Iran warns of 11,000 rocket retaliation

Users who are viewing this thread

GraceAbounds

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,998
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
Iran warns of 11,000 rocket retaliation
Warns that 'enemy bases' would be targeted after any possible attack
The Associated Press
Updated: 6:46 a.m. CT Oct 20, 2007


TEHRAN, Iran - Iran is capable of firing 11,000 rockets into enemy bases within the first minute after any possible attack, state-run television quoted a top Revolutionary Guards Corps commander as saying Saturday.
Gen. Mahmoud Chaharbaghi, the missile commander of the Guards, said Iran has identified all enemy positions and was prepared to respond in less than a minute to any possible attack.
"Enemy bases and positions have been identified. ... The Guards ground force will fire 11,000 rockets into identified enemy positions within the first minute of any aggression against the Iranian territory," the television quoted Chaharbaghi as saying.
Chaharbaghi did not specifically identify the bases or the enemy and did not refer to arch foes Israel or the United States by name. But the U.S. has 40,000 troops on various U.S. bases in other Persian Gulf countries and 20,000 in Mideast waters. Another 160,000 U.S. troops are in neighboring Iraq and about 25,000 are in another one of Iran's neighbors, Afghanistan.
Iran's semiofficial Fars news agency also quoted Chaharbaghi as saying that Iran's radar-avoiding rockets cover the entire Persian Gulf and the entire Iran-Iraq border. Both on state-run TV and in Fars, he only used the word rocket, not missile. A rocket is normally an unguided weapon whereas missiles usually have guidance systems.
Chaharbaghi was quoted by Fars as saying that rockets with a range of 250 kilometers 155 miles will be delivered to the Guards ground force soon. He didn't elaborate.
Nuclear tensions
Iran has periodically raised alarms over the possibility of war, particularly when the West brings up talk of sanctions over Tehran's rejection of a U.N. Security Council demand that it halt uranium enrichment.
Tensions are high between Washington and Tehran over U.S. accusations that Iran is secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons and helping Shiite militias in Iraq that target U.S. troops. Iran denies the claims.
Washington has said it is addressing the Iran situation diplomatically, rather than militarily, but U.S. officials also say that all options are open.
Last month, a top Iranian air force general said Iran has drawn up contingency plans to bomb Israel should the Jewish state attack Iran. He made the comments days after French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said that the international community should prepare for the possibility of war in the event Iran obtains atomic weapons, although he later stressed the focus is still on diplomatic pressures.
Iran denounces Bush's WWIII warning
Iran on Thursday denounced a warning by U.S. President George W. Bush that the Iran's nuclear activities could lead to World War III, saying the statement was warlike rhetoric geared at diverting U.S. attention from White House failures in Iraq.
The White House said Bush was simply making "a rhetorical point" when he suggested that if Iran could make nuclear weapons, it could lead to World War III.
Another top Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander warned last month that U.S. bases around Iran would be legitimate targets.
"Today, the United States is within Iran's sight and all around our country, but it doesn't mean we have been encircled. They are encircled themselves and are within our range," Gen. Mohammed Hasan Kousehchi told IRNA in September.
Last month, Iran showed off its military might during a parade that included torpedoes, surveillance drones and what Iran called its new domestically manufactured warplanes.
Iran recently also has upgraded its Shahab-3 missile to range of about 2,000 kilometers (1,250 miles), capable of reaching Israel and carrying a nuclear warhead.
But last month, Adm. William Fallon, the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East, said he believes Iran is not as strong as it portrays itself. "Not militarily, economically or politically," he said.
© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: Iran warns of 11,000 rocket retaliation - Focus on Iran - MSNBC.com
 
  • 89
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

COOL_BREEZE2

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
hmmmm.

I think if they ever reach a point of having nuclear arms they're just fanatical enough to use them too. All hell would break loose.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
They really wouldn't. Not even Iran is that stupid to throw their entire country away because they know Iran would be turned into a piece of glass if they ever launched any nukes.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh yeah? Like how some fanatics wouldn't strap bombs on themselves to blow up themselves and others too?

Do you think if Hitler had nukes he wouldn't have used it either?
There's a differing level of fundamentalism between a suicide bomber and Iran's leader. One is much more fanatical than the other. The two aren't comparable.


Hitler wouldn't have had used nukes if he knew him and his entire empire would have been flattened in minutes.
 

COOL_BREEZE2

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
There's a differing level of fundamentalism between a suicide bomber and Iran's leader. One is much more fanatical than the other. The two aren't comparable.

Yeah? But they're both fanatical aren't they? And who's to say who would be the leader at some later time?


Hitler wouldn't have had used nukes if he knew him and his entire empire would have been flattened in minutes.

Because he was a *cough* logical minded person right? And what if logical minded Hitler thought he could wipe them out first or threw caution to the wind? Nahhh he wouldn't have done that right? Because he was an upstanding normal humanitarian kind of a person.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Yeah? But they're both fanatical aren't they? And who's to say who would be the leader at some later time?




Because he was a *cough* logical minded person right? And what if logical minded Hitler thought he could wipe them out first or threw caution to the wind? Nahhh he wouldn't have done that right? Because he was an upstanding normal humanitarian kind of a person.
Yes, they are both fanatical, but thats where the similarities end. The leader of Iran will not risk obliterating his entire power structure.


He's much more logical minded than your average fundie that will blow himself up. Again, varying degrees of fanaticism here. If he even thought about launching nukes, other western nations with nukes would obliterate him as well. He sees this and knows he can't launch them. They are simply a scare tactic.


We actually supported Hitler all throughout the 30's as a centrist option for Germany.
 
78,874Threads
2,185,388Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top