The Caylee Anthony Case

[Panacea]

I posted this on FB, thought I'd share it here:

All the religious pro-life people in my office had a COW that Casey Anthony got off scot free. One made the comment that Casey ought to be "fixed." I threw in "this is why when people want an abortion, you should let them." It got real quiet real quick.

heh

 

[Aries]

You people who are arguing that this girl is innocent are just arguing because you like being on the other side of an argument. She may have gotten lucky that the prosecution were total idiots with how to prosecute, but she is guilty of something. Her child is dead. She is the mother. She lied for good reason.

I'm disgusted that any of you would sit here and argue for this chick when her child is dead. The child isn't dead because her mother took her to school and voila she ended up dead. Get real people. What are you really arguing for? That justice was served? Really?

:clap:clap:clap

 

[Aries]

Just wondering what all you 'pro Casey Anthony verdict' people think about the OJ Simpson verdict. Was justice served there too?

 

[Tim]

You people who are arguing that this girl is innocent are just arguing because you like being on the other side of an argument. She may have gotten lucky that the prosecution were total idiots with how to prosecute, but she is guilty of something. Her child is dead. She is the mother. She lied for good reason.

I'm disgusted that any of you would sit here and argue for this chick when her child is dead. The child isn't dead because her mother took her to school and voila she ended up dead. Get real people. What are you really arguing for? That justice was served? Really?

It would be just as wrong for me to sit here and say she is innocent in the death of her child as it would be for you to say she is guilty of murder.

Nobody but those involved knows what happened and the likelihood that they will ever be 100% honest and forthcoming is slim to none.

Nobody know how this poor child died, yet people want to automatically jump to the conclusion that she was murdered and want to string up the mother.

I'm curious to know how many people think there is enough evidence to warrant the mothers execution.

 

[BadBoy]

It would be just as wrong for me to sit here and say she is innocent in the death of her child as it would be for you to say she is guilty of murder.

Nobody but those involved knows what happened and the likelihood that they will ever be 100% honest and forthcoming is slim to none.

Nobody know how this poor child died, yet people want to automatically jump to the conclusion that she was murdered and want to string up the mother.

I'm curious to know how many people think there is enough evidence to warrant the mothers execution.

I didn't say she was necessarily guilty of murder. But she is guilty of something. A child died for some reason.

No, there is no where near the right amount of evidence to convict this woman for the death penalty.

 

[Tangerine]

Just wondering what all you 'pro Casey Anthony verdict' people think about the OJ Simpson verdict. Was justice served there too?

I guess it depends on your interpretation of "justice." Mine is that the accused gets their Constitutionally protected day in court, and the process is allowed to happen in the light of day, and that the person is judged by a jury of their peers, and that they are considered "innocent until proven guilty." If those things are followed, then yes, I believe justice is served. My opinion on OJ's case is the same as this one - the prosecutors did NOT meet the burden of proof and the jurors made the decision based on what they heard and saw.

It sounds more like you are in search of "vengeance," rather than justice. It is a fine line.

 

[MoonOwl]

:wtf:Now granted I am a PeaBrain, but I don't recall anyone posting in this thread stating that they thought Casey was innocent. Funny how things get twisted?

Quick! Someone make a poll. I'm too lazy to do it.


Janie, I love ya woman. Give em logic to stew on....:humm:

 

[Tim]

Janie, I love ya woman. Give em logic to stew on....:humm:

Logic should never be brought into these discussions...

 

[BadBoy]

:wtf:Now granted I am a PeaBrain, but I don't recall anyone posting in this thread stating that they thought Casey was innocent. Funny how things get twisted?

Quick! Someone make a poll. I'm too lazy to do it.


Janie, I love ya woman. Give em logic to stew on....:humm:

Anyone stating that no one can prove what happened to the child is in essence arguing her innocence indirectly. She knows exactly what happened to that child and to lie about it is guilt.

She is guilty of something.

 

[Tim]

She is guilty of something.

So is she guilty of murder?
or is she guilty of trying to cover up an accident?

There is a huge difference between the two. One deserves heavy jail time, one does not... so which is it?

 

[Peter Parka]

The biggest problem I have with the case in the amount of shit written about it by people with their own agenda in the media before the trial. The jury should be making their mind up based on facts presented in court, not propaganda they might have seen or read elsewhere. Very irresponsible reporting has surrounded this case.

 

[Aries]

I guess it depends on your interpretation of "justice." Mine is that the accused gets their Constitutionally protected day in court, and the process is allowed to happen in the light of day, and that the person is judged by a jury of their peers, and that they are considered "innocent until proven guilty." If those things are followed, then yes, I believe justice is served. My opinion on OJ's case is the same as this one - the prosecutors did NOT meet the burden of proof and the jurors made the decision based on what they heard and saw.

It sounds more like you are in search of "vengeance," rather than justice. It is a fine line.

So you never once said OJ was guilty and got away with murder?

In search of vengeance? How can you say that without knowing me or my thoughts. Let me try and spell this out to everyone that is attacking every word I say....

Based on everything I read on this case and everything I watched, I feel she is 100% guilty. Did the prosecution show this "beyond a reasonable doubt" I don't know. Am I blaming the juror's or even the prosecution/defense? No, I am not. The bottom line for me is that an innocent little girl named Caylee did not get the justice she so deserves.

Again, my OPINION is that she is 100% guilty and that will not change unless someone comes forward and admits killing her. It's my opinion and I don't expect anyone to agree with me or attack me for it.

Also, I am not entirely sure how I feel about the death penalty in any situation.

 

[MoonOwl]

Anyone stating that no one can prove what happened to the child is in essence arguing her innocence indirectly.

Oh please. What a stretch. :24: You must be arguing for the sake of argument.

Too bad there wasn't overwhelming evidence to convict. At least enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Does that mean I think she's innocent? No. As many have said here repeatedly, too bad the state didn't do a better job in finding evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt she was indeed guilty.

*wonders why I'm back in here again*

 

[BadBoy]

Its not an absolute. She is guilty of child endangerment, child neglect, covering up an accident, not reporting a death of a minor, etc. What matters about length of jail time to serve?

 

[Tim]

I'll ask this one more time...

To those who think she is guilty, how did Caylee die?

 

[Kyle B]

Looks like Casey will be strolling out of jail in six days.

 

[BadBoy]

Natural causes: heart attack, stroke, brain aneurysm.

She's innocent, right?

 

[Aries]

Well, the innocent one will be out of jail on July 13th.

 

[Alien Allen]

I'll ask this one more time...

To those who think she is guilty, how did Caylee die?

The duct tape man did it

Seriously, how can one even make a claim of murder when there is no determination of how she died to begin with ???

Speculation and common sense say there was no doubt foul play but still no definitive cause.

I still say Wendy Murphy is on to something. It all makes sense if you follow the bouncing duct tape

 

[porterjack]

Why? This is our judicial system "at work". Isn't it a good thing to witness the proceedings and to see the inner workings? Most of us don't get to see a case go to trial very often.

and as such most of us/you can never know full fact and led by "expert opinion" spewed on prime time TV