Greatest I am
Active Member
Grace relies on good information.
Many Christians say that God does not send us to hell and that we CHOOSE to go there on our own. If fully informed, only the insane would reject God.
Given that God wills the very best for us, and given that we ourselves want the very best for ourselves, then it would seem that no one could make a FULLY INFORMED decision against God. And if not FULLY INFORMED, then the free will defense of hell falls down.
For me, this would apply to the above, given that to reject that which is (by the definition of Christians) the very best for us would imply that one is not fully informed.
This argument is developed in many ways in Thomas Talbott's book "The Inescapable Love of God", where he shows how a doctrine of Universalism (all are eventually saved) is compatible with the Biblical teaching as found in the NT, especially the writings of St Paul.
This quote also indicates that it is God’s will that none be lost and I cannot see God letting his will be thwarted by mankind.
Peter 3;9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
That being the case, there is no hell. Right?
No one who is not insane would choose hell. Right?
God does not allow his will to be thwarted. Right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF6I5VSZVqc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZM3FXlLMug
Regards
DL
Many Christians say that God does not send us to hell and that we CHOOSE to go there on our own. If fully informed, only the insane would reject God.
Given that God wills the very best for us, and given that we ourselves want the very best for ourselves, then it would seem that no one could make a FULLY INFORMED decision against God. And if not FULLY INFORMED, then the free will defense of hell falls down.
For me, this would apply to the above, given that to reject that which is (by the definition of Christians) the very best for us would imply that one is not fully informed.
This argument is developed in many ways in Thomas Talbott's book "The Inescapable Love of God", where he shows how a doctrine of Universalism (all are eventually saved) is compatible with the Biblical teaching as found in the NT, especially the writings of St Paul.
This quote also indicates that it is God’s will that none be lost and I cannot see God letting his will be thwarted by mankind.
Peter 3;9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
That being the case, there is no hell. Right?
No one who is not insane would choose hell. Right?
God does not allow his will to be thwarted. Right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF6I5VSZVqc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZM3FXlLMug
Regards
DL