Are humans meant to be monogamous?

Users who are viewing this thread

GraceAbounds

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,998
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
I believe that the animal (or sin for christians) nature does want to spread its seed, but our humanity makes us not only capable of monogamy, but happily monogamous.
Agree'd. It also aids in growing our character as it encourages us to push deeper into relationship with the one we love. It encourages us to nourish our relationship, to engage in commitment, to communicate, and to sacrifice self at times.
 
  • 41
    Replies
  • 791
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

SRC

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Every animal species has a social structure that they base their daily lives on .. and I don't see why humans would need to "spread around" .. we don't live in packs or herds we live in families .. father mother, brother, son, daughter ..

It's been like that forever .. and even in the deepest untouched parts of Africa (like I previously stated) where "man" has not interveened and put "morals" into play .. the societies that have been foiund .. live almost the EXACT same way. They choose a wife/husband and start a family .. the man doesn't just run aroiund poking his dick in everything that will let him, and the women don't encourage it.

Watch Discovery Channel some time when they do documentaries on those people.

I don't see how one can say "humans" are meant to not be monogamous, when it's clear that even when not taught the "morals" that we civilized people operate under .. that they still bascically do (in a round about manner).
 

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I've also seen one on Discovery where the people put great big plate in their bottom lips and bones through their noses. Cool!
 

Elle

Banned
Messages
5,157
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
Every animal species has a social structure that they base their daily lives on .. and I don't see why humans would need to "spread around" .. we don't live in packs or herds we live in families .. father mother, brother, son, daughter ..

It's been like that forever .. and even in the deepest untouched parts of Africa (like I previously stated) where "man" has not interveened and put "morals" into play .. the societies that have been foiund .. live almost the EXACT same way. They choose a wife/husband and start a family .. the man doesn't just run aroiund poking his dick in everything that will let him, and the women don't encourage it.

Watch Discovery Channel some time when they do documentaries on those people.

I don't see how one can say "humans" are meant to not be monogamous, when it's clear that even when not taught the "morals" that we civilized people operate under .. that they still bascically do (in a round about manner).

Males, whatever species, have an instinctual need to mate. It depends on the species, whether they mate with what they consider a true partner. Animals act on instinct, with the exception of some that have shown proof of possessing some feelings of compassion. For example, I know that penguins show sadness and love and what not. Us humans are more logical when it comes to "mating", since we posses a higher, more complex intelligence and compassion. Humans seek touch and meaningful experiences with another. This is natural. This was not invented. We didn't invent love or pleasure. But monogamy is an idealism, not a natural feeling or instinct.
 

satinbutterfly

Miss Piggy
Messages
21,782
Reaction score
48
Tokenz
169.23z
I think some people use that as an excuse. We are not animals ruled by hormones and sunconscious impulses. I believe that the animal (or sin for christians) nature does want to spread its seed, but our humanity makes us not only capable of monogamy, but happily monogamous.


I hope that makes sense

I change my stance... this I agree with. Humans don't live or rely on instinct... we rely on our own judgement of right and wrong.
 

All Else Failed

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,205
Reaction score
1
Tokenz
0.00z
Every animal species has a social structure that they base their daily lives on .. and I don't see why humans would need to "spread around" .. we don't live in packs or herds we live in families .. father mother, brother, son, daughter ..

It's been like that forever .. and even in the deepest untouched parts of Africa (like I previously stated) where "man" has not interveened and put "morals" into play .. the societies that have been foiund .. live almost the EXACT same way. They choose a wife/husband and start a family .. the man doesn't just run aroiund poking his dick in everything that will let him, and the women don't encourage it.

Watch Discovery Channel some time when they do documentaries on those people.

I don't see how one can say "humans" are meant to not be monogamous, when it's clear that even when not taught the "morals" that we civilized people operate under .. that they still bascically do (in a round about manner).
Humans are very much pack animals. Think of when you go out with a bunch of freinds, or when you go to a sport event. Communities are like massive flocks/packs and so on. We're just a more advanced one, humans like to stick together for various reasons.
 

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
And that is the key of monogamy. ;)
It's not instinct.
Puddin, I'm not telling you how to run yo bizznass, but you better keep ellie on a tight rope! :eek

She's ripe for the pickins! She finds a B.B.D. and yo ass is going to be high and DRY!!! :24:
 

COOL_BREEZE2

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
right......look at mans closest relatives in the animal kingdom.....the apes......most live a small groups and have one prime male that does all of the mating with females......hes the strongest so he calls the shots.......wheras it would be hoped that we as a species have evolved since we were like that i dont think we have......only we mate for pleasure and not to reproduce

Good to be King. :D
 

Keight

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,443
Reaction score
26
Tokenz
175.38z
manogamy depends on the person you are with i would say, if you are happy and are satified in every area of your relationship there is no reason to stray
 

GraceAbounds

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,998
Reaction score
2
Tokenz
0.00z
manogamy depends on the person you are with i would say, if you are happy and are satified in every area of your relationship there is no reason to stray

So if a person is not happy in 'every' area of their relationship, do you think it is ok for them to stray?
 

groundpounder

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,933
Reaction score
0
Tokenz
0.00z
I don't think she meant it's OK to stray, just said there would be no reason. Some people stray because they're unhappy with a part or parts of their relationship.

Some people stray for no reason.

It's never OK, but sometimes there's a cause and effect to it.
 
78,875Threads
2,185,391Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top