Jesus as God is problematic.

Jesus as God is problematic.

If you believe in the trinity, you would have to explain how in the beginning, Jesus was alive before his mother was even born.
You would also have to contend with the virgin birth.
That concept was around much earlier than Christianity in other religions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr767bZQWFw&feature=fvw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx5EKaY1B8g&feature=related

To believe in it would mean that you would have to breed God, one species, with man, a different species. In modern terms we call this bestiality. Not a good epithet to hang on a God.
It is also problematic to have God use another mans woman. That sound too much like coveting another man’s wife. It also shows a God that needs a human, his own mother in fact, to reproduce himself as Jesus/God.
If Jesus was in the beginning as part of the trinity then we would end up with two Jesus’.
It sounds strange to me that God would also have to use a woman to reproduce himself. That would make his mate his own mother. In modern terms, that is incest.
To think that God would break the rules of bestiality, and incest and create a paradox of living before his mother, would I think, be wrong.
Further, to think that God would have such problems getting man on track that he would have to tweak his perfect creations also shows a God that somehow failed to start us up the right way and we know that this is impossible for God because it would mean that he is incompetent.
We should all believe that God gets things right the first time and every time.
As to the vicarious redemption of Jesus, this was arguably rejected by God as immoral.
Why have you forsaken me, is answered by, it is immoral.

http://www.thenazareneway.com/vicarious_atonement.htm

The last reason I have a problem with Jesus as God is that scripture has him resurrecting and his body living forever in heaven.
This cannot be as he never ate of the tree of life. He then could not be immortal. At least not his human part.
To believe that Jesus is God one also has to buy into the notion that miracles of all kinds are real.
No proof of any miracle exists and I think that if God wanted man to believe in such a thing, he would have left a sample here for us to ponder.

Do you have faith in Jesus?

If so,

Matthew 17:20
And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.
Do your thing. There are about 50,000 children that starve to death yearly. Time for you to show what faith can do.

Do you have faith in Jesus?

Are miracles real?

Regards
DL
 
Jesus as God is problematic.

If you believe in the trinity, you would have to explain how in the beginning, Jesus was alive before his mother was even born.
You would also have to contend with the virgin birth.
That concept was around much earlier than Christianity in other religions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr767bZQWFw&feature=fvw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx5EKaY1B8g&feature=related

To believe in it would mean that you would have to breed God, one species, with man, a different species. In modern terms we call this bestiality. Not a good epithet to hang on a God.
It is also problematic to have God use another mans woman. That sound too much like coveting another man’s wife. It also shows a God that needs a human, his own mother in fact, to reproduce himself as Jesus/God.
If Jesus was in the beginning as part of the trinity then we would end up with two Jesus’.
It sounds strange to me that God would also have to use a woman to reproduce himself. That would make his mate his own mother. In modern terms, that is incest.
To think that God would break the rules of bestiality, and incest and create a paradox of living before his mother, would I think, be wrong.
Further, to think that God would have such problems getting man on track that he would have to tweak his perfect creations also shows a God that somehow failed to start us up the right way and we know that this is impossible for God because it would mean that he is incompetent.
We should all believe that God gets things right the first time and every time.
As to the vicarious redemption of Jesus, this was arguably rejected by God as immoral.
Why have you forsaken me, is answered by, it is immoral.

http://www.thenazareneway.com/vicarious_atonement.htm

The last reason I have a problem with Jesus as God is that scripture has him resurrecting and his body living forever in heaven.
This cannot be as he never ate of the tree of life. He then could not be immortal. At least not his human part.
To believe that Jesus is God one also has to buy into the notion that miracles of all kinds are real.
No proof of any miracle exists and I think that if God wanted man to believe in such a thing, he would have left a sample here for us to ponder.

Do you have faith in Jesus?

If so,

Matthew 17:20
And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.
Do your thing. There are about 50,000 children that starve to death yearly. Time for you to show what faith can do.

