AMERICA: NO 1 WAR MONGER.....

Users who are viewing this thread

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
American game.jpg

I too would kill a terrorist...if i found him around. You too can kill terrorists but first you must secure your defense rather than go killing bad as well as good people indiscriminately everywhere..But you are too arrogant, you can invade a weaker enemy because you are strong. If a weak nation was strong and wanted to kill terrorists in your country I don't think you will allow that. would you?? No.



Right policy is to think unto others what you think unto yourself. By thinking otherwise you are only acting unfairly and at the same time also putting your friends in trouble..
who knows you will not ditch them when calamity befalls them?
You have already ditched your apples of the eye, the Mujahideen who fought and sacrificed their live for you to drive away Ruskies from Afghanistan...Now because of your abandoning your ex friends after your 'job' was done they have turned their guns against you...and you your drones and band of allied forces. Now you call as Taliban your same ex friends and you and they call each other terrorists.
From the intensity of hatred for you and not any other nation it seems there is something wrong between you and the terrorists...and both of you have driven this world into perpetual fear and panic and I don't think your policy will bear any fruit as it hasn't for the last 12 years of futile warring.

What the fuck is UNO for?? It hasn't proved any better than the dummy League of Nations...no, it is dominated by the present super power and its cronies....
and is not fulfilling its real purpose of formation in bringing peace and harmony between belligerent nations ....America is obviously trying to recolinize the world and this ain't not going to do any good for the world peace.



When it comes to money all have the same religion...this is the crux of YOur War on Terror...
I too would kill a terrorist...if i found him around.
Nice.
So now you would kill a terrorists...but you have stated in other posts that you want them left alone
You have also stated that we couldnt get rid of them fast enough.
That you want Americans to stop the war..but have no objection with pk killing them when you are posting that you want them left alone...Nice.
With all that flip flopping around..you are starting to look like a wounded seal.

You too can kill terrorists but first you must secure your defense rather than go killing bad as well as good people indiscriminately everywhere

Something you should take up with your army as a link you had shown prior shown that your army was killing a lot of innocent by your definition.


But you are too arrogant, you can invade a weaker enemy because you are strong.

Ahhh..so now killing terrorist leaders is arrogant because we are stronger than them.


If a weak nation was strong and wanted to kill terrorists in your country I don't think you will allow that. would you?? No.
Yes as I am not a terrorist supporter.
 
  • 2K
    Replies
  • 19K
    Views
  • 0
    Participant count
    Participants list

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
frinds-money-matters-jpg.7826
frinds money matters.jpg

Supports my position that we do try to have relations with the Middle East.
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
What the fuck is UNO for?? It hasn't proved any better than the dummy League of Nations...no, it is dominated by the present super power and its cronies....
and is not fulfilling its real purpose of formation in bringing peace and harmony between belligerent nations ....America is obviously trying to recolinize the world and this ain't not going to do any good for the world peace.
LOL
Most of the unrest is in the Mideast where we are trying to restore peace

America is obviously trying to recolinize the world and this ain't not going to do any good for the world peace.
Define recolinize.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Nice.
So now you would kill a terrorists...but you have stated in other posts that you want them left alone
You have also stated that we couldnt get rid of them fast enough.
That you want Americans to stop the war..but have no objection with pk killing them when you are posting that you want them left alone...Nice.
With all that flip flopping around..you are starting to look like a wounded seal.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[Unfortunately you lack common sense..there is a diff between a terrorist and a freedom fighter. A terrorist doesn't warrant my sympathy but a freedom fighter is another case. You have occupied Afgh and it is the Afghans who have risen up against you. Whether you call the Mujahideens(crusaders), freedom fighters or terrorists by any name it will hardly matter to a 'rose' which called by any other name still remains a 'rose'.... You trained them, you employed them for your war and when your job was done you ditched them ...breached your promises to them, betrayed them, which fact turned them against you. Now you call them terrorists? Terrorists were those who attacked your country,,,where are they?? They were Arabs and not Afghans. Butt you are chummy with the Arabs which observes the same Sharia which the Afghans want. Lust and greed has made you adopt double standards and hypocrisy depending upon how rich or poor a country is and how much you can or cannot fleece it.
But you invaded Afghanistan to eradicate a complete generation of Afghans and occupied their land. This is the reason they hate you and your allies and none else.
It's you who have made this world too unsafe for others as well.... If you had belief in democracy you would let the Afghans choose their own system of governement. But what you want is to induct a 'puppet govt' of yours there so that the war continues and peace doesn't come to that region...so that you could move on further into the central asian countries and occupy their resources as well. Yours is a game of vested interest....the war will never end as long as you don't keep to your place...]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Something you should take up with your army as a link you had shown prior shown that your army was killing a lot of innocent by your definition.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[firstly you blamed Pakistan army for siding with the terrorists and now you you don't like them operating. the reason Pak army killed too many civilians is that they are NOT droning but bombing via army aircraft...hence any sane person can expect more casualties with such a non precise attack.
I also proves that all your allegations against Pak army were false ...as they are doing the best they could do to fight YOUR War and be prepared to suffer the counter productive results of such stupidity later on ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Ahhh..so now killing terrorist leaders is arrogant because we are stronger than them.

