Calif. May Release 20,000 Inmates

Users who are viewing this thread

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Calif. May Release 20,000 Inmates - TIME




(SACRAMENTO, Calif.) — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is considering the early release of more than 20,000 low-risk prison inmates from the nation's largest prison system as a way to save money amid a worsening budget crisis, a newspaper reported Thursday.

Only nonviolent offenders would be eligible, and prisoners considered for the program would have less than 20 months left on their terms, The Sacramento Bee reported on its Web site. Sex offenders would not be included.
The governor's office told The Associated Press that Schwarzenegger had not decided to release inmates early and that it was one of many scenarios being considered as the state seeks to cope with a budget deficit estimated at $10 billion to $14 billion over the next two fiscal years.
The governor has not decided what budget proposals he will deliver to the Legislature next month, said Schwarzenegger spokesman Adam Mendelsohn. Schwarzenegger had ordered state agencies to make 10 percent cuts "but has not made final decisions on what those 10 percent cuts will be," he said.
The state is also under federal court pressure to relieve severe overcrowding, which has been blamed for serious problems in the prison system's health care delivery and mental health services.
The proposal reported by the Bee would cut the prison population by 22,159 inmates and save the state $256 million in the fiscal year that begins July 1. Savings could reach $780 million through 2010.
The proposal also calls for eliminating more than 4,000 prison jobs, most of which would involve guards.
An early release of inmates would be a change of heart for Schwarzenegger, a Republican who has steadfastly opposed such a step.
In a radio address in July, he pledged that he would not release any prisoners early, despite severe overcrowding and the threat that federal judges would put limit the inmate population.
As an interim step to relieve prison crowding, Schwarzenegger's administration has contracted with private prisons in other states to take thousands of California prisoners.
David Runnels, undersecretary for operations for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, declined to comment on the budget proposal. Ryan Sherman, a spokesman for the state prison guards union, told the AP that the union had not seen the proposal and would not comment on the report.
 
  • 54
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Good! There's too many people in prison for offenses which wouldn't make them a danger to the general public anyway!
Danger or not, they've been found guilty and should have to serve their full sentence.

I really don't see the harm in it. There's really no sense in keeping the little fish in the fishbowl.
The little fish broke the law. The little fish should stay in the bowl.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Danger or not, they've been found guilty and should have to serve their full sentence.

Even if the law regarding their crime is stupid, the're no danger to the public and keeping them in prison is costing you wasted money in taxes?
 

IntruderLS1

Active Member
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Probably not, just interesting to know exactly what you're laughing at.;)


Oh, is that all....

I'm laughing at your and AEF's consistent readiness to jump to the defense of criminals.

You guys have no idea what these people did to get themselves locked up, but you're ready to set them free because the corrupt system shouldn't bother with them.

It's just funny to me. :)
 

Maulds

Accidental Bastard
Messages
10,330
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.01z
I'm OK with it as long as it is what it says, non-violent offenders with less than 20 months left. Reduced sentences happen all the time, but its different when the inmate earns it and it isnt just given because the states finances are a wreck. But still, being California I'm surprised it isn't twice that many or more.
 

Peter Parka

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,387
Reaction score
3
Tokenz
0.06z
Oh, is that all....

I'm laughing at your and AEF's consistent readiness to jump to the defense of criminals.

You guys have no idea what these people did to get themselves locked up, but you're ready to set them free because the corrupt system shouldn't bother with them.

It's just funny to me. :)

So please tell me the crimes Arnie is suggesting certain criminals are released for seeing you know so much? All I see there are non violent crimes. Would you like to tell me the non violent crimes which are a threat to your safety?
 

dt3

Back By Unpopular Demand
Messages
24,161
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.21z
Even if the law regarding their crime is stupid, the're no danger to the public and keeping them in prison is costing you wasted money in taxes?
Stupid laws are laws too, Peter. If you break it, you should pay the penalty for it.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top