Man beats pedophile to death

Users who are viewing this thread

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
is it possible the deceased did nothing wrong? do we know if the guy had a history with the father, seems to me he (the father) could have had a pre-existing reason to want the guy dead, we will never know
 
  • 116
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Alien Allen

Froggy the Prick
Messages
16,633
Reaction score
22
Tokenz
1,206.42z
is it possible the deceased did nothing wrong? do we know if the guy had a history with the father, seems to me he (the father) could have had a pre-existing reason to want the guy dead, we will never know

Only problem is the guy was found with his pants down and he was on top of the girl and the hospital confirmed she had been molested. You are not going to suggest that after the beating the father took down the guys pants and also attacked his own child are you?
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
Only problem is the guy was found with his pants down and he was on top of the girl and the hospital confirmed she had been molested. You are not going to suggest that after the beating the father took down the guys pants and also attacked his own child are you?

No i am not, i had not seen that detail in any of the links. Where did you read that?
 

Joe the meek

Active Member
Messages
3,989
Reaction score
67
Tokenz
0.05z
People tend to forget that there is a difference between a pedophile and a rapist.

If the medial exam on the girl showed penetration, the story holds. If no penetration is shown, some things in the story don't make a lot of sense such as if the hired hand could see the man taking the girl by force, the man taking the girl would also be able to see the other hired hand. Next question would be why the hired hand didn't run to the direct rescue of the girl if he knew she was being taken away force?

Monday morning quarter backing I know, but questions on the story do come to mind.

But, I'm certain they are all professionals in Texas, so no questions need to be asked.
 

Thornless

Or am I?
Messages
17,313
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.00z
Some time ago a man did the same thing AFTER it was reported to him by his own family member.

Turns out the guy who was killed DID NOT molest the fathers daughter.

Don't get me wrong, I understand why the father did what he did, but he still took the law into his own hands, and for better or worse, that has to be WRONG.

If i caught some sick fuck hurting my child... I would kill the SOB in a heart beat.
 

Darrell

Banned per User's Request
Messages
12,926
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
Joe the meek said:
Thank you for letting me know. Hope your kid doesn't tell that someone sexually assaulted them, then you go and kill the person only to find out your kid was lying.

Put your reading glasses on, and take off the cranky pants. ;) :p

She said if she CAUGHT someone hurting her kids.

Kinda hard to make it up if mom catches the sicko in the act, Joe.
 

porterjack

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
10,935
Reaction score
305
Tokenz
0.10z
Put your reading glasses on, and take off the cranky pants. ;) :p

She said if she CAUGHT someone hurting her kids.

Kinda hard to make it up if mom catches the sicko in the act, Joe.

Even then, chances are, i would imagine Thorny would do time for the killing, thereby depriving her kids of a parent for possibly a long period of time
 

Joe the meek

Active Member
Messages
3,989
Reaction score
67
Tokenz
0.05z
Put your reading glasses on, and take off the cranky pants. ;) :p

She said if she CAUGHT someone hurting her kids.

Kinda hard to make it up if mom catches the sicko in the act, Joe.

I said I understood why the man did what he did.

Thorny decided to quote my entire post which also included other information. THAT is what I was commenting on.

No shit sherlock, any parent would say they would kill the person if they caught them intentionally harming their kids. There, NOW the cranky pants on;)

Ultimately, one should not do any kind of killing in anger unless they're using that anger as a suppressant for fear. That's why YOU don't give me enough credit and automatically think I would neutralize a cop if the cop killed my dog on my property.
 

fuel1316

Active Member
Messages
3,082
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.04z
my instinct as a mother is to join in here and say YES! i would beat the shit out of that man with any object i could find and the anger over the idea of someone sexually assaulting my daughters makes me want to believe i could/WOULD beat them to death.

reality is- facing that situation- i dont think i can say how i would react.
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
20.23z
I think the person should be tried to see if that was actually the case, there are so many cases where this was the "excuse" to kill or harm people. Yes, no one can say how they would react if they caught someone harming their child.

If the person was found to be harming the child, the fate of that person who kills the pedo should be left to what the law has laid down. I agree that sometimes the law sucks, but that is sod's law unfortunately
 

Minderella

Active Member
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The Grand Jury looks at all the evidence to see if there is a reason to bring charges--they didn't find enough evidence to lean that way.

Also, I've read that the dad was very upset that he ended up killing the man. They did call 911 and they were trying to save the guy. Again, that could just have been them "covering" up. BUT I do not think this was a purposeful killing, I think it was a total and complete accident, and I think that the Grand Jury came back with the right decision in this case, based on the few little things I've heard about it--and I'm sure they had much more evidence at their disposal than we have.
 

Tuffdisc

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,024
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
20.23z
The Grand Jury looks at all the evidence to see if there is a reason to bring charges--they didn't find enough evidence to lean that way.

Also, I've read that the dad was very upset that he ended up killing the man. They did call 911 and they were trying to save the guy. Again, that could just have been them "covering" up. BUT I do not think this was a purposeful killing, I think it was a total and complete accident, and I think that the Grand Jury came back with the right decision in this case, based on the few little things I've heard about it--and I'm sure they had much more evidence at their disposal than we have.


Fair enough, but there is a lot of people who would keep silent about this, which I think is wrong. Not saying about this in this case, but there are cases where parents have got their children to lie about being abused by other people
 

fuel1316

Active Member
Messages
3,082
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.04z
Fair enough, but there is a lot of people who would keep silent about this, which I think is wrong. Not saying about this in this case, but there are cases where parents have got their children to lie about being abused by other people
yes thats true and ive dealt with such an allegation first hand. its different when a parent WALKS in ON it happening rather than all after the fact which is why this particular case is different. he was in the right to protect his child and i cant even say its a shame things went to far. though i do feel bad that the father feels bad about it
 

Natasha

La entrepierna de fuego
Valued Contributor
Messages
38,353
Reaction score
257
Tokenz
2,964.30z
I'm not dragging out my family business, but I can promise you that there is one sick motherfucker in this world who, if I could get my hands on him, wouldn't hurt another young girl EVER. I hope he's getting bent over every single night in prison and I hope it hurts.
 
80,525Threads
2,194,654Messages
5,014Members
Back
Top