A question on forum etiquette

[Joe the meek]

If someone asks you on a public internet forum if you have "ever fucked a corpse", would you be out of line by responding with "only your mother"?

 

[Accountable]

Out of line? Dunno, but you're being unnecessarily vague.
Do you mean "Only your mother has ever fucked a corpse," or "The only corpse I have ever fucked is your mother"?
You can see how someone would question what you mean. I suggest you write more specifically, so as to avoid confusion.

 

[Joe the meek]

Out of line? Dunno, but you're being unnecessarily vague.
Do you mean "Only your mother has ever fucked a corpse," or "The only corpse I have ever fucked is your mother"?
You can see how someone would question what you mean. I suggest you write more specifically, so as to avoid confusion.

I can honestly say I never looked at it that way.

The latter response to your question

 

[Springsteen]

I guess it's a stronger way of responding to the old "My Mothers in Hospital" with "Yeah I put her there". I think it's only out of line if a person's way of being offended matches that kind of....insult I guess. Like anything else really.

 

[Accountable]

I can honestly say I never looked at it that way.

The latter response to your question

Well then, in that case, I would opine (I love that word) that if the questioner's mother was not actually dead, then you are publicly critiquing her (the mother's) skills of sexual gratification. Talking behind someone's back is bad form, thus out of line.

If, however, the subject mother had in fact ceased to live prior to your declaration, then you are confessing to a crime - assuming that necrophilia is illegal in your area - and confession is good for the soul, and therefore not out of line.

 

[itsmeJonB]

An offensive question deserves an offensive answer

 

[MsPoppy]

I think a person would be out of line if they aren't accused of the act, but just being asked a question. The response doesn't match the question unless the response is true. If it's a flippant question, that response is still kinda off base in my book, as a third party is being dragged in. The mother had nothing to do with the flippant question except for childbearing the person asking it.

 

[porterjack]

If, however, the subject mother had in fact ceased to live prior to your declaration, then you are confessing to a crime - assuming that necrophilia is illegal in your area - and confession is good for the soul, and therefore not out of line.

this is perfect

 

[Natasha]

I think it's funny...but my mother's not dead. :dunno

 

[Springsteen]

Actually it becomes a question then of.....as your Mother isn't dead. How do you respond? Do you just point out that she isn't? And then maybe the insulter is lost for something to say to respond to that. Making you look smart.

 

[The Man]

If someone asks you on a public internet forum if you have "ever fucked a corpse", would you be out of line by responding with "only your mother"?

Or one could just respond with a yes or no sound familiar?
Not responding directly to the question {as it has no relevancy} could lead one to believe one is a corpse fucker.

Just as one can be labeled a chickenhawk for refusing to discuss whether or not they served.

Same logic.

Thus it would be a hypocritical response as well imply one was indeed a corpse fucker.,,,with the same reasoning that applies to being a chicken hawk

I hope this clears this up

 

[Dana]

That's some interesting fetish... But whatever floats your boat :tooth

 

[Joe the meek]

Just as one can be labeled a chickenhawk for refusing to discuss whether or not they served.

Same logic.

No, it's being a chickenshit (not chickenhawk) because you'd answer one question more in depth, but stay away from a simple yes or no answer per another subject that was related:clap

 

[The Man]

No, it's being a chickenshit (not chickenhawk) because you'd answer one question more in depth, but stay away from a simple yes or no answer per another subject that was related:clap

That has been explained before as well Joe ...which was also was none of your bussiness.

See Joe when it comes to me /I decide what is none of your bussiness not you...not trying sound like an ass but there really is no other way to put it ....its nothing personal against you

To further neither has anything to do with the thread of seceeding from the union which is the entire point.

 

[Joe the meek]

Joe when it comes to me /I decide what is none of your bussiness not you...not trying sound like an ass but there really is no other way to put it ....its nothing personal against you

No problem, I'm use to dealing with "men" like you

 

[Alien Allen]

No, it's being a chickenshit (not chickenhawk) because you'd answer one question more in depth, but stay away from a simple yes or no answer per another subject that was related:clap

Why should he have to answer?

You know as well as I that it is a set up

why give a troller more ammo to use ?

 

[Joe the meek]

Why should he have to answer?

You know as well as I that it is a set up

why give a troller more ammo to use ?

No set up.

Answering one question per previous work history and not something else per along the same lines tells me what kind of "man" I'm dealing with. Hey, it's online, I get that, get all types. Hell, I'm even here.

If anything, got a new signature out of the deal.

Uhmm, not sure, who is the troll?

 

[The Man]

You don't know me very well LOL (and yes, if I were a better man, I'd agree with you completely)

John can give you a pretty good idea of how this will play out.

Not playing our very well for John as evidenced in another thread {the general section I might add}

John saying it doesnt prove it....you have been saying this in multiple threads...either back it up or shut the fuck up



Chickenhawk (also chicken hawk and chicken-hawk) is a political term used in the United States to describe a person who strongly supports war or other military action (i.e., a War Hawk), yet who actively avoided military service when of age.

The term indicates that the person in question is hypocritical for personally dodging a draft or otherwise shirking their duty to their country during a time of armed conflict while advocating that others do so. Generally, the implication is that chickenhawks lack the moral character to ask others to support, fight and perhaps die in an armed conflict. Those who avoid military service and continue to oppose armed aggression are not chickenhawks.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickenhawk_(politics)

Now John prove I dodged the draft or avoided duty and support the following "You are pro war always wanting to see our troops sent to kill some other group of people you despise."

Point to the posts of proof that supports your position of saying I am a chicken hawk....{calling someone a draft dodger is pretty serious john}
You wont..so here we are.

And while calling names is against the rules...I am not going to report your post,,not my style.

But since you wont be able to provide...well the forum can just refer to John as the liar.

Do what you do best John.

 

[Joe the meek]

If you noticed, I took the reference to John out, because ultimately, he has no bearing on your lame excuses.

You got trapped in your own repsonse per my question and the weasle is trying to figure out how to get out.

 

[The Man]

If you noticed, I took the reference to John out, because ultimately, he has no bearing on your lame excuses.

You got trapped in your own repsonse per my question and the weasle is trying to figure out how to get out.

It doesnt help your position Joe.
How does "did you are your family work at a coal mine" have anything to do whether or not unions played a role in the cause of Interstate bakeries {Hostess} going broke.

None.
The only reason I responded to that was to pacify you and continue to topic....only because I like you joe..but you are making that difficult.