Re: RE: I... think... I'm in looove.
good point about the opinion thing... and that is true, it is my opinion...
but here is why:
>if you want more horsepower, the exhaust needs to be free of the previous exhaust...
>to design a better exhaust system, you need better room...
>putting the engine parallel to the front grill would not net the better room...
>so we point the belt-side of the engine forward...
>so that the exhaust only has to move 180 degrees instead of 270...
>if the engine is pointing to the front, then the blower would not need the "blower driveshaft" at all, it would be straight hooked to the belt..
>if the engine is facing foward, the transmission natively would be under the shifter, which would also decrease the amount of materials faulting under hard shifting...
:tard :tard :tard :dunno :dunno
Bossman351 said:sourlemon2k5 said:i see 3 things wrong witht that specific engine compartment and stuff:
>the blower is wasting more hp than it should be... engine compartment designer's fault
>the engine is 4 cylinders...
>the exhaust manifold work is horrible... the exhaust has to take a total of about (rounded off number ) 270 degrees to exit the engine compartment... robs hp there... or something like that
I dont really see anything "wrong" with it. Everything you stated as "wrong" was all matter of opinion. 4 cylider isnt exactly my slice of pie, but thats because I prefer the easy way (V8). Id still drive it tho.
good point about the opinion thing... and that is true, it is my opinion...
but here is why:
>if you want more horsepower, the exhaust needs to be free of the previous exhaust...
>to design a better exhaust system, you need better room...
>putting the engine parallel to the front grill would not net the better room...
>so we point the belt-side of the engine forward...
>so that the exhaust only has to move 180 degrees instead of 270...
>if the engine is pointing to the front, then the blower would not need the "blower driveshaft" at all, it would be straight hooked to the belt..
>if the engine is facing foward, the transmission natively would be under the shifter, which would also decrease the amount of materials faulting under hard shifting...
:tard :tard :tard :dunno :dunno