Harry Potter!! :D

Users who are viewing this thread

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Thanks!
I dont think though the breaking of Potter's wand by Hermione was shown in the movie- I might be wrong as i can't remember :unsure:
I should have re-read the books or re-watched the whole movie series b4 this one- so I'll be able to connect everything eh :p

it was covered in Part 1, after they escaped from Godric's Hollow... Hermione tells Harry that his wand got broken when they were getting away from Nagini. Right before Harry ends up finding the sword and Ron comes back
 
  • 117
    Replies
  • 5K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I just finished rereading the 7th book last night, so here's what I remember. :)

In the book, Harry's "duel" with Voldemort entails Harry doing a lot of talking to prove to Voldemort why he is going to beat him, why he didn't die when Riddle cast the killing curse on him in the forest, and why he can kill him.
This kind of answers both of your questions.
Neville killed the snake before the duel. The reason Harry and Voldemort could never kill each other was because when Voldemort took Harry's blood to remake himself in the graveyard at the end of the fourth book, he put the protective enchantment into his body that was also in Harry. So, despite the fact that the enchantment wore off when Harry came of age, it was actually still protecting him because Voldemort had kind of renewed the enchantment. However, when Voldemort "killed" Harry in the forest, he removed the enchantment from both of them, thus making him vulnerable to death. Having no more horcruxes, and the Elder Wand actually belonging to Harry, when Voldemort cast the killing curse again in their duel, it rebounded, just like it did all those years ago when Harry was a baby, thus killing him.
In my opinion, the way this goes down in the book would have been a much more interesting way to end than the movie...it explains more, I think.

Phew. That was a long answer. :D Hope you got enough infos!



In regards to your Q...
No. He doesn't keep the Elder Wand in the book. He uses it to repair his old wand that got broken by Hermione.

Thanks for the clarification! :)
In the movie I just remember this wand duel with connected steams, Nevil leaps up and kills the snake and then Voldemort dies. I saw nothing rebound. It appears like killing the snake ended the fight at least in the movie.
Maybe I need to see it again.

Good for you, go to another fucking thread then.
Lol... :spank:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
Spoiler

Watched Harry Potty Deathly Hallows Pt2 last night. Saw it in the theater, read the book. Help me remember.

Did Harry reviving have anything to do with the Resurrection Stone? It looked like he dropped it.

Why did Nevil, killing the snake, finish Voldermort? Yes he previously split up his soul into horcruxes, but I thought he was also carrying around a sliver of his soul in his body? Maybe that was not enough...

MV5BMTY2MTk3MDQ1N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzI4NzA2NQ@@._V1._SY317_.jpg
 

retro

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,886
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Spoiler

Watched Harry Potty Deathly Hallows Pt2 last night. Saw it in the theater, read the book. Help me remember.

Did Harry reviving have anything to do with the Resurrection Stone? It looked like he dropped it.

Why did Nevil, killing the snake, finish Voldermort? Yes he previously split up his soul into horcruxes, but I thought he was also carrying around a sliver of his soul in his body? Maybe that was not enough...

MV5BMTY2MTk3MDQ1N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzI4NzA2NQ@@._V1._SY317_.jpg

Ana explained it all earlier in the thread.
 

HK

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,410
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.03z
Resurrection stone had nothing to do with Harry's coming back, that was because he went willing to die.

The final part of Voldemort's soul, aside from the part in himself, was in Nagini - she was a horcrux too. So she had to be killed before Voldemort could die.
 

Minor Axis

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,294
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.02z
I just finished rereading the 7th book last night, so here's what I remember. :)

In the book, Harry's "duel" with Voldemort entails Harry doing a lot of talking to prove to Voldemort why he is going to beat him, why he didn't die when Riddle cast the killing curse on him in the forest, and why he can kill him.
This kind of answers both of your questions.
Neville killed the snake before the duel. The reason Harry and Voldemort could never kill each other was because when Voldemort took Harry's blood to remake himself in the graveyard at the end of the fourth book, he put the protective enchantment into his body that was also in Harry. So, despite the fact that the enchantment wore off when Harry came of age, it was actually still protecting him because Voldemort had kind of renewed the enchantment. However, when Voldemort "killed" Harry in the forest, he removed the enchantment from both of them, thus making him vulnerable to death. Having no more horcruxes, and the Elder Wand actually belonging to Harry, when Voldemort cast the killing curse again in their duel, it rebounded, just like it did all those years ago when Harry was a baby, thus killing him.
In my opinion, the way this goes down in the book would have been a much more interesting way to end than the movie...it explains more, I think.

Phew. That was a long answer. :D Hope you got enough infos!
[/spoiler]

Thanks. I just don't remember seeing any rebound... :) No matter...
 

anathelia

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,119
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Thanks. I just don't remember seeing any rebound... :) No matter...

The movie leaves plenty up in the air, however...

It is assumed that there is one (in the movie) based on the fact that Voldemort was laying on the ground after the scene with Harry and Dumbledore.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top