Falklands War

Users who are viewing this thread

  • 75
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Once again, I'd like to show my respect for the British troops who died saving willing British citizens. The rest of them who dont like that can go fuck themselves and learn not to fuck with freedom.:nod:
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
Excellent post.

Many thanks to those who defended our distant territories and peoples, and to those who lost their own life for it.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
You know, if you're American, its is ok to at least recognise and respect these soldiers, even though it had nothing to do with the USA.;)
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
You know, if you're American, its is ok to at least recognise and respect these soldiers, even though it had nothing to do with the USA.;)

I believe we provided intel from satellites. In any event, job well done, you kicked the ass of a third world country! :jk

Seems full circle in a way, as I recall Prince Charles served on one of the ships. Wasn't there a row about he possibly being targeted or at the least the ship? And now his son served in Iraq (I believe) as honorably as his father in the Falklands.

So what you want about the royals.....they got balls.
 

skyblue

KEEP THE FAITH
Messages
27,194
Reaction score
16
Tokenz
0.34z
I believe we provided intel from satellites. In any event, job well done, you kicked the ass of a third world country! :jk

Seems full circle in a way, as I recall Prince Charles served on one of the ships. Wasn't there a row about he possibly being targeted or at the least the ship? And now his son served in Iraq (I believe) as honorably as his father in the Falklands.

So what you want about the royals.....they got balls.


it was prince andrew......and 8'000 british troops and service men beat an entire nations forces.......and argentina is far from 3rd world
 

Zorak

The cake is a metaphor
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.01z
I can't believe they managed to run a complete military offensive from a few ships. It was amazing.
 

Hoffa

New Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
The British military did a outstanding job as expected . They always do .
The Soldiers and Royal Marines esp.
I remember watching the story unfold and thought at the time they would suffer greater loss ---thankfully not.
I do think a painful lesson was , or should have been learned by the British navy however .
The lesson is this - a fleet under air attack is extremely vunerable , even by old aircraft {A-4's } and simple cannon and bomb. High tech anti -shipping missiles like the Exocet are great , but not needed to sink a ship. The Argentine pilots did their job a lot better than expected by some .
I think the lesson would be you can not have too many AA cannon on the deck of a ship !.
When a pilot attacks a ship directly { no stand -off weapon-missile } , is tasked with flying directly over a warship and dropping a bomb or strafing ---there is nothing that causes more fear than a sky full of 20MM rounds .
I believe the ships were under - armed in this respect .
High tech missiles should not replace AA cannon defense , but rather augment it.

The British navy also enjoyed a good deal of luck.
A couple of factors that played to the advantage . One , is the lack of "buddy packs' in Argentine inventory preventing air-refueling and limiting range of their aircraft . Because of lack of fuel /range , the attacking aircraft had to fly a predicable course { point A to point B} to engage shipping . This allowed Harriers to lie in wait with assurance of an intercept . If the Argies would have had those simple pieces of equipment , it would have changed tactic to a reasonable one , reduced losses , and the ships would have suffered even more as result .
Another bit of luck --- a big one . Most of 500 lb bombs that hit shipping , failed to explode . This saved many ships and many lives . This adventure could have turned into a naval disaster with just a few minor changes .

My point is not to be critical of the British effort , just to point out that this success may not be repeated in future - if conducted in the same way. >f
Ships Sunk
HMS Sheffield

HMS Coventry

HMS Ardent

HMS Antelope

RFA Sir Galahad

Atlantic Conveyor

Landing Craft Utility Foxtrot Four

Ships Damaged


HMS Glasgow

HMS Antrim

HMS Brilliant

HMS Broadsword

HMS Alacrity

HMS Arrow

HMS Argonaut

HMS Plymouth

RFA Sir Bedivere

RFA Sir Lancelot

RFA Sir Tristram

RFA Stromness
 

Strauss

Active Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
it was prince andrew......and 8'000 british troops and service men beat an entire nations forces.......and argentina is far from 3rd world

Thank you, couldn't remember which son served.

"Beat an entire nation"? In this case, that would be the equivalent of being the world's tallest midget.
:D;)

3rd World? I agree, judging whether a country is third world or not is a matter of perspective. From the British point of view I can see you believing that Argentina is a formidable foe.
From the US perspective, its a third world toilet, at best.
:24:
:jk ;)
 
78,875Threads
2,185,392Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top