Peter Parka
Well-Known Member
Phew, this second round is a tough one for me. Although it's an important subject, it's not one that I find very interesting so am not too knowledgeable about. Giving it my best shot!
Phew, this second round is a tough one for me. Although it's an important subject, it's not one that I find very interesting so am not too knowledgeable about. Giving it my best shot!
Hmm. In the event that someone's argument and debate points are valid enough but a certain part contains a factual error and this 'part with error' is used to form a point - should that be counted against them?
So you're saying we can just make up stuff to support our arguements? I think the facts are crucial to a good debate. Why would you debate something on false merits?I'd say if the other person doesn't pick up on it then maybe no? Since we're not supposed to be judging on whether we agree, it doesn't really matter what the facts are, but more how they present and defend them. I reckon anyway!
Is it me? :ninja I bet it is, I don't know shit about DRM.
So you're saying we can just make up stuff to support our arguements? I think the facts are crucial to a good debate. Why would you debate something on false merits?
I'm thinking I should have picked two entirely different debate topics.
For the record, my brain still isn't up to speed. I'll try to post my response to HK later on tonight. I should have more time then. After last night, I don't expect much to be going on at work today.
I'm thinking I should have picked two entirely different debate topics.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.