but Obama has more experience in this as a junior senator than she does?
but Obama has more experience in this as a junior senator than she does?
Obama been in politics since 1997. He's been an achiever his entire life. It's completely obvious he's a smart person. And you really have no issues with Palin? There is a group of very qualified Republican people who could serve as VP. You don't question why Palin was picked in the slightest?
i absolutely do
you know i hate both parties equally
but i'm a total achiever.
that doesn't make me qualified to be the leader of the 'free' world.
i whole heartedly agree that there are many republicans who are better qualified
erm...ron paul much?
Senator Barack Obama is on the Senate Committees for Foreign Relations; Homeland Security; Veterans Affairs; Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. He's gone on three major trips overseas as part of an official Senate delegation, meeting with U.S. generals, and/or foreign leaders.
He and Senator Lugar travelled to the former Soviet states to inspect the destruction of WMDs; he traveled to Iraq and met with U.S. generals, and also toured Kuwait, Jordan, Israel, Palestinian territories; he visited various African countries, including Kenya (his father's homeland).
Do you know what he has done to help secure "loose nukes" in European countries? You know, the ones that could end up in the hands of terrorists?
Yeah, a hell of a lot more foreign policy experience than Caribou Barbie does.
we'll see what he doesYou conveniently overlooked "he's been in politics since 1997." He strikes me as someone who is talented, knowledgeable, a people person, knows how to solve problems. I think you are over relying on this partisan generated "lack of experience" excuse as an excuse not to vote for him.
I like Ron Paul.
we'll see what he does
i'm not impressed
shady land deals
shady advisors
shady religious leaders
he's as crooked as all the rest and cuz he says the word CHANGE everyone is sniffin his jock
they're all whackedOk, so you say he is as crooked as the rest. What are ya gonna do, vote for one of the other crooked ones?
* shady land deals- he bought some land from a political operative. I read this article and it did not alarm me.
* shady advisors- ?
* shady religious leaders- Now what does Sarah Palin's Minister (The Witch Hunter) have to do with Obama?
You conveniently overlooked "he's been in politics since 1997." He strikes me as someone who is talented, knowledgeable, a people person, knows how to solve problems. I think you are over relying on this partisan generated "lack of experience" excuse as an excuse not to vote for him.
I like Ron Paul.
Does Obama Have Enough Experience?.
Looking at the 19 presidents since 1900, three of the greatest were among those with the fewest years in electoral politics. TEDDY ROOSEVELT had been a governor for two years and vice president for six months; WOODROW WILSON, a governor for just two years; and FRANLLIN ROOSEVELT, a governor for four years. None ever served in Congress.
I don't see McCain being the clone he is envisioned to be. Take away his war stance and he is to the left of Bush. And Bush is to the left of being conservative. With Obama you have a left wing socialist. His belief is that the government can solve anything. Trouble is there is 200+ years of evidence to the opposite.Allen, I have no problem giving Obama a chance. You on the other hand have watched two terms of disastrous Republican leadership from a former Texas governor and you want some more from a guy who has been touting deregulation for all of his political life, with us in the middle of a financial crisis precipitated by lax regulation. It's you're right to bend over and ask for more.
I don't see McCain being the clone he is envisioned to be. Take away his war stance and he is to the left of Bush. And Bush is to the left of being conservative. With Obama you have a left wing socialist. His belief is that the government can solve anything. Trouble is there is 200+ years of evidence to the opposite.
well that is why you are here and not a political adviser. she was not picked to just pick up feminist votes. if that was the case she would not be pro life. she was chosen because she is a right wing conservative and the base of the far right love that kind.Its my opinion the ONLY reason youd EVER pick someone as dumb as her to be the VP is to get the feminist vote. Obama already is going to have a larger majority vote since he is black. I wish people wouldnt be as narrow-minded as voting for people due to sex or race, because HOW CAN YOU LOSE IN A DEBATE TO KAITE COURIC ROFLOOOOL. THATS TERRIBLE
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.