Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
A lion also eats it's own shit and does other rather disgusting things. I hardly think it is the best thing to base your ethics on!
A lion also eats it's own shit and does other rather disgusting things. I hardly think it is the best thing to base your ethics on!
I'm not debating about killing chickens, I'm debating about how they are treated before being killed and how I think it's disgusting to unnecessarily torture them while killing them.
Not really, heres what I do.
"Mind says...We are hungry"
I say "Hmmmm Let's eat"
Mind says "Okay"
That's it. I do not follow it up with, "How do I feel about this"
I eat, that's how I do it.
If your a vegetarian, are you aware that veggies are ripped from thier roots, and shredded for your pleasure?
I'm not a vegetarian.
No, but there is a distinct difference between: "Hey, I'm hungry, I'll go eat something." and "I'm I'm hungry, I'll go out and hunt down an animal and tear it apart while its alive". Humans have the ability to prepare their food in civilized ways, other animals mostly do not.
yes, things involving life is a major part of ethical studies.Killing a chicken is an ethical debate?
If we are so refined how come we are the only species that kills each other for no reason?
How far have we evolved really?
So you don't mind that a animal that can feel pain, and experience terror and lives that everyday, just so you can have a cheap .99 cent burger at McDonalds? No thought goes through your mind that maybe, just maybe it might be a little wrong, ethically, to treat other living things like garbage just for our consumption?
As long as it is done without them being tortured for an extended period of time, and its quick and painless, I have no problem with it.The food that you prepare in a civilized fashion...Was ripped apart by a machine someplace.
No moral high ground please.
yes, things involving life is a major part of ethical studies.
No, we are not the only animal that kills each other for no reason: Watch other apes.
We have evolved far enough to not be douches to living things.
As long as it is done without them being tortured for an extended period of time, and its quick and painless, I have no problem with it.
Technically, the killing of any living thing isn't pretty though...Correct?
Semantics
If you were eating something, and you though it was delicious, but someone told you half way through you eating it that it was dropped on the floor in a pile of feces, would you still not think it was "gross"?I really don't mind. I don't see why people care so much about this. Their sole purpose is to be created into food for humans. They don't suffer for very long before they're put out of their misery. Call me a heartless bastard if you will, but as far as I'm concerned, food is food. If it tastes good, I'll eat it. And I might as well eat it, because nothing you, or anyone else says will change the way these companies make their food.
And I've never understood why people eat something, then they're like "oh wow this is good!" but when someone tells them it's something that would normally be 'gross' to the ordinary person, or tell them that it went through a certain process to be made, they're like "eww keep that shit away from me." It's just dumb.
Mhm, right.If it tasted good, I don't care. Just as long as it doesn't have a disease or something.:cool
Yes, you're correct, I just don't see the point of making it even more painful for no other reason than to save a few pence, to me that is ethically wrong.
Mhm, right.
Well if you use that argument, we would all ignore every issue except one. I'm more concerned about many other issues but that dosen't mean this one should be ignored.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.