I think you drink too much.
Dude, that's you drowning or sinking!!
I think you drink too much.
I gave a fair assessment of Saddam ..something you should try.
Early on he was good for advancing Iraq...He soon turned into a barbaric SOB.
Just because he was ok at one time..does not mean he can not change.
Just because we supported him at one time...does not mean we have to support him after the change.
As far as WMD..I already told you there were none...it was his cockiness that led to the invasion...bad move on his part.
He hampered inspections for years.
He had been told or prior occasions that we would invade if he did not comply.
We had moved our navy multiple times in the past due to Saddam.
Bush told him...no more..next time he will be invaded.
As the navy was moving bush gave him a 48 hour notice to leave Iraq..then a 24 hour notice to leave Iraq..and we would not invade.
He wanted to be tough and stayed....and paid with his life later.
The invasion could have waited...but he needed to be taken out ...he was another "hitler" as he had many good ideas, but was a monster who enjoyed killing people.
you don't need intelligence to differentiate between things,,,,mere instinct is quite enough in such matters.....sincerely....besides yourself and your Taliban handler, who thinks you are intelligent enough to know the difference
I was not talking about war...I am talking about genocide on your own people.So many nations also call you as a monstrous nation who enjoys killing people....sure that must be for reason and you can't be bereft of blame.
I was not talking about war...I am talking about genocide on your own people.
Kurds were killed because they were kurds.Kurds were rebels against Iraq....insurgents and you know what a dictator would do to them naturally!
similarly, many countries even today are killing their own people...in Thailand, in China, in Burma and even in Pakistan.,...and those killed are not innocent but INSURGENTS.
Why was America sleeping when Sadam killed the mutineering Kurds>>? Why didn't Bush state that he was invading Iraq not because it had WMD but because Sadam had killed some Kurd rebels in the past??
Tell fairy tales to someone else....people know YOU are after Iraq's oil....and here ends your story!
Kurds were killed because they were kurds.
You are a hypocrite..as you whine about the taliban being bombed...claiming innocent get killed.
Saddam even destroyed an entire town {that was not kurd} after someone took a shot at his car.
The list goes on and on.
The fucker gathered people in the street and tortured them...killed them.
If you support such you are a sick fuck IJS
Idiota, Look how your so called war on terror manifests its proliferations..and you talking about the US invading Pakistan. Are you crazy or simply deranged, you alpha trolling idiot!!
...............................
You are confused.
A war with Pakistan would have been a practical alternative to invading Iraq.
Pak is a terrorist nation whose leadership admitted to prior state sponsored terrorism.
And you, specifically, can not be trusted.
You are confused.
A war with Pakistan would have been a practical alternative to invading Iraq.
Pak is a terrorist nation whose leadership admitted to prior state sponsored terrorism.
And you, specifically, can not be trusted.
you don't need intelligence to differentiate between things,,,,mere instinct is quite enough in such matters.
Animal instinct is about all you have left in your culture, mazHur.
It's been obvious for quite some time you don't function intelligently.
And you lie a lot making it appear that much worse.
Kurds were rebels against Iraq....insurgents and you know what a dictator would do to them naturally!
similarly, many countries even today are killing their own people...in Thailand, in China, in Burma and even in Pakistan.,...and those killed are not innocent but INSURGENTS.
Why was America sleeping when Sadam killed the mutineering Kurds>>? Why didn't Bush state that he was invading Iraq not because it had WMD but because Sadam had killed some Kurd rebels in the past??
Tell fairy tales to someone else....people know YOU are after Iraq's oil....and here ends your story!
That was one of Bush's arguments...often....but emphasis was placed on WMDs because that appeared more threatening to the US public.Why was America sleeping when Sadam killed the mutineering Kurds>>? Why didn't Bush state that he was invading Iraq not because it had WMD but because Sadam had killed some Kurd rebels in the past??
You are confused.Tell fairy tales to someone else....people know YOU are after Iraq's oil....and here ends your story!
As shown in Figure 1, total petroleum and gasoline consumption have edged downward in recent years. For example, gasoline consumption peaked at 9.6 million b/d in the summer of 2007. By September 2012, it was down to just 8.6 million b/d—a decline of 1 million b/d. The trend in distillate fuel oil consumption has been relatively flat. Most low-sulfur diesel fuel is used in trucks for hauling freight and thus diesel sales are sometimes used as a barometer of overall manufacturing activity. Taken together, recent trends represent a remarkable reversal of long-term consumption trends.
why do you try to avoid replying categorically to my questions rather than making a fuss over irrelevant things??? Nobody asked you to be my Judge, SOB!
you genderless zombie !!......................
You appear to be abusing your prescription meds again.
That was one of Bush's arguments...often....but emphasis was placed on WMDs because that appeared more threatening to the US public.
You are confused.
https://www.mapi.net/us-oil-consumption-declines
Currently, the US has no standing army in Iraq and appears to be avoiding doing so.
So go back to your crack pipe and yell at the walls of your shoebox apartment.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.