Silious950
Active Member
I want to know everyones view on this before I voice mine. Here is an article from Wikipedia about the information on Imperialism and the thoughts of some socialists and communists:
Now I posted this on Myspace in my blog to get the same reaction, just think about this and how it applies to the US. Here is a response from one of my friends:
What do you think? :confused
Lenin, in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916), argued that capitalism necessarily induced monopoly capitalism - which he also called "imperialism" - in order to find new business and resources, representing the last and highest stage of capitalism.[3] One year later, Lenin went on to become the ruler of a renamed and re-invigorated Russian Empire. This theory of necessary expansion of capitalism outside the boundaries of nation-states - one of the foundations of Leninism as a whole - was also shared by Rosa Luxemburg (in The Accumulation of Capital: A Contribution to an Economic Explanation of Imperialism[4]) and then by liberal philosopher Hannah Arendt.[5] Since then, however, Lenin's theory has been extended by Marxist scholars to be a synonym of capitalistic international trade and banking.[6]
While Karl Marx never published a theory of imperialism, he referred to colonialism in Das Kapital as an aspect of the prehistory of the capitalist mode of production. In various articles he also analyzed British colonial rule in Ireland and India. Lenin defined imperialism as "the highest stage of capitalism" (the subtitle of his outline), the era in which monopoly finance capital becomes dominant, forcing nations and corporations to compete themselves increasingly for control over resources and markets all over the world.
Marxist theories of imperialism, or related theories such as dependency theory, focus on the economic relations between countries (and within countries, as outlined below), rather than the more formal political and/or military relationships. Imperialism thus consists not necessarily in the direct control of one country by another, but in the economic exploitation of one region by another, or of a group by another. This Marxist usage contrasts with a popular conception of 'imperialism', as directly controlled vast colonial or neocolonail empires.
-Cited Wikipedia
Now I posted this on Myspace in my blog to get the same reaction, just think about this and how it applies to the US. Here is a response from one of my friends:
First of all Karl Marx was a sociologist who felt that capitalism was the source of all evils in the world such as disease, starvation, poverty, death, etc. So by saying that he was completely accurate and sane in these thoughts, you're basically supporting communism/socialism. Sometimes greats aren't completely sane... for example, Freud (the father of psychology) who made everything up. Second of all, wikipedia isn't a real encyclopedia. Its written by average people. I could post something on there if I wanted to.
What do you think? :confused