But you claim the rich just keep getting richer due to much profits !!!!,,,so therefore we need more competition.
Which reduces prices which gives people more money in their pocket to go but shit which creates more jobs.
Why the fuck can you not understand this ??
You are a moron...opec with limiting production has to do with the abilty to make you pay what they want..not what you you want to pay
The fucking lag is because of the economy.
I said fuck the middle class...I want the poor to not have to struggle...the middle class comes next..they are not my priority...was the context of my post.
No.......I've posted in the past that the wealthy are achieving greater wealth at greater rates through capital gains and the low tax rates on capital gains.But you claim the rich just keep getting richer due to much profits !!!!
Because you are an idiot???Why the fuck can you not understand this ??
No Shit? Sherlock....and you argue to tax consumers more and tax the already successful wealthy class less.The fucking lag is because of the economy.
I just recently pointed out you wanted the poor to be a welfare class......how is that helping them?I want the poor to not have to struggle.
If you want a vibrant economy, you do need a healthy consumer base....and you say.....fuck'em, they aren't your priority.I said fuck the middle class.....they are not my priority.
Indeed.was the context of my post
Stone...do you know why unemployment suddenly went up and led us into the recession if you can not answer that then do not continue any further.
Stoner seems to think that job creation wont help the economy as there is no demand..what a fucking moron
well fuck you stone and the horse you rode in on :mad
A massive recession/depression in 2007 and 2008.
The housing market crashed, banks defaulted, energy prices skyrocketed on speculation further driving home loan defaults and greater banking stress.
As consumer spending declined, businesses and industry had to cut overhead in an attempt to stay profitable, often laying off jobs as production declined.
Your turn....why are you so ignorant?....
We know that..but you did not state why.A massive recession/depression in 2007 and 2008.
you have not explained how this led to high unemployment...you are only describing what happenedThe housing market crashed, banks defaulted, energy prices skyrocketed on speculation further driving home loan defaults and greater banking stress.
Ok so you do understand that part,,,which is good.As consumer spending declined, businesses and industry had to cut overhead in an attempt to stay profitable, often laying off jobs as production declined
We know that..but you did not state why.
you have not explained how this led to high unemployment...you are only describing what happened
Ok so you do understand that part,,,which is good.
But you yet to show why unemployment went up....you dodged the question..which is fine so lets try this stone.
What do we need to do to get people back to work...it really helps if you know how we got here to begin with.
Try again grasshopper...why were many suddenly out of work...we know they had to downsize grasshopper...but that is because people were out of work to begin with.
Try again.
............................
Your turn....why are you so ignorant?....
So stone...you really dont know why we had the rise in unemployment to begin with do you.
So its obvious that you do not see the importance of putting people back to work.
Stone thinks there is no demand people !!!!!
Halt all construction and investments now !!!
Stone complains the rich just keep getting richer...but yet claims to understand supply and demand.
Competition causes lower prices...which means we can buy MORE of them...which as you guessed puts people to work.
Stone says there is no demand...but will not accept the fact much of our stuff is from china.
With incentive to open shop here ...we create jobs...which gives these people money to go buy stuff to create more jobs.
The lower the unemployment pool..the higher the wages...you know supply and demand stone..when applying you have to apply it to all it effects.
The higher the wages..the more purchase power...the more purchase power the more stuff we buy..the more stuff we buy the more jobs we create.
Well. TM......why are you so ignorant?
You seem to know how to spell most of the terms you use, so why don't you use them correctly in these discussions.
Take the term 'demand'. Why did you think it meant 'want' in a demand vs supply scenario rather than 'relative buy strength'?
It is important to understand the difference in contextual use......or was it intentional?
Is this your treatise about why you are so ignorant?
Easy stone...I know exactly what it means....and use it accordingly...when you use it to support an argument while ignoring the other laws of supply an demand...I will use how the fuck I want...dont like it get out of my class.
When you truly understand supply and demand stone and apply it other than to fit your biased argument...then we can have a that textbook argument
TM...do you ever feel alone in this debate forum and wonder why?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.