Prove to me creationism is real

[All Else Failed]

Okay, let's throw away the GLOBAL UNDERWATER thing, let's just throw it the hell away, and look at the possibility that, areas were flooded, by a GREAT FLOOD, not a planetary flood.

Read it at its merit, do not make it look like I am making something appear that is clearly not there.

Thats what I've always suggested. People back then saw that a big part of where they lived was flooded, and they thought in turn the ENTIRE world was flooded. I'm talking to the people that believe the global flood myth.

 

[All Else Failed]

Which of these two things are not the same?

read those two again, carefully.

 

[BadBoy@TheWheel]

Thats what I've always suggested. People back then saw that a big part of where they lived was flooded, and they thought in turn the ENTIRE world was flooded. I'm talking to the people that believe the global flood myth.

So are you admitting that it is in fact possible, that the story of Noah is possible?

Maybe it was a great flood, but not global.

 

[IntruderLS1]

LOL Dude, it just hit me. I think this was our very first argument together!! It's like some terribly dark anniversary or something. HAHA!!

http://www.offtopicz.net/14074-revelations-3.html

 

[SRC]

Thats what I've always suggested. People back then saw that a big part of where they lived was flooded, and they thought in turn the ENTIRE world was flooded. I'm talking to the people that believe the global flood myth.

People also thought the world was flat up until WAY after biblical tines too. The entire earth was not inhabited at the tie of the flood .. but I'm fairly certain at the time the inhabited parts probably thought they were IN the entire earth .. and were not aware of many other parts of the earth.

Who's to say that the flood isn't what initially created the "rest" of the earth ..a s far as land mass is concerned? It could be what caused continents to break apart, perhaps parts of the ocean floor rose up .. as you stated earlier ..

I think there are alot of "what if's" in this world .. and there are just TOO many that no ne will ever prove in a solid .. without a doubt .. manner.

in one word ....

YouTube - Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps - Anastasia

 

[COOL_BREEZE2]

Thats what I've always suggested. People back then saw that a big part of where they lived was flooded, and they thought in turn the ENTIRE world was flooded. I'm talking to the people that believe the global flood myth.

You say it's a myth. Do you have proof it is a myth?

 

[IntruderLS1]

Hey its ok man, I know what its like to be backed into a corner.

L.M.A.O. :24::24::24:

Stop playing. You know what I'm on about. You just want it to go away.

When have I ever demonstrated a fear of debate with you? Your biggest debating skill is that you never say die. This doesn't make you imposing by any means friend. Don't fool yourself with the argument that last word in a thread = a victory.

 

[Tim]

Scott, you have posted 12 times in this thread with zero substance.... are you going to add anything to this thread at all? :dunno

just curious...

 

[IntruderLS1]

Scott, you have posted 12 times in this thread with zero substance.... are you going to add anything to this thread at all? :dunno

just curious...

I'm actually on something very specific here that AEF is aware of Tim. I'm trying to get an acknowledgment out of him, but nothing is working.

I'll stop. I guess 12 times is enough.

 

[Tim]

I'm actually on something very specific here that AEF is aware of Tim. I'm trying to get an acknowledgment out of him, but nothing is working.

I'll stop. I guess 12 times is enough.

You don't have to stop... I just really want to hear from your side... it seems like I can make good points to never having them addressed.

I would rather hear your look on it... it ain't no fun debating alone.

 

[All Else Failed]

So are you admitting that it is in fact possible, that the story of Noah is possible?

Maybe it was a great flood, but not global.

Nope, seeing as how the story of Noah doesn't make sense with a smaller, local flood.

If the story of noah is true, and god was right, then there was no need to build such a massive ship, and bring EVERY kind of animal aboard it, since a smaller flood would only effect the animals in THAT region. The rest of the animals would have been fine and they wouldn't have been on the "ark".

 

[All Else Failed]

I'm actually on something very specific here that AEF is aware of Tim. I'm trying to get an acknowledgment out of him, but nothing is working.

I'll stop. I guess 12 times is enough.

what is it you want? State it right here.

 

[IntruderLS1]

You don't have to stop... I just really want to hear from your side... it seems like I can make good points to never having them addressed.

I would rather hear your look on it... it ain't no fun debating alone.

Fair enough. Give me a second to go through your posts. I haven't been keeping up, I've just been looking for something specific.

 

[All Else Failed]

You say it's a myth. Do you have proof it is a myth?

Yes: Geology.


and


the fact that numerous culture's have written history and advanced civilization that lived on uninterrupted at the supposed time of the "great flood".

 

[COOL_BREEZE2]

Yes: Geology.


and


the fact that numerous culture's have written history and advanced civilization that lived on uninterrupted at the supposed time of the "great flood".

"Great flood" may not necessarily mean "Global" flood.

And I'm still not convinced that your Geology theories = proof.

 

[All Else Failed]

"Great flood" may not necessarily mean "Global" flood.

And I'm still not convinced that your Geology theories = proof.

these are geological FACTS. All of the above stated geological proofs are how the Earth works.

 

[SRC]

Nope, seeing as how the story of Noah doesn't make sense with a smaller, local flood.

If the story of noah is true, and god was right, then there was no need to build such a massive ship, and bring EVERY kind of animal aboard it, since a smaller flood would only effect the animals in THAT region. The rest of the animals would have been fine and they wouldn't have been on the "ark".

You do realize that until said flood .. animals probably didn't exist on the "rest" of the earth .. they were created in a general location and didn't migrate until the continents divided and mved off in different directions.

Also, who's to say they actually had "every" kind of animal . perhaps they had every kind of animal indiginous to the region that was flooded .. and they brought every kind of THAT animal onto the ark? :confused

 

[thrawn]

the bible doesn't say the earth was created on one of those six days

 

[All Else Failed]

You do realize that until said flood .. animals probably didn't exist on the "rest" of the earth .. they were created in a general location and didn't migrate until the continents divided and mved off in different directions.

Also, who's to say they actually had "every" kind of animal . perhaps they had every kind of animal indiginous to the region that was flooded .. and they brought every kind of THAT animal onto the ark? :confused

We can make assumptions all day. Until then, we should go by with what we know, and thats certainly not all of this creation mumbo jumbo.

 

[Tim]

You do realize that until said flood .. animals probably didn't exist on the "rest" of the earth .. they were created in a general location and didn't migrate until the continents divided and mved off in different directions.

Also, who's to say they actually had "every" kind of animal . perhaps they had every kind of animal indiginous to the region that was flooded .. and they brought every kind of THAT animal onto the ark? :confused

A global flood no matter how large would not be capable of moving continents. They don't just float in the ocean. The entire face of the earth is separated into tectonic plates that are all connected. A flood could not move continents... just not possible.