Fair tax ?

[The Man]

Still waiting for those links.

My pm box is now full...if you want the links go get them from one of the other members that I have sent to.

 

[Stone]

I dont support torture moron.
I have stated that very clearly ...you are being dishonest again.

You shouldn't have lied to the forum about not supporting torture, TM
You do.
You could have avoided all of this pain.
Now you are only making it worse for yourself.
Tough shit, slick

 

[The Man]

Psssst..stone









.

.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.








.
Fuck you

 

[Stone]

My pm box is now full...if you want the links go get them from one of the other members that I have sent to.

LOL........Admit it, you have no intention of linking to anything......

 

[Stone]

Psssst..stone
.
Fuck you

http://blog.duchessstrollins.com/2012/09/04/the-teabilly-dictionary/









.

 

[The Man]

You shouldn't have lied to the forum about not supporting torture, TM
You do.
You could have avoided all of this pain.
Now you are only making it worse for yourself.
Tough shit, slick

LOL
You have stated you would torture and have no regard for the law.
I have made it clear I do not support torture

 

[Stone]

LOL
You have stated you would torture and have no regard for the law.
I have made it clear I do not support torture

Still waiting on those links......

 

[Stone]

LOL
You have stated you would torture and have no regard for the law.
I have made it clear I do not support torture

Again...you support legalized torture ( and I did post the links in your chickenhawk thread) and you have admitted to the torture of a home intruder you had already subdued......thus no impending threat.

Of course I have regard for the law.......that's why I argued torture shouldn't be legalized......to prevent the legal abuse of power.
Would I torture a terrorist under the conditions of an immediate threat....I would, knowing I'd be responsible for my actions under the law.
That is what you argued at TSG to be exempt.......responsibility for your actions.

TM.....you simply fail to be honest about the topic.......you have argued in support of legalized torture, I have not.
You have tortured a person that did not threaten you, I have not nor would I.


TM....it's all about how you, TM, present your lie.
Misstatements, context abuse and disingenuous analogies.

 

[Stone]

And I still haven't gotten that list of links you claimed you'd send......

 

[The Man]

Again...you support legalized torture ( and I did post the links in your chickenhawk thread) and you have admitted to the torture of a home intruder you had already subdued......thus no impending threat.

Of course I have regard for the law.......that's why I argued torture shouldn't be legalized......to prevent the legal abuse of power.
Would I torture a terrorist under the conditions of an immediate threat....I would, knowing I'd be responsible for my actions under the law.
That is what you argued at TSG to be exempt.......responsibility for your actions.

TM.....you simply fail to be honest about the topic.......you have argued in support of legalized torture, I have not.
You have tortured a person that did not threaten you, I have not nor would I.


TM....it's all about how you, TM, present your lie.
Misstatements, context abuse and disingenuous analogies.

Again...you support legalized torture

How do I support legalized torture...you keep saying this but never back it up.

and you have admitted to the torture of a home intruder you had already subdued......thus no impending threat

I had an home intruder...there was no torture ..he begged for me to not call the police.

Of course I have regard for the law

Lie
You have stated you would torture if it fell within your own justifications.

that's why I argued torture shouldn't be legalized

Its already illegal .....wow..no wonder you are so confused'

to prevent the legal abuse of power.

What legal abuse..its already illegal.

Would I torture a terrorist under the conditions of an immediate threat....I would, knowing I'd be responsible for my actions under the law

So you would do it anyway...having disregard for the law.
So you are saying you would do it anyway...even if its illegal.

TM.....you simply fail to be honest about the topic.......you have argued in support of legalized torture

My position has been clear..needs to be illegal..you also responded to that post...thus are posting falsely now again.

You have tortured a person that did not threaten you, I have not nor would I.

I have not...but you have stated you would if it met your own justifications

 

[Stone]

How do I support legalized torture...you keep saying this but never back it up.

I had an home intruder...there was no torture ..he begged for me to not call the police.


Lie
You have stated you would torture if it fell within your own justifications.

Its already illegal .....wow..no wonder you are so confused'

What legal abuse..its already illegal.

So you would do it anyway...having disregard for the law.
So you are saying you would do it anyway...even if its illegal.


My position has been clear..needs to be illegal..you also responded to that post...thus are posting falsely now again.


I have not...but you have stated you would if it met your own justifications

Tim has already called you out on that home intruder.....you posted that you abused that poor guy and the next time you'd kill him.

You have stated you would torture if it fell within your own justifications.

I would, the justification being immediate danger.
You argued in support of legalized torture so there would be no legal responsibility associated in case you made a mistake......that was your argument.

Its already illegal .....wow..no wonder you are so confused'

What legal abuse..its already illegal.

You simply are not being honest with the forum......you did argue in support of legalized torture that occurred during the Bush administration.
Why deny it...I linked to it in your chickenhawk thread.....any one that read the thread saw the links and your posts at TSG under the screen names of Brett888 and akaBrett.

I have not...but you have stated you would if it met your own justifications

No.....you did argue for legalized torture and I argued no torture should ever be legal.

TM....this is a prime example of how dishonest you are with this forum and how you use misstatements, context abuse and complete falsehoods in debating.


TM....your position on torture is a done deal.
Denying it now is a contradiction of your beliefs.....it's debating out of convenience of the moment.








And you still haven't provided any links showing you defeating me in a debate at TSG.

 

[Stone]

TM.....looks like your ineptitude at debate has cost you control of your thread's topic.

 

[Stone]

I wonder how many people voted to rate this thread?











.


It is getting a lot more views than expected given the thread starter's bizarre line of reasoning------------> "fuck the middle class".


Hmmm?......"fuck the middle class" and TM's support of legalized torture .....perhaps there's a connection?

 

[Stone]

It's been ~5 hours since you claimed you'd send me links to debates at TSG where you supposedly whooped me in debate, but still no links.


Still searching? .......

 

[The Man]

Sent to those that requested it...you already know where they are

 

[Stone]

Sent to those that requested it...you already know where they are

Sent to those that requested it

Since when did 'links' become singular?

.
You aren't fooling anyone, slick

You've got nothing but a lot of hot air and BULLSHIT....

 

[Stone]

I notice the rating on this dog of a thread has dropped to 3 stars.....











way to go, TM.....

 

[Stone]

What would be a fair tax if it was applied equally to all earners across the board{all tax brackets}
This include corps, capital gains,everything..all earnings.
No property tax ...extra gas tax...tobacco tax ... beer tax...just one tax even across the board for all earners...regardless of how the earnings are obtained or what they are spent on.
The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired
This tax will cover all combined govt spending.

I say 25 percent is fair

 

[Stone]

Dont complicate things please..I asked what a fair tax would be on all earnings....I specified no property tax etc...one tax cover all form of govt...which includes fire trucks schools etc
But you did point out something I should have clarified....The tax occurs at the time of spending.,,not when funds are acquired.
So what do you consider a fair tax....one tax covering all levels of govt.

.

 

[Stone]

Still waiting on that list of links, TM.