homophobic but for a heterosexual I think one should not be forced into what is in effect coed bathing.

No, it's not the same. Men and women were not separated into different showers based on sexual preference, it was based on what equipment you had.

There was concern if the Equal Rights Amendment of the 70's had been passed that they would eliminate mens and ladies bathrooms if I am not mistaken.

Do we now have to have privacy held hostage by costs??

So a room full of naked men showering together is more "private" than if one of the men was gay?



Ok, so don't ask don't tell was abolished. Gays are already serving and showering with their straight counterparts. So how will it be any different when they can actually admit they are gay without worrying about getting kicked out? :dunno