KimmyCharmeleon
Well-Known Member
Lol that person is happy to call themselves immoral? Hey I like honest people lol. I'm not afraid to say I like calling myself stupid sometimes...
Yeah, um, I checked out those links...they are all just opinion. And every rationally thinking debater knows opinion =/= fact.
One of the links actually criticised Michael Moore himself, as in saying 'Why should a 400 pound man advise us on over-consumption?'. Yeeaaaahhh that's a fallacy you know...you can't critique a theory by attacking the person or their appearance or personality. That's so bloody ignorant and an irrational way of thinking. Just thought I would let you know that!
These links are either a blog post, an opinion shit on a news site or they aren't even rationally written. How are they supposed to be valid or sound? Or acceptable?
You can accuse all you want, but your evidence hardly supports it. A quick Google search and a couple of sites ain't gunna solve it for you.
He is an entertainer that lies and distorts to spew his crap
You can take nothing he says seriously with his liberal bias
He is nothing more than another greedy capitalist who whines about others getting rich. He dresses like a slob but has more wealth than one can imagine as a result of his movies. What a hypocrite
More from Fox News at 10pm.
It's just my prejudice and propensity to stereotype talking, but I'm guessing you don't watch Moore's movies with the same critical eye that you read those links with.Yeah, um, I checked out those links...they are all just opinion. And every rationally thinking debater knows opinion =/= fact.
One of the links actually criticised Michael Moore himself, as in saying 'Why should a 400 pound man advise us on over-consumption?'. Yeeaaaahhh that's a fallacy you know...you can't critique a theory by attacking the person or their appearance or personality. That's so bloody ignorant and an irrational way of thinking. Just thought I would let you know that!
These links are either a blog post, an opinion shit on a news site or they aren't even rationally written. How are they supposed to be valid or sound? Or acceptable?
You can accuse all you want, but your evidence hardly supports it. A quick Google search and a couple of sites ain't gunna solve it for you.
Everyone, meaning Allen and me; and "jumping on" meaning:Thanks everyone for jumping on everything I say!
You're being thin-skinned. I suggest you educate yourself before offering an opinion, and expect that even then people will disagree with you.It's just my prejudice and propensity to stereotype talking, but I'm guessing you don't watch Moore's movies with the same critical eye that you read those links with.And Moores bilge is also just opinion
You are mistaken if you think that only blog sites are critical of him.
You still don't get it
It is the same as here when a republican who all his life chastises others for being immoral and then gets caught doing the same. When your main platform is like Moores which is mainly about greed and you make money just like those greedy people you chastise then you are ripe for being a hypocrite.
As to your critical thinking comments I think you need a dose of humility. Because you are basing your views without even having seen his movies. Ergo it appears your views are based on emotion and not critical thinking. Fancy catch phrases may serve you well in class but are pointless in a street fight debate. IJS
Moore is a hard core socialist
Not just a liberal
He despises capitalism yet has no qualms about raking in big bucks for his movies
I'm not a conservative nor a fan of Fox News, and I hate him passionately too
Why? From what you know or what you imagine or what you've been told?
To say that Michael Moore is intellectually dishonest wouldn’t be correct. It’s not intellectual. He’s just plain, flat out dishonest. And hypocritical.
And “Capitalism: A Love Story,” his latest fake-umentary, is more like Hypocrisy: A Love Story. The lovers: Michael Moore and . . . himself.
That’s unless you count actor Wally Shawn, America’s new “economic scholar” . . . and a character actor who played a teacher in “Clueless,” a title more appropriate for this flick. Shawn is suddenly an econ expert “because he’s read and studied politics and economics.” Big Deal. Shawn tells us that the problem with capitalism is
You have one guy who makes ice cream and nobody likes his, so they don’t buy it, and he goes out of business. You have another guy, and everybody likes his ice cream, so he succeeds.
And this is a problem because . . .? Capitalism . . . it’s bad because bad ice cream makers go out of business.
Firstly, prove the statement in bold. He's had lots of accusations thrown at him, few have actually stuck.
Sure, he's a "liberal". If you look at the facts, and more importantly, listen to the people he interviews in his movies, you get a good picture.
He is an entertainer that lies and distorts to spew his crap
You can take nothing he says seriously with his liberal bias
He is nothing more than another greedy capitalist who whines about others getting rich. He dresses like a slob but has more wealth than one can imagine as a result of his movies. What a hypocrite
According to those so beholden to capitalism and the free market; if you're a rich conservative, you're not greedy, you're just someone who has worked hard throughout their life and deserve a share of the spoils of your hard labor.
However, if you're Micheal Moore, someone who is trying to make others aware of the endemic social problems in the United States and further promote the cause of social justice through various methods such as film and books, through which he has made money, then he is just a greedy capitalist.
Funny that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.