Do you have faith in Jesus?

Are miracles real?

Regards
DL

i saw god this morning....

bread_jesus.jpg
 
This thread is probably the stupidest one I've seen yet.

To put it simply, you're trying to apply your logic to a concept based on faith. You're never going to agree with it.

I seriously don't even know where to start with this thread. I'll have to come back to this thread later and make a longer response. Seriously though. Comparing the virgin birth to bestiality? Really? Assuming that God is all powerful, he can make Mary pregnant without intercourse.

Also, why would you assume that Jesus has to eat from the tree of life to be immortal? If he's God, he's immortal regardless.

How would Jesus existing forever mean that there are two Jesus'? If Jesus existed in heaven, came down to earth, and then went back into heaven, he would still be one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is probably the stupidest one I've seen yet.

To put it simply, you're trying to apply your logic to a concept based on faith. You're never going to agree with it.

I seriously don't even know where to start with this thread. I'll have to come back to this thread later and make a longer response. Seriously though. Comparing the virgin birth to bestiality? Really? Assuming that God is all powerful, he can make Mary pregnant without intercourse.

Also, why would you assume that Jesus has to eat from the tree of life to be immortal? If he's God, he's immortal regardless.

How would Jesus existing forever mean that there are two Jesus'? If Jesus existed in heaven, came down to earth, and then went back into heaven, he would still be one.

Would the Jesus that went back up be the same Jesus that came down?

I take that for you faith, cannot or is not subject to logic and facts or intelligent thought?

Rather a poor way to try to understand God.

As to bestiality.
I see God as one species and Mary as another and they produced a chimera. Is this not true?

Regards
DL
 
Would the Jesus that went back up be the same Jesus that came down?

I take that for you faith, cannot or is not subject to logic and facts or intelligent thought?

Rather a poor way to try to understand God.

As to bestiality.
I see God as one species and Mary as another and they produced a chimera. Is this not true?

Regards
DL

Yes, Jesus would be the same Jesus.

If you view God as one species and Mary as another, and then consider the virgin birth bestality, than that is based on your logic. You're thinking of it through a sexual perspective. Rather you should instead view it as a miracle.
 
Yes, Jesus would be the same Jesus.

If you view God as one species and Mary as another, and then consider the virgin birth bestality, than that is based on your logic. You're thinking of it through a sexual perspective. Rather you should instead view it as a miracle.

Then I would have to believe in fantasy.

No thanks. I will leave such beliefs to children.

Oops.

Regards
DL
 

Attachments

  • monty_python-spot-the-looney-fc.jpg
    monty_python-spot-the-looney-fc.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 3
These are always so stretched. I am a Christian, and I am also full aware that there are many, many religions which have/are based on very similar concepts which Christianity also believes in. Such as a great flood or various plagues. This video though...its extremely biased in a lot of different ways, as are most movies of that quality. They are just too over zealous and conceal far too much.
 
These are always so stretched. I am a Christian, and I am also full aware that there are many, many religions which have/are based on very similar concepts which Christianity also believes in. Such as a great flood or various plagues. This video though...its extremely biased in a lot of different ways, as are most movies of that quality. They are just too over zealous and conceal far too much.

So what are you saying.

Belief in fantasy is good or not?

Regards
DL
 
Im saying the video is propagandistic and stretched. I am also agreeing that there are a lot of fundamental similarities in various seperated religions. Religions in China and Christianity in Europe both believed in a massve flood. However, neither of these groups had direct contact with each other, and history suggests they had these beliefs at around the same time. That seems like it is very likely there was a massive flood, but the religious ramifications of such a thing can obviously be questioned still.
 
Umm, I don't know much, but from what I learnt last year and the year before in my religion class is that God already knows who you are before you are born, so obviously he knows Jesus right?
Jesus is an incarnate being - meaning his soul can take form in a physical human body - and that's what happened basically.
I don't see how it's problematic.
 
Back
Top