Greatest I am
Active Member
That's your assumption.
Yep. So is the notion that one should not go to a dentist to have a car repaired.
So far, my mechanic wins hands down.
Regards
DL
That's your assumption.
Dunno. It is either all or nothing I guess. If one adopts the Godhead, then one must adopt all that entails, meaning an all knowing God. You can't say, well, he created the universe and world and all living things, but the poor fucker still can't find the g-spot.
This is ignorance in rare form. By this reasoning a human Judge cannot sentence a pedophile simply because he/she doesn't have sex with children.
I'd say the main function of human sexuality is for reproduction of the species. It is how we humans are designed. To say the designer doesn't understand it is ridiculous and to suggest the creator of it doesn't have any right to advise humans on sexualilty is just plain silly. I guess because humans can't lay eggs we shouldn't use eggs as a source of food.
Sounds like an argument for a anything goes mentality that atheists would like to see. Just take a look at Sweden with the highest % of atheists. On April 26, 2001, in an article entitled Swedes have more and more animal sex the Swedish news website Nettavision reported: “ No one knows for sure how many animals that are abused, but a British study from 2001 indicates that every 20th dog or cat that receives treatment at veterinaries, the injuries are not a result of a direct accident, but the animal has been inflicted the injury as a result of a sexual assault.
There you go, but the OP opinion on religion is based on hatred of religion and God
An interesting subject! Is "God" an entity that created us humans with free will only to watch and judge? Which case the idea of "God" being all-knowing would be void since "God" is creating without knowledge of how humans will act. Or, does "God" create humans only for the purpose of life itself? The depths of this subject are very complex but I don't believe that any human will ever truly KNOW what "God" is or what "God's" intentions are.
When Christopher Hitchens was asked if he thought sex with animals was immoral he evaded the question. Just goes to show the type of morality they have.
Let me see. You condemn man's behavior with other species while praying to a God who also crosses the species line by using mankind to reproduce for him.
If man is guilty of bestiality then so is your God and we can add incest to the mix, as Jesus used his own mother to reproduce.
Regards
DL
Nope. God created man so God created Mary. Christopher Hitchens created bullshit and thought it was OK to have sex with animals. Big difference and your mistake to compare man to God. Apples to oranges.
Yet your God did exactly the same in saying that A & E had become like God's.
God says we are all apples and he is just the most immoral apple in the basket.
I do not believe that Hitchens said any such thing.
A link would be nice if you are not lying.
Regards
DL
Hitchens said it just Google it.
Hitchens said it just Google it.
Yah, that was his stance on the subject. I'm pretty sure he felt the same way about pedophelia.
I have read an article on Hitchens' views and it is not a lie. Maybe you don't know how to use Google.
I have done well enough so far for accusations that I make.
I do not make statements like above without being able to back it up.
Lets see if others have the same kouth.
Regards
DL
Give it up and stop crying. Other people here say they have seen the same information.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.