AMERICA: NO 1 WAR MONGER.....
- Thread starter mazHur
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
-
2KReplies
-
19KViews
-
0Participant count
-
Participants list
Obviously you don't intend to be honest with the foru.
As in the past, my new comments are bolded.
mazHur's replies to my original comments are [[[[ ]]]]]]
As in the past, my new comments are bolded.
mazHur's replies to my original comments are [[[[ ]]]]]]
Stone said: ↑
I've asked you about that many times, mazHur.
While you try to teach the western world it is immoral, I find that not only is your home country guilty of heinous crimes against humanity, you also have values that are often deceitful and sometimes sub human.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ Those are crimes and not values of my society...]]]]]]]
You keep repeating your chant buy we know differently and it's is been done on a large scale and for many decades.
My discovery of your thoughts started with your position on evolution. You purposely confused the concepts of evolution of life, abiogenisis, and the Big Bang. You often used non scientific creationist terminology spiced with religious content trying to mirror scientific concepts.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[Science is science and you cannot compare it with humanities ...
or matters of the soul[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
Indeed. and yet you try out your sophistry anyway. You often project science in religious terms.
It puzzled me that you chose dogs to disprove evolution and paralleled an article written by a young earth creationist whose family name coincidentally was the same as yours.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ I did not choose dogs to disapprove evolution or anything..
that was just a mention of an 'animal orgy'',,.................which you insensitive clerk couldn't understand![[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
Bull shit and I called you on it at the time and there was no mention of animal orgies by you in those evolutionary dog conversations.
I was puzzled at first, was it ignorance or intentional misrepresentation. Now I know it was the latter.
[[[[I agree. You were puzzled at first (sic), you are puzzled at last]]]]]
No, I realize what you are doing and why. It's come out of all the hate USA threads you've started and the racism you hold against our nation. Your hate has consumed your logic and civility
Then your moralizations started on how your culture treated women better than women in the US were treated. Researching that found quite the opposite. You began responding with one example after another, one thread after another on the terror created by the US in your part of the world.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[I quoted references about you and your culture from your own people....and all that stuff has already been published in the public domain.
If it were incorrect or fallacious you should have sent them your objections directly rather than whine at this forum...[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
When it came to abusing women and children, statistics did show PK lead the world and it was thrown in your face.
You actually live in an immoral crime infested shit hole with terrorists operating out of it. The stats just don't lie as you claim.
While the US under GW Bush was obviously responsible for the suffering it caused in Iraq, research and recent news reports put your nation in the spotlight as the 'puppet master' running terrorist groups against it's neighbors for political influence and supporting terrorist groups in launching a war with the US which started with 911, the attack on New York. and the Pentagon. All of which you deny.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[nonesense Pak is not that strong, militarily or economically, to 'puppet master' terrorists'',,,,,,,,,,,,,,It's you who have come to Pakistan for help in your so called war on terror...]]]]]
Deny all you want. But that has been your nations role in the last several decades and it became obvious to our general public when bin Laded was captured and killed with in shouting range of your military and immedially set off a fire storm of protest through out your government.
You have claimed there is no racism in Pakistan. And yet I found through research there was.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[I never said all is perfect in Pak....though a Muslim majority country it does suffer from ethnic, sectarian and linguistic prejudices... ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
You claimed there was no racism in PK. And that is not true.
I found your culture brutalizes women and children.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[that/s a wide ball,,foul!! Only criminals do it.
The MAN found PK men brutalize women on a large enough scale to consider your nation the third worst in the world!!!!
I found your culture brutalizes people of different religions.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[Pak doesn't have to brutalize people of diff religions, there are enought sects among Muslims themselves to 'brutalize' each other!!
Occassionally dispute between Muslims and non Muslims takes place over one's 'illegal enrichment'' , land grabbing or some personal vendetta .....again that is a criminal offense and not our culture or religion[[[[[[[[
And yet I found religious minorities were brutalized and discriminated in PK. You are not being honest with the forum!!
I found from research and your thread on Karachi, you live in a crime infested society.
[[[[[[[[[[That's true as I already told you about it........about a dozen people are target killed daily,,,,and street crime is rampant.]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
I point out you live in a shit hole, you take personal offense ()
[[[[[[[[[[[If you think i live in a shithole I may conversely say that you live in a cunthole...which smears your face with materialistic psyche and hatred for others................making you slaves of Law ..chained in rules and regulations.]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
What do you believe?
It's not so much what you believe as who you are.
As a society, 'you', are moral degenerates.
[[[[[[[[lesser degenerates than licentious people like you,,,,who are marring their cuntry's image and reputation.]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
You are merely a bitter old poet that never made the big time.
As far as you personally, from exhibiting racism:
(you did let this slip in a conversation with me)
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[Racist like you ought to apologize to the world at large and bow to Jesus for forgiveness]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
I still don't see an apology from you for your racist statement.
to the claims you think 'a dog ass fucking a white woman' is funny
really puts you in that same classification......a moral degenerate.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[what's wrong with watching a vid wherein a burly dog ass fucks a whitey?
For one, it's a perversion, second, it is sexual abuse , third, your owning/viewing such material promotes further abuse........go ask you wife about it.
She must have agreed to the act and when the dog discharged and there was a tied it were white men who sprinkled cold water on o\poor animal\'s thingie to lessen its spasm...so the moral of this vid is:
The issue is you found it funny to watch a white woman being sexually abused by an animal.......and you are a known racist to this forum.
you posted:
A better question would be.....mazHur, is there anything good in the world, you do believe in?
That I truly do not know because you hide behind a moral facade.