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[If you deny democratic and fundamental rights to the people of a land, oppress them by various means, occupy their land, destroy their children and families and try to impose your own cherry picked system on their heads the a backlash could be expected naturally. If you do so you should also be ready to face the consequences....this is why i say warring is not the solution to a problem...you cannot keep warring against an 'abstract' enemy...'terror' is an abstract word , and war is not the right thing to change an abstract intangible thing...all that has to be done is to change the soul, the ideology and thoughts...which a war cannot do]]]]]]]]]]]]]


Yes as I am not a terrorist supporter.

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[War for freedom is also being fought in Indian occupied Kashmir.....the Indians call the freedom fighters there as 'terrorists'....
The Sikhs also fought for their freedom in India and eventhough their freedom movement was crushed and many people died in the event....how can you call freedom fighter as 'terrorists'' who fight for liberty and rights denied them??
There is insurgency in the Baluchistan province of Pakistan and during that insurgency many seemingly terrorist activities have come to light....we call them terrorists but others call them 'freedom fighters'....what an anomaly?]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Note: the quotes in parenthesis are Mine!Rest of the crap is someone else's!!;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Whats this shit?
Your post is formatted to make it appear as what I posted is what you posted...then wrap it all in quote tags.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
LOL
Most of the unrest is in the Mideast where we are trying to restore peace


Define recolinize.


How funny!! You are acting in the ME at the behest of Saudi Arabia .....and in support of Israel. Don't try to snatch the credit...if you stopped warring who will you sell your arms and ammunition to??

Read history to find our the meaning of 'colonization' ...or google for more info, self help will keep you on your toes!
The establishment or attempt to establish colonies abroad is what is meant be 'recolonization' in the context.
Here is some help for you..

Nice.
So now you would kill a terrorists...but you have stated in other posts that you want them left alone
You have also stated that we couldnt get rid of them fast enough.
That you want Americans to stop the war..but have no objection with pk killing them when you are posting that you want them left alone...Nice.
With all that flip flopping around..you are starting to look like a wounded seal.



Something you should take up with your army as a link you had shown prior shown that your army was killing a lot of innocent by your definition.




Ahhh..so now killing terrorist leaders is arrogant because we are stronger than them.



Yes as I am not a terrorist supporter.

colonization
Popularity

2 ENTRIES FOUND:
  1. colonization
  2. colonisation

col·o·ni·za·tion
noun \ˌkä-lə-nə-ˈzā-shən\
colonizing
col·o·ni·za·tion·ist noun
First Known Use of COLONIZATION
1766
Other Government and Politics Terms
agent provocateur, agitprop, autarky, cabal, egalitarianism,federalism, hegemony, plenipotentiary, popular sovereignty,socialism
Rhymes with COLONIZATION
abbreviation, abomination, acceleration, accentuation,accommodation, accreditation, acculturation, accumulation,actualization, adjudicat...
[+]more

Learn More About COLONIZATION
Spanish Central Translation: "colonization" in Spanish
Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about "colonization"
Browse
Next Word in the Dictionary: colonize
Previous Word in the Dictionary: colonist
All Words Near: colonization
seen-heard-left-quote.gif
Seen & Heard
seen-heard-right-quote.gif

What made you want to look up colonization? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).


