Drug users and tax payers. Is it time to make the pushers pay for the party?

[Stone]

Then perhaps you should argue for stringent drug controls and argue these people get tax paying jobs rather that argue for support of illegal activities

That's not a solution for users .......( )

 

[The Man]

I wonder if there are forum rules regarding the support of illegal activity.

 

[The Man]

That's not a solution for users .......( )

I suspect he is upset with the lifestyle his dealer has...and wants him taxed...Jealousy comes in all forms

 

[Stone]

I suspect he is upset with the lifestyle his dealer has...and wants him taxed...Jealousy comes in all forms

Wealth envy :

 

[The Man]

Wealth envy :

Indeed

 

[Greatest I am]

Then perhaps you should argue for stringent drug controls and argue these people get tax paying jobs rather that argue for support of illegal activities

I would if the prohibition laws were not a war against our own children. That is an insult to the first principle of morality and completely useless as history has shown.

If you think that adults are justified in hiding their own poor rearing habits by punishing children then keep the prohibition laws in place.

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

I would if the prohibition laws were not a war against our own children. That is an insult to the first principle of morality and completely useless as history has shown.

If you think that adults are justified in hiding their own poor rearing habits by punishing children then keep the prohibition laws in place.

Regards
DL

Sophistry.
Couple of fallacies.

Nothing new or of interest.

 

[The Man]

I would if the prohibition laws were not a war against our own children. That is an insult to the first principle of morality and completely useless as history has shown.

If you think that adults are justified in hiding their own poor rearing habits by punishing children then keep the prohibition laws in place.

Regards
DL

How are prohibition laws a war against children?

 

[Greatest I am]

How are prohibition laws a war against children?

Who suffers more if dad or mom are in jail?
The children.
Our war also insures that there are pushers all over our schools.
Legalization would end much of that and give us the moral right to come down hard on whoever crosses that line.

The governments are insuring a children's market for the pushers and a steady stream of teen and adults who are addicted because they had access at too young an age.

With pot alone, the 50 odd thousands of dead Mexicans in the last few years have a great impact on their children.
They are now without parents.

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

Who suffers more if dad or mom are in jail?
The children.
Our war also insures that there are pushers all over our schools.
Legalization would end much of that and give us the moral right to come down hard on whoever crosses that line.

The governments are insuring a children's market for the pushers and a steady stream of teen and adults who are addicted because they had access at too young an age.

With pot alone, the 50 odd thousands of dead Mexicans in the last few years have a great impact on their children.
They are now without parents.

Regards
DL

Our war also insures that there are pushers all over our schools.
Legalization would end much of that and give us the moral right to come down hard on whoever crosses that line.

There is absolutely no logic to that fantastic contradiction.....none.....zilch.

The governments are insuring a children's market for the pushers and a steady stream of teen and adults who are addicted because they had access at too young an age.

Wild and fantastic claims with no connection to reality.
This is as bizarre as the fundie argument that the world's problems are all the atheist's fault.
No wonder the radical fundie set is so upset with you

With pot alone, the 50 odd thousands of dead Mexicans in the last few years have a great impact on their children.
They are now without parents.

And now you are concerned over the deaths of violent criminals and their children and argue that they wouldn't be criminals if they were allowed to sell addiction to the innocent.

Amazing compassion, Snake :clap

 

[Stone]

How are prohibition laws a war against children?

Hi Man.....

You gotta admit, it is quite interesting how he formulated a reply that made no sense while using terms we could all understand

 

[The Man]

Hi Man.....

You gotta admit, it is quite interesting how he formulated a reply that made no sense while using terms we could all understand

Indeed..and with his logic we should legalize bank robbery as well to keep the robber out of jail so their children wont suffer.

 

[Greatest I am]

There is absolutely no logic to that fantastic contradiction.....none.....zilch.



Wild and fantastic claims with no connection to reality.
This is as bizarre as the fundie argument that the world's problems are all the atheist's fault.
No wonder the radical fundie set is so upset with you



And now you are concerned over the deaths of violent criminals and their children and argue that they wouldn't be criminals if they were allowed to sell addiction to the innocent.

Amazing compassion, Snake :clap

Lies.

Get the quote or be known for lying.

Regards
DL

 

[Greatest I am]

Indeed..and with his logic we should legalize bank robbery as well to keep the robber out of jail so their children wont suffer.

Hmm.
Crimes with victims as opposed to crimes without.

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

Lies.

Get the quote or be known for lying.

Regards
DL

...............

With pot alone, the 50 odd thousands of dead Mexicans in the last few years have a great impact on their children.
They are now without parents.

Regards
DL

Your previous post is the evidence or are you so dense you don't realize what the hell the words and the logic of their assembly mean?


And being called a liar by you, BY YOU, is certainly not a comment taken seriously in a debate setting.
I have no respect for your intellect.
I have only contempt.
And no apology.

 

[Stone]

Hmm.
Crimes with victims as opposed to crimes without.

Regards
DL

See what I mean

 

[Greatest I am]

Your previous post is the evidence or are you so dense you don't realize what the hell the words and the logic of their assembly mean?


And being called a liar by you, BY YOU, is certainly not a comment taken seriously in a debate setting.
I have no respect for your intellect.
I have only contempt.
And no apology.

Thanks for confirming that you lied.

"And now you are concerned over the deaths of violent criminals and their children and argue that they wouldn't be criminals if they were allowed to sell addiction to the innocent."

Regards
DL

 

[Greatest I am]

See what I mean

No.
And as usual, you do not refute.

Go play your foolish games with those who do not see through you B S.

Regards
DL

 

[Stone]

Thanks for confirming that you lied.

"And now you are concerned over the deaths of violent criminals and their children and argue that they wouldn't be criminals if they were allowed to sell addiction to the innocent."

Regards
DL

You obviously have issues with reading comprehension

Those were my words and they correctly identify your position :clap

 

[Stone]

No.
And as usual, you do not refute.

Go play your foolish games with those who do not see through you B S.

Regards
DL

You aren't a moderator.......