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[i LOVE WOMEN . THEY ARE THE BEAUTY OF THE UNIVERSE..
NO PLEASURE MORE THAN A GOOD SEX WITH A LOVELY LOVING WOMAN!!
(SORRY I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR GAYS...THEY DISGUST ME...AND ANIMLAS ..YOU CAN TAKE THEM ALL,,,NOT MY CUPPA!!)]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
But you are also a sexual deviant and a racist. That contradicts the imagery you just posted
Last edited by a moderator:
Try critical thinking for a change.
If you did, you wouldn't be posting all the 'I find bestiality funny' and racist comments.
I know something you obviously don't.
\\How can I be serious with a clown?? He is sooo amusing!!
If you had thought how the internet works with search engines, your tune would have been a lot different months ago .
Like I said, I know something you obviously don't.
video ,,,the guy looks as frustrated as a rolling stone!!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/peds054yo72t5xy/Look Up.mp4
https://www.dropbox.com/s/peds054yo72t5xy/Look Up.mp4
NYTimes.com
Monday, May 5, 2014 10:30 AM EDT
Supreme Court Allows Opening Prayer at Town Board Meeting
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a town in upstate New York may begin its public meetings with a prayer from a “chaplain of the month.”
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority in the 5-to-4 decision, said “ceremonial prayer is but a recognition that, since this nation was founded and until the present day, many Americans deem that their own existence must be understood by precepts far beyond that authority of government to alter or define.”
Monday, May 5, 2014 10:30 AM EDT
Supreme Court Allows Opening Prayer at Town Board Meeting
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a town in upstate New York may begin its public meetings with a prayer from a “chaplain of the month.”
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority in the 5-to-4 decision, said “ceremonial prayer is but a recognition that, since this nation was founded and until the present day, many Americans deem that their own existence must be understood by precepts far beyond that authority of government to alter or define.”
Seriously?
You don't know that your posts are now starting to come up in Google searches against your name?
WORLD NEWS
05.04.14
Exclusive: CIA Falls Back in Afghanistan
KABUL, Afghanistan—The CIA is dismantling its frontline Afghan counterterrorist forces in south and east Afghanistan, leaving a security vacuum that U.S. commanders fear the Taliban and al Qaeda will fill—and leaving the Pakistan border open to a possible deluge of fighters and weapons.
“The CIA has started to end the contracts of some of those militias who were working for them,” said Aimal Faizi, spokesman for outgoing Afghan President Hamid Karzai, a longtime critic of the CIA’s Afghan operatives. “Some of them were in very important locations, so we deployed our troops there.”
U.S. and Afghan military commanders tell The Daily Beast that Afghan forces are stretched too thin to replace many of those departing CIA paramilitaries. Thousands more CIA-trained operatives are about to get the boot ahead of what already promises to be a bloody summer fighting season. That could mean spectacular attacks against U.S. and Afghan targets just as the White House is weighing its long-term commitment to Afghanistan. And it could give the now-small al Qaeda movement inside the country more freedom to grow and eventually hatch new plots more than a decade after the invasion meant to wipe out the perpetrators of the Sept. 11th attacks.
Senior U.S. officials said the slow dismantling of the CIA’s forces has also alarmed U.S. lawmakers, who had assumed those forces would remain in the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban after U.S. troops withdrew.
But CIA officials told lawmakers this past week that with U.S. troops slowly closing bases across the country, the intelligence agency’s footprint also has to shrink. The CIA doesn’t want to face another high-risk situation like Benghazi, Libya, where militants attacked both the U.S. diplomatic outpost and the CIA base. The U.S. ambassador, one of his staff and two CIA employees were killed in that strike.
The Obama administration had wanted to leave up to 10,000 U.S. troops in the country after the December 2014 withdrawal deadline. But the current Afghan president has refused to sign a long-term security agreement, and the Afghan presidential election seems headed for a runoff, meaning it could be months before a new Afghan president takes charge.
So U.S. forces here are rapidly closing outposts, preparing to withdraw to six “enduring” bases that could remain if a security deal goes through before early fall. While the CIA is not affected by the security agreement, it relies on the U.S. military for protection and logistical support—especially at its far-flung bases in south and east Afghanistan. Just months ago, the talk in administration circles was that these paramilitaries would be significantly expanded in the near future. Now, it appears, the opposite is taking place.
The CIA started recruiting and training these Afghan paramilitary groups only months after the intelligence agency first entered the country in 2001 ahead of invading U.S. troops, according to current and former U.S. and Afghan officials. They described the top-secret force in detail on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. (The CIA declined to comment for this story.)
The elite Afghan teams have built a fearsome reputation for their U.S. special operations-like targeting of terrorist suspects, guided by a handful of CIA paramilitary officers on most missions.
The forces now facing the chopping bloc
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/05/04/exclusive-cia-falls-back-in-afghanistan.html
My conscience is clear and I believe Google's too.
You are a coward and scared of speaking out your heart with honesty.
I am a layman and citizen of a free world!!
I only know as much as you know about it.......certainly they don't let me peeve while transacting,,why should they and why should it matter me?? I am nobody's brother's keeper.
read newspapers, listen to media and your think tanks and you will come to taste the salt.
You have publically supported the terroists in prior posts.
Afg no longer wants our assistance even though they are having problems.
Since you support the taliban in pk ...my question is a question you can give a response to.
If you did not support them then your reply would have been fitting..but the fact that your support terrorists my question is a question you can give a response to.
It is also your ideal chance to present the other side of the arguement which is * let the terrorists do as they wish and leave them alone*
Last edited by a moderator:
78,874Threads
2,185,387Messages
4,959Members