Reagan Killed the Middle Class 30 Years Ago

Users who are viewing this thread

Johnfromokc

Active Member
Messages
3,226
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I use the words that I do when they're appropriate. There are plenty of more convoluted ways of saying "red herring, "ad hominem", or any other... but they're the most appropriate for the given situation, so I use them. Not my fault that you're incapable of dealing with that. :dunno

I'm entertained by it. Please continue.

And I've used ad nauseum around here as well... though I generally go with ad infinitum, which is appropriate with a whole helluva lot of the shit that you spew.

Excellent! Now you're up to 5 over-used words from your usual 3. Your parents must be so proud.

I've provided figures in this thread regarding education costs... not m fault you haven't bothered reading. It's rather pathetic on your part that rather than trying to refute what people say, you go after the way they phrased their statement.

Very good. Do you think your figures are indicative of the entire nation? The thread was about Reagan destroying the middle class. College tuition was only one portion. But I suppose you fancy yourself an expert in tuition and fees for colleges around the nation.

So...what kind of degree are you persuing retro? a DDD? Doctorate of Dipshit Dissertation. :24:

Who do you fancy you are impressing with your overuse of certain words? :p

And what interest rate do you have on your student loans?

I'll address you as Johnnyboy if I feel like it... and there's a huge difference between that and using homosexuality as a pejorative. I don't have latent homosexuality issues (but there you go again, attempting to use homosexuality as an insult)... I just find it incredibly offensive for someone to use homosexuality as an attack. Slurs are just that... slurs, and they're inappropriate regardless. So, don't do it again.

Suit your self my lil' retrotwinkyboy. I gave you the chance to back off. You bastardize my name, and I'll bastardize yours. It's got nothing to do with homosexuality BTW - it's more your effimanate childish tantrums and mannerisms in your postings that make that term come to mind when I see your posts. Look it up in the Urban Dictionary. Might see your picture right next to the definition.

Here ya go - definition #2:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twinky

And nothing whatsoever is wrong with homosexuality retro. Perhaps if you are offended, you should simply embrace your latent desires. It's ok. Really retro, it's cool. A good psychologist can help you with that. Wonder what their PhD tuition cost?

Toodles lil' buddy. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 40
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top