Re: Man is banned from having sex by High Court judge because his IQ is too low Read
Do you realize what an IQ or 48 means? O, maybe you relate. I digress.
Do you realize what an IQ or 48 means? O, maybe you relate. I digress.
And since you can hardly chaperone someone during sex.....
Kinda sums up how you cant enforce this as law as well.
Do you realize what an IQ or 48 means? O, maybe you relate. I digress.
Well, he is retarded, he's subhuman, he's not just a stupid man. So it makes sense banning him from having sex as much as it would make sense to ban a 6 year old from having sex. It's to protect him most of all.
Well, he is retarded, he's subhuman, he's not just a stupid man. So it makes sense banning him from having sex as much as it would make sense to ban a 6 year old from having sex. It's to protect him most of all.
Well, he is retarded, that's just the word to describe someone with a 48 IQ.
i am going to have to disagree with your comment of "subhuman".....would also like to give you some friendly advice. you do not know all of the members backgrounds here so the names you are using could be offensive to some.
Well, he is retarded, that's just the word to describe someone with a 48 IQ. He's a walking vegetable with a penis.
If Katie Price is allowed to have sex, I see no reason why this man can't. Stupid interfering, big brother government strikes again!
^
If I offended you with a swear word, I would be more than happy to replace it with something else. You just have to say, that's all. I have a few bad habits - swearing is one of them.
Sweetie, you weren't the one I was referring to xxxooo, and I don't offend easily with swear words.
This world is getting a little too sugar coated. I'm not trying to stir the pot here, but retarded is a medical term. If I'm smart, should be I be called mentally inclined? Or just smart? I think we get too hung up on a single word and miss someones opinion entirely. Then we expand on our opinion and throw the topic of the thread into further disarray. Personally I feel that retarded is a strong word and would use handicapped, but that's me. Since so many are taking a moral high ground here, then I say run with it. Place the individual on ignore and allow the others who are able to discuss this in a mature manner to carry on with the conversation.
I have yet to develop an opinion on this subject, as I'm still kicking it around. I can understand both sides and can also see morality in them both. I need to think about it more, but some good points have been made in this thread.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.