View Seen & Heard highlights from around t
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Are you dunce? Cant you understand the sarcasm in the quote?? You should be ashamed to run with the deer and hunt with the hounds!
It was intended as a jab in the ribs....but unfortunately everything you throw, bounces off me like rubber and sticks to you like glue:eek:
Thats what happens when one posts in a dishonest fashion.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Whats this shit?
Your post is formatted to make it appear as what I posted is what you posted...then wrap it all in quote tags.


did you send this?? Why are you inviting me to America??

passport.gif
Your Chance to permanently live in the US50,000 people and their families win the green card lottery every year.
hand.gif
Quick
registration
through the website
Submit your application and our immigration experts will review it to make sure it meets the requirements and is not disqualified.
phone.gif
Assistance in every step of the processOur experienced immigration specialists provide assistance in 12 different languages to ensure that even if English is not your language, you can still submit a correct applicati
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
The establishment or attempt to establish colonies abroad is what is meant be 'recolonization' in the context.
Here is some help for you..
Where...give me some examples in the ME where this applies in regard to the Americans
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Where...give me some examples in the ME where this applies in regard to the Americans


I am not here to teach idiots...search for yerself and come with a point.
You said you are helping ''restore'' peace in the ME. You tell us how??
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
Not a navigation problem at all but an abuse of the editor..why didnt you edit the post when it was brought to your attention?


You unbelieving SOB!! I am not a typist nor a computer geek!
Honestly I told you it was a mistake, a navigational mistake which anyone can figure out from my postings in the past..to you as well as your crony Stony!

Stony clarified and I too have clarified that all but mine is shit!!;)

Send me a female editor to teach me how to post properly!
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
I am not here to teach idiots...search for yerself and come with a point.
You said you are helping ''restore'' peace in the ME. You tell us how??
By killing terrorists leaders of which you object to.

But back to your claim

The establishment or attempt to establish colonies abroad is what is meant be 'recolonization' in the context.
.
Where...give me some examples in the ME where this applies in regard to the Americans.
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
Note: the quotes in parenthesis are Mine!Rest of the crap is someone else's!!;)
Above is all that shows when I hit the reply button...its still incorrect.
I know you know how to use the editor as you have more posts with it correct rather than with this bracket BS.
 

The Man

Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Messages
11,798
Reaction score
623
Tokenz
176.84z
You unbelieving SOB!! I am not a typist nor a computer geek!
Honestly I told you it was a mistake, a navigational mistake which anyone can figure out from my postings in the past..to you as well as your crony Stony!

Stony clarified and I too have clarified that all but mine is shit!!;)

Send me a female editor to teach me how to post properly!
You know how to use the editor Maz..wouldnt it have been easier to just correct the post than type the above bullshit.
I am beginning to wonder if you are actually a woman as you go to great lengths to try to be intentionally difficult.
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
It was intended as a jab in the ribs....but unfortunately everything you throw, bounces off me like rubber and sticks to you like glue:eek:
Thats what happens when one posts in a dishonest fashion.

did you go through this?
America Is Running the World’s Largest Terrorist Operation
Experts on the Left and the Right Agree
By Washington's Blog
Global Research, April 22, 2014
Washington's Blog and Global Research 20 June 2013
Region: USA
Theme: 9/11 & 'War on Terrorism', Intelligence
Chomsky: “Obama Is Running The Biggest Terrorist Operation That Exists”Leading liberal Noam Chomsky said yesterday:

The Obama administration is dedicated to increasing terrorism. In fact, it’s doing it all over the world. Obama is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history: the drone assassination campaigns, which are just part of it [...] All of these operations, they are terror operations.

***

People hate the country that’s just terrorizing them. That’s not a surprise. Just consider the way we react to acts of terror. That’s the way other people react to [American] acts of terror.
Chomsky is right. Experts agrees that indiscriminate drone strikes are war crimes (more here andhere).
The U.S. is not only killing people whose identity it doesn’t even know (more), but it is also killing children. And it is using the justifiably-vilified Al Qaeda tactic of killing people attending funerals of those killed – and targeting people attempting to rescue people who have been injured by – ourprevious strikes.
Chomsky has previously extensively documented U.S. terrorism. As Wikipedia notes:
Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states.
They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy.
In 1991, a book edited by Alexander L. George [the Graham H. Stuart Professor ofPolitical Science Emeritus at Stanford University] also argued that other Western powers sponsored terror in Third World countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its allies were the main supporters of terrorism throughout the world.

Indeed, the U.S. has created death squads in Latin America, Iraq and Syria.

The director of the

National Security
Agency
under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom - noted:


Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.

Odom also said:
By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

(audio here).
The Washington Post reported in 2010:
The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks.
The head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by our CIA and FBI.
Some in the American military have intentionally tried to “out-terrorize the terrorists”.
As Truthout notes:
Both [specialists Ethan McCord and Josh Stieber] say they saw their mission as a plan to “out-terrorize the terrorists,” in order to make the general populace more afraid of the Americans than they were of insurgent groups.

In the interview with [Scott] Horton, Horton pressed Stieber:
“… a fellow veteran of yours from the same battalion has said that you guys had a standard operating procedure, SOP, that said – and I guess this is a reaction to some EFP attacks on y’all’s Humvees and stuff that killed some guys – that from now on if a roadside bomb goes off, IED goes off, everyone who survives the attack get out and fire in all directions at anybody who happens to be nearby … that this was actually an order from above. Is that correct? Can you, you know, verify that?Stieber answered:
“Yeah, it was an order that came from Kauzlarich himself, and it had the philosophy that, you know, as Finkel does describe in the book, that we were under pretty constant threat, and what he leaves out is the response to that threat. But the philosophy was that if each time one of these roadside bombs went off where you don’t know who set it … the way we were told to respond was to open fire on anyone in the area, with the philosophy that that would intimidate them, to be proactive in stopping people from making these bombs …”
Terrorism is defined as:

The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
So McCord and Stieber are correct: this constitutes terrorism by American forces in Iraq.
The U.S. has been directly supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorists and providing them arms, money and logistical support in Syria, Libya, Mali, Bosnia, Chechnya, Iran, and many other countries… both before and after 9/11. And see this.
Torture – which the U.S. has liberally used during the last 10 years – has long been recognized as aform of terrorism.
Wikipedia notes:
Worldwide, 74% of countries that used torture on an administrative basis were U.S. client states, receiving military and other support to retain power.
Some Specific Examples …
The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligenceadmit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.​
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
contd.............chomsky

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).

As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the followingABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World​

News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
Nine months earlier, a false flag attack was discussed in order to justify an invasion of theDominican Republic. Specifically, according to official State Department records, Under Secretary of State Chester Bowles wrote on June 3, 1961:
The Vice President [Lyndon Johnson], [Attorney General] Bob Kennedy, Secretary [of Defense Robert] McNamara, Dick Goodwin [who was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs], [head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff] General Lemnitzer, Wyn Coerr, and Ted Achilles were here. Bob McNamara and Lemnitzer stated that under the terms of the contingency paper, they were required to be prepared to move into the island on short order if required to do so, and this, in their opinion, called for substantially more troops that we had in the area. After some discussion we considered two more aircraft carriers, some destroyers, and 12,000 marines should be moved into a position some one hundred miles off the Dominican Republic shore…

The tone of the meeting was deeply disturbing. Bob Kennedy was clearly looking for an excuse to move in on the island. At one point he suggested, apparently seriously, that we might have to blow up the Consulate to provide the rationale.
His general approach, vigorously supported by Dick Goodwin, was that this was a bad government, that there was a strong chance that it might team up with Castro, and that it should be destroyed–with an excuse if possible, without one if necessary.
Rather to my surprise, Bob McNamara seemed to support this view …
The entire spirit of this meeting was profoundly distressing and worrisome, and I left at 8:00 p.m. with a feeling that this spirit which I had seen demonstrated on this occasion and others at the White House by those so close to the President constitutes a further danger of half-cocked action by people with almost no foreign policy experience, who are interested in action for action’s sake, and the devil take the highmost …​

[At a subsequent meeting], Bob McNamara went along with their general view that our problem was not to prepare against an overt act by the Dominican Republic but rather to find an excuse for going into the country and upsetting it.
Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

As Chris Floyd and many others have noted, this plan has gone live.
United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
And there is substantial additional evidence of hanky panky in Iraq.​
 

mazHur

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,522
Reaction score
66
Tokenz
0.04z
You know how to use the editor Maz..wouldnt it have been easier to just correct the post than type the above bullshit.
I am beginning to wonder if you are actually a woman as you go to great lengths to try to be intentionally difficult.


I told you I don't know how to use the editor...however, I am trying to learn and hope you will ignore my navigational mistakes.

Me, a woman?? Ask Stone he has conducted a thorough research on me..!!
Hmm..and you made my mind swing back to that white woman who was ass fucked by a big black burly dog and you watching the scene and pouring water over his dick to break the tie!! Gosh! What a dirty man you are!!
 
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members
Back
Top