So he's the biggest dumbass in history according to his critics so naturally he master-minded the greatest act of treachery ever and got off clean as a whistle. Fuck makes sense to me.
There is a conspiracy going on and it's so obvious a lot of people simply overlook it so I will recap it here for all to peruse.That's what I find so hilarious about the AB crowd--on the one hand they claim he's so stupid he can't read, yet he's able to single mastermind attacks on the towers, keep it all secret, then mastermind fake intelligence and convince all the Democrats that Hussein had WMDs when he really didn't (and of course he must of known the truth would be found out) and all he really wanted was to avenge his Daddy and/or steal Iraq's oil (depending on which conspiracy theory you go with).
i understand people dont like Bush, but even he isnt stupid enough to pull that.
he would have been CAUGHT
this pisses me off.
1. IVE heard BILL CLINTON was warned about this SHIT too. - why arent we on his ass? oh cause we dont have proof just like you dont have proof of this shit!
2. people we t crazy bc Bush didnt immediately get up or some shit from the class room. THAT would have ALARMED the children and freaked them out.
i hate all this crap.
i understand people dont like Bush, but even he isnt stupid enough to pull that.
he would have been CAUGHT
But if you mention it the people who think Bush planned it just say they are trying to be sure he is caught and the rest of us are sheep for believing the given explanations.
Winston Churchill, to get USA involved because the UK was losing the war in europe
i still shake my head in disbelief.......now tell us how ireland allowed the nazi's to use the ports on the west coast of ireland as bases for its u-boats
Let us look at some facts:
- Allegedly, the FBI and CIA had warning of imminent attacks on U.S. by Al Qaeda, but were told to "back off" by George W. Bush
- The way the towers fell suggest explosives were planted in the buildings to trigger the collapse. These are the only structures of its kind in the history of the world to have fallen from "fire"
- Tower 7 collapsed, in much the same fashion as the WTC towers, and contained FBI, CIA and NSA files
- Mohammed Atma, the supposed leader of the hijackers, was wired $100,000 on Sept 10th, and his completely undamaged passport was found a distace from the WTC after the attacks
it made sense if you use some logicThe only thing that aroused my suspicion was the way all three towers fell perfectly vertical. This led some to speculate that it was a controlled demolition. But as one expert said, it takes dozens of people days to properly prep a building for demolition. all the chords and prep mess could not be hidden in a building that is in constant use.
it made sense if you use some logic
no way a demo could be done without one massive conspiracy
there was a ton of jet fuel displaced
when the first of the floors collapsed it set off a chain reaction which the weakened structure could never withstand
I'm not an engineer so I can't dispute that. But. equally, are you?
Really? Do you need to be an engineer to understand gravity and weight? Its common sense. When you have a 10 ton floor fall on another 10 ton floor, of which these floors aren't designed to withstand that kind of pressure, do you really think it wouldn't cause a chain reaction? Steel is strong, but it's not strong enough to withstand hundreds of tons of metal, glass, wood, paper, people and other shit falling on it.
Go find videos of demo'd buildings. None of them have ever fallen straight down onto their footprint like that. Most of the time they come down lopsided, one side goes down before the other. Then the center of the building is exploded.
Explosions need to be placed in key areas on the ground floor or below.
And if a conspiracy theory has no rock-solid, indisputable proof, it's also less than worthless.Like I said, if your not an engineer, your "common sense" is less than worthless.
no but I have read many stories and saw plenty on the speculation of what happened.I'm not an engineer so I can't dispute that. But. equally, are you?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.