If You Were A Dictator...

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 70
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Maulds

Accidental Bastard
Messages
10,330
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.01z
Um, thats not just a conservative ideal. Nor is it even under any ownership of any one ideology. Its common sense.

A kid that has a 4.0 got it because they worked hard. A slacker with a 2.0 got it because they are dense. By being "fair" (which isn't even really fair, its actually totally unfair) you are slowing progression down by pandering to the lowest common denominator. That is digression.

Of course its totally not a conservative idea, its asinine at best. But arent you all for taking from the ones who work for it and giving to the ones who dont? Guess its different when it means taking from you.
 

DavyBoy

DH+MM=Good Maths ♥
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I could answer this in two different ways: what I would actually DO if I was dictator, or a simple list of laws I'd like to see.

The former would take ages to think about, so I'll just answer the latter:

Marriage would be the legal domain of any two people who wish to enter into such an arrangement, provided both are of a certain age. Therefore, same sex marriage would be accepted and legally equivalent to heterosexual marriage, and, in some cases, incestuous relationships would also be deemed legal (provided there was no exploitation considered to be involved, and there might also be restrictions on the ability to procreate).

Abortion, in all cases, would be a criminal offence. The morning after pill would no longer be supplied or generally attainable, and penalties for performing an abortion would vary according to the circumstances. Those who performed abortions would be penalised more severely than the women undertaking the procedure, similar to the way drugs are usually dealt with (i.e. dealers being dealt with more severely than users). This would not happen overnight, and there would be a lengthy and comprehensive education campaign to ensure that everyone was aware of these laws before they were enacted.

School education would be funded far more heavily, with an emphasis on Indigenous communities and other disadvantaged areas. There would be stricter rules on how subjects were taught, to ensure that kids actually learnt something (as opposed to today's trends). Home schooling, however, would be completely legalised with a system in place to ensure that the children are actually being taught (e.g., a yearly compulsory test in basic english/maths etc).

Smoking would be banned. Status quo would remain on all other drugs, with stronger restrictions on weed. Dealers would face far heavier penalties than users.

Pornography industries would face tighter restrictions, and would be heavily monitored for concerns of exploitation.

A more progressive tax system would be introduced, whereby those who earn comparatively massive amounts would have to pay significantly more in taxes. This would not, however, occur to the degree that it stifled competition or the desire to rise in the ranks, so to speak. I don't want equality, I want fairness.

Unemployment would be treated pretty much the way it is now, albeit with stronger incentives given to find work.

Laws would be enacted to ensure cars (i.e., those available to the general public) were unable to travel faster than a particular speed (i.e., 120 km/h). I believe such technology has existed for a while, and personally I see no reason for our cars to have the potential to travel at speeds of 180 km/h.

Status quo would be maintained on gun control (that is, Australian status quo - a complete ban, for most practical intents. Hopefully America will follow suit one day).

I would scrap specific laws on racial and religious discrimination, but keep workplace regulations that prevent bullying in general.

I would maintain status quo on immigration when it comes to languages - the ability to speak basic English would be compulsory, or at the very least, programs would be put in place for immigrants to learn English as soon as they entered this country.

On a general level, immigrants from every corner of the globe would be welcomed, but less emphasis would be placed on Australia being a multicultural society, instead immigrants would be encouraged to see themselves as now Australians, and distance themselves from their country of origin.

Religion would be permitted to be practised freely, but it would be illegal for schools to promote it (e.g., through religious education). I would not, however, follow the draconian example of France and elsewhere, where students are not permitted to wear headscarfs or religious paraphernalia to school. Students wearing Jesus t-shirts would be given a good spanking, however (yes, I'm joking).

There would be no 'illegal' political ideologies, and yes, Irving would be allowed to release his stupid book here without fear of being thrown in jail.

Single-sex schools would be strongly encouraged (through financial incentives), or even forced, to integrate.

Hollywood films would not dominate cinemas the way they currently do - instead, screens would be put aside for quality (including foreign-language) cinema, to allow the tastes of the masses to be more cultivated :) hopefully my school education system would also somehow generate a real love for art among its students, as opposed to exploding cars.

Newspapers and news programs would be highly monitored for possible bias, or outright lying.

And, in summation, I would want a country that fulfilled the basic idea that everyone should have the ability to be as happy and personally fulfilled as they possibly can be, without wrecking the happiness of others. All these rules, hopefully, would lead to this conclusion.

So, what does everyone think? Who wants to come and live in Davidland? :D
 

DavyBoy

DH+MM=Good Maths ♥
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh, and just on that abortion thing? Contraception would also be heavily promoted, as would basic sex education in schools. I'm not catholic :D
 

DavyBoy

DH+MM=Good Maths ♥
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh, and just on the smoking thing, existing smokers might be permitted a certain amount of cigarettes, but would be encouraged to quit... much like the way meth is given to heroin users.

Yeah, I wish I could edit too :(
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Like some of it but dont like other stuff, sounds far too much like a Big Brother state for my liking! Think I'll stay in merry old England!:D
 

DavyBoy

DH+MM=Good Maths ♥
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Fair enough Pete. I've read and enjoyed 1984 as well, but I think there does need to be a middle point between total anarchy and totalitarianism. Some restrictions are good for us, and every human society in the world recognizes that. It's why we have laws.

Still, I wouldn't want a dictatorship anyhow, even if I was in charge. As they say - absolute power corrupts absolutely.


Lol, anyhow, thanks for the reply, and I hope if I ever become prime minister I can make Australia a place so nice you'll want to move here :D
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Oh, I agree there should be some middle ground. I just dont see that it's any of the governments business to tell people what drugs they can and cant take ect. I'm an adult, thats my look out, I dont need every part of my own well being controlled. If I hurt someone while doing it, fair enough, punish me for that. I also find it strange that you would clamp down on a relatively harmless drug like cannabis but still have no legislation to cover a much more harmful drug, alcohol.

Oh, I'd be interested to hear further about your views on immigration, namely the concentration camps basically in which immigrants are kept in the desert and what you would plan to do about that.
 

ssl

Banned
Messages
4,095
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
If I were lucky enough to become a dictator, in my country:

I would be shot.
I would be raped.
I would be shot again.
My statues would fall down.
Then I would be hung.

No, just kidding; although, the democratic/republic institutions would never allow such an event to occur, I do not mind enjoying the thoughts pertaining to the possibilities.


If I were to be entitled Dictator, I would implement the following:

My title shall be known as The One (lol).. Nah, just joshing ya. I would be referred to as Master Chief (nope, kidding). I would just be called Emperor (James).

There would be a Council of Elders. Their job is justice. They will come from all walks of life; holding office will be of two conditions: Fairness, Elected by their District, and previously held a Representative office.

There would be a Council of Representatives. Their job is law. They will also come from all walks of life; holding office has similar conditions: Fairness, Elected by District, Hold a post-secondary degree from accredited institution, or come up the ranks through District Representatives.

Elections are strictly populace based. Your vote counts. Period.

The government will be responsible for the basic protection of the citizens, the basic infrastructure. Other powers will be assigned as deemed necessary by all three branches. In the event of the Empire being attacked, the immediate domestic front will have suppressed rights; with due time -- the first response attack -- these rights will be reinstated as deemed necessary. There will be no questioning of this policy.

The financial system of the country will not be important, insomuch that the government is paid its taxes. Should there be significant reduction of government income from taxation, the government will seize control of the financial system, until the situation is resolved, and the system will be returned to its state before the takeover.

The taxation will be as follows:
There will be an unquestionable sales tax of 10% of any item, whether goods or services.
The districts will apply a sales tax as necessary to meet reasonable budget requirements, not to exceed 5%.
These two taxes will be necessary. If there is a project, such a trans-empirical underground highway system, the funds will be allocated from the general account, and if necessary, a proposal from the affected areas for further taxation must be agreed to by at least 75% of the peoples, in such a fashion that after the project is completed, the taxation will not become a burden to the people's income from the project.

Each district will be accountable for the local policies that occur, as well as the enforcement of laws. Should the local enforcement personnel not be able to handle the situation at hand, dispatched to that district will empirical enforcement personnel be such that order will be reestablished, and control will be returned to the local personnel. If the district experiences any type of catastrophe, the district representatives will meet with the Council of Representatives, the Council of Elders, and myself, to determine possible responses. Should any district experience any financial hardships, they will be audited for extraneous expenditures; should any wasteful purchases be discovered, they will be dealt with immediately as determined by me. Expenditures related to population growth or other types of growth, such as natural conservation or commercial development, that exceed the district's budget shall be examined for correctness, and the appropriate adjustments be made, including support from the empire's reserved funds.

After the population has become self-sufficient, educated to where 85% of the citizenry have post-secondary degrees, established in their communities, and overall contentedness is observed, I would abdicate my position, returning the office to a voted in emperor. The new emperor would be subject to a one-year trial period of leaving things as they are, or at least adhering to the statues set up before hand, before using the other 4 years to change anything to their liking.
 

DavyBoy

DH+MM=Good Maths ♥
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Oh, I agree there should be some middle ground. I just dont see that it's any of the governments business to tell people what drugs they can and cant take ect. I'm an adult, thats my look out, I dont need every part of my own well being controlled. If I hurt someone while doing it, fair enough, punish me for that. I also find it strange that you would clamp down on a relatively harmless drug like cannabis but still have no legislation to cover a much more harmful drug, alcohol.

Oh, I'd be interested to hear further about your views on immigration, namely the concentration camps basically in which immigrants are kept in the desert and what you would plan to do about that.
Not sure on those, I believe there may be some need for detention facilities for illegal immigrants, but probably far less draconian than the Howard system